Denis Lafortune

423 total citations
49 papers, 246 citations indexed

About

Denis Lafortune is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Denis Lafortune has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 246 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Clinical Psychology, 16 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 11 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Denis Lafortune's work include Child Abuse and Trauma (14 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (12 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (12 papers). Denis Lafortune is often cited by papers focused on Child Abuse and Trauma (14 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (12 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (12 papers). Denis Lafortune collaborates with scholars based in Canada, France and Slovenia. Denis Lafortune's co-authors include Franca Cortoni, Serge Brochu, Catherine Laurier, Alexandre Dumais, Steve Geoffrion, Johanne Collin, Nicolas Sauvion, Nathalie Boissot, Paquito Bernard and Maxime Fortin and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Abuse & Neglect, Journal of Adolescence and Journal of Research on Adolescence.

In The Last Decade

Denis Lafortune

40 papers receiving 215 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Denis Lafortune Canada 8 180 91 58 31 30 49 246
Kristin Evans United States 9 95 0.5× 141 1.5× 65 1.1× 8 0.3× 5 0.2× 11 351
Naamith Heiblum United States 6 223 1.2× 84 0.9× 58 1.0× 40 1.3× 17 0.6× 6 285
Maria Florence South Africa 8 69 0.4× 69 0.8× 52 0.9× 19 0.6× 9 0.3× 27 206
Sara Wigderson United States 7 87 0.5× 46 0.5× 65 1.1× 18 0.6× 8 0.3× 8 308
Hugo S. Gomes Portugal 10 192 1.1× 87 1.0× 26 0.4× 10 0.3× 36 1.2× 34 275
Tania Pearce Australia 11 226 1.3× 58 0.6× 107 1.8× 12 0.4× 8 0.3× 16 333
Subharati Ghosh United States 10 180 1.0× 46 0.5× 59 1.0× 28 0.9× 75 2.5× 17 259
Courtenay Matsu United States 7 210 1.2× 75 0.8× 27 0.5× 35 1.1× 8 0.3× 10 403
Lindsey Parnarouskis United States 11 129 0.7× 27 0.3× 82 1.4× 7 0.2× 14 0.5× 21 276
Henriette Kyrrestad Norway 9 78 0.4× 34 0.4× 75 1.3× 18 0.6× 7 0.2× 23 234

Countries citing papers authored by Denis Lafortune

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denis Lafortune's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denis Lafortune with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denis Lafortune more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denis Lafortune

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denis Lafortune. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denis Lafortune. The network helps show where Denis Lafortune may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denis Lafortune

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denis Lafortune. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denis Lafortune based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denis Lafortune. Denis Lafortune is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lafortune, Denis, et al.. (2023). Les interventions québécoises pour adolescents auteurs d’agression sexuelle. Revue de psychoéducation. 36(1). 25–56.
2.
Laurier, Catherine, et al.. (2021). Profile of Runaway Youths from Residential Care Centers: Variation in Risk‐Taking Propensity. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 32(1). 355–371.
3.
Geoffrion, Steve, Josianne Lamothe, Sarah Fraser, Denis Lafortune, & Alexandre Dumais. (2020). Worker and perceived team climate factors influence the use of restraint and seclusion in youth residential treatment centers: Results from a mixed-method longitudinal study. Child Abuse & Neglect. 111. 104825–104825. 8 indexed citations
4.
Daignault, Isabelle V., et al.. (2020). TRAJECTOIRES DE SERVICES DES JEUNES SOUS LA DOUBLE AUTORITÉ DE LA PROTECTION DE LA JEUNESSE ET DE LA JUSTICE JUVÉNILE : DIFFÉRENCES ET SPÉCIFICITÉS. Érudit (Université de Montréal). 36(2). 125–142. 3 indexed citations
5.
Fortin, Maxime, et al.. (2019). The Use of Restraint and Seclusion in Residential Treatment Care for Youth: A Systematic Review of Related Factors and Interventions. Trauma Violence & Abuse. 22(2). 318–338. 33 indexed citations
8.
Lafortune, Denis, et al.. (2017). Détermination de la peine dans le système de justice pénale pour adolescents : examen des dilemmes éthiques vécus par les acteurs judiciaires québécois. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale. 1–27. 1 indexed citations
9.
Brochu, Serge, et al.. (2014). Factors associated with the motivation to use psychoactive substances and the motivation to change in adolescents in an authoritarian context. Children and Youth Services Review. 39. 11–19. 4 indexed citations
10.
Lafortune, Denis, et al.. (2013). Medically Defining, Screening, and Treating Conduct Disorder: A French Controversy. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 23(4). 728–737. 4 indexed citations
11.
Lafortune, Denis, et al.. (2012). Perspective de la maternité et troubles des conduites alimentaires : une exploration de l’univers de « l’avant-conception ». L Évolution Psychiatrique. 77(2). 247–264. 2 indexed citations
12.
Lafortune, Denis, et al.. (2010). Pratiques innovantes auprès des jeunes en difficulté. Presses de l’Université de Montréal eBooks. 1 indexed citations
13.
Lafortune, Denis. (2010). Prevalence and screening of mental disorders in short-term correctional facilities. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 33(2). 94–100. 36 indexed citations
14.
Lafortune, Denis, et al.. (2010). La prescription de médicaments psychotropes aux personnes incarcérées dans les prisons provinciales du Québec. Santé mentale au Québec. 34(2). 147–170. 4 indexed citations
15.
Cortoni, Franca & Denis Lafortune. (2009). Le traitement correctionnel fondé sur des données probantes : une recension. Criminologie. 42(1). 61–89. 21 indexed citations
16.
Laurier, Catherine & Denis Lafortune. (2007). Validation de l'Échelle d'évaluation des comportements et des attitudes d'observance des prescriptions psychopharmacologiques (ÉCAOPP).. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement. 39(4). 326–338. 2 indexed citations
17.
Lafortune, Denis & Johanne Collin. (2006). La prescription de médicaments psychotropes aux enfants et adolescents: Prévalence, politiques, pratiques et pistes de recherche.. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne. 47(3). 155–169. 6 indexed citations
18.
Lafortune, Denis, et al.. (2004). Un père incarcéré : facteur de risque ou de protection pour ses enfants ?. Érudit (Université de Montréal). 4. 2 indexed citations
19.
Boissot, Nathalie, et al.. (2003). Field Resistance to Bemisia tabaci in Cucumis melo. HortScience. 38(1). 77–80. 12 indexed citations
20.
Boissot, Nathalie, et al.. (2000). INSECT RESISTANCE IN CUCUMIS MELO ACCESSION 90625. Acta Horticulturae. 297–304. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026