Denise Harrison

5.1k total citations
144 papers, 3.5k citations indexed

About

Denise Harrison is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pharmacy and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, Denise Harrison has authored 144 papers receiving a total of 3.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 115 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 48 papers in Pharmacy and 27 papers in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology. Recurrent topics in Denise Harrison's work include Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (110 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (79 papers) and Infant Health and Development (47 papers). Denise Harrison is often cited by papers focused on Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (110 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (79 papers) and Infant Health and Development (47 papers). Denise Harrison collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Denise Harrison's co-authors include Bonnie Stevens, Mariana Bueno, Linda J. Johnston, Janet Yamada, Dianne Crellin, Nick Santamaria, Franz E Babl, Peter Loughnan, Jessica Reszel and Thomasin Adams-Webber and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and PEDIATRICS.

In The Last Decade

Denise Harrison

138 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Denise Harrison Canada 34 2.5k 770 611 459 352 144 3.5k
C. Meghan McMurtry Canada 24 1.7k 0.7× 304 0.4× 365 0.6× 386 0.8× 103 0.3× 111 3.1k
Susan Jay United States 27 1.7k 0.7× 236 0.3× 374 0.6× 276 0.6× 309 0.9× 41 2.8k
Debra Brandon United States 29 1.5k 0.6× 215 0.3× 396 0.6× 249 0.5× 51 0.1× 131 2.7k
Inger Hallström Sweden 37 2.2k 0.9× 258 0.3× 777 1.3× 863 1.9× 69 0.2× 165 4.1k
Sølvi Helseth Norway 33 1.4k 0.6× 179 0.2× 297 0.5× 635 1.4× 186 0.5× 126 3.3k
Sandra G. Funk United States 21 952 0.4× 170 0.2× 445 0.7× 1.4k 3.0× 164 0.5× 57 3.2k
Kristofer Årestedt Sweden 33 375 0.2× 154 0.2× 591 1.0× 778 1.7× 82 0.2× 195 4.1k
Jacqueline Fowler Byers United States 20 418 0.2× 140 0.2× 190 0.3× 281 0.6× 88 0.3× 58 1.8k
Samuel LeBaron United States 21 1.2k 0.5× 101 0.1× 154 0.3× 151 0.3× 189 0.5× 58 2.1k
Fiona Alderdice United Kingdom 31 1.6k 0.7× 86 0.1× 206 0.3× 501 1.1× 34 0.1× 185 4.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Denise Harrison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Harrison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Harrison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Harrison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denise Harrison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Harrison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Harrison. The network helps show where Denise Harrison may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denise Harrison

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denise Harrison. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denise Harrison based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denise Harrison. Denise Harrison is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Harrison, Denise, Mariana Bueno, & Nicole Pope. (2024). Pain in Infants and Children. PubMed. 78–93.
2.
Dunn, Sandra, Catherine Larocque, Marsha Campbell‐Yeo, et al.. (2024). Increasing the Use of Newborn Pain Treatment Following the Implementation of a Parent-Targeted Video: An Outcome Evaluation. Children. 11(11). 1360–1360. 1 indexed citations
3.
Zhang, Tao, et al.. (2023). There are already enough studies on sweet solutions for neonatal procedural pain and more would be unethical and unnecessary. Acta Paediatrica. 112(7). 1434–1436. 3 indexed citations
4.
Bujalka, Helena, Melinda Cruz, Jeanie L.Y. Cheong, et al.. (2022). Be Sweet to Babies. Advances in Neonatal Care. 23(1). E2–E13. 5 indexed citations
5.
Crellin, Dianne, Denise Harrison, Nick Santamaria, Md Hamidul Huque, & Franz E Babl. (2021). The Psychometric Properties of the Visual Analogue Scale Applied by an Observer to Assess Procedural Pain in Infants and Young Children: An Observational Study. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 59. 89–95. 8 indexed citations
6.
Backman, Chantal, et al.. (2021). A Cross-Sectional Review of Pain Management Interventions Used for Painful Pediatric Blood Draw Procedures in Hospital. Pain Management Nursing. 22(5). 645–651. 5 indexed citations
7.
Hu, Jiale, Xue Feng, Yuxiao Liu, et al.. (2021). Using Social Media to Disseminate Effective Pain Treatments for Newborns During Needle-Related Painful Procedures in China. The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing. 35(4). E50–E57. 5 indexed citations
8.
Taljaard, Monica, Jessica Reszel, Sandra Dunn, et al.. (2019). A Parent-Targeted and Mediated Video Intervention to Improve Uptake of Pain Treatment for Infants During Newborn Screening. The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing. 33(1). 74–81. 17 indexed citations
10.
Harrison, Denise, et al.. (2018). Seja Doce com os Bebês: avaliação de vídeo instrucional sobre manejo da dor neonatal por enfermeiros. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 3 indexed citations
11.
Stevens, Bonnie, Janet Yamada, Marsha Campbell‐Yeo, et al.. (2018). The minimally effective dose of sucrose for procedural pain relief in neonates: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Pediatrics. 18(1). 85–85. 71 indexed citations
12.
Costa, Anna Caroline Leite, et al.. (2018). Painful procedures and analgesia in hospitalized newborns: A prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Neonatal Nursing. 25(1). 26–31. 19 indexed citations
13.
Harrison, Denise, Jessica Reszel, Mariana Bueno, et al.. (2017). Pain Management During Newborn Screening. The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing. 31(2). 172–177. 25 indexed citations
14.
Bueno, Mariana, et al.. (2017). Evaluation of a parent‐targeted video in Portuguese to improve pain management practices in neonates. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 27(5-6). 1153–1159. 23 indexed citations
16.
Harrison, Denise, Sonja Elia, Elizabeth Manias, & Jenny Royle. (2014). Sucrose and lollypops to reduce immunisation pain in toddlers and young children: Two pilot randomised controlled trials. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 17(1). 19–26. 5 indexed citations
17.
Chandra, Abhinav, et al.. (2009). 238: An Analysis of Emergency Department Observation Units Impact on Patient Satisfaction Scores. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 54(3). S74–S75. 1 indexed citations
18.
Harrison, Denise. (2006). Australian College of Neonatal Nurses Position Statement No. 2003/2: Management of pain in sick hospitalised infants. 9(1). 1 indexed citations
19.
Spence, Kaye, Donna Gillies, Denise Harrison, Linda J. Johnston, & Sue Nagy. (2005). A Reliable Pain Assessment Tool for Clinical Assessment in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 34(1). 80–86. 50 indexed citations
20.
Harrison, Denise, Cheryl Evans, Linda J. Johnston, & Peter Loughnan. (2002). Bedside Assessment of Heel Lance Pain in the Hospitalized Infant. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 31(5). 551–557. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026