Debra Lappin

440 total citations
8 papers, 300 citations indexed

About

Debra Lappin is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Debra Lappin has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 300 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in General Health Professions, 2 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 2 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Debra Lappin's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper). Debra Lappin is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (1 paper). Debra Lappin collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. Debra Lappin's co-authors include Joseph A. Buckwalter, Leigh F. Callahan, Jeffrey J. Sacks, Erica L. Odom, Charles G. Helmick, Roland W. Moskowitz, Rowland W. Chang, Patience H. White, George Vradenburg and Jeffrey L. Cummings and has published in prestigious journals such as Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Alzheimer s & Dementia and Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism.

In The Last Decade

Debra Lappin

7 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Debra Lappin United States 5 93 80 60 56 56 8 300
Puvan Tharmanathan United Kingdom 11 56 0.6× 39 0.5× 37 0.6× 115 2.1× 16 0.3× 24 445
Maurício Pimentel Brazil 11 31 0.3× 25 0.3× 24 0.4× 51 0.9× 56 1.0× 37 390
Steve Blume United Kingdom 4 8 0.1× 101 1.3× 107 1.8× 20 0.4× 44 0.8× 5 391
Alexa Gilbert United States 3 12 0.1× 63 0.8× 22 0.4× 85 1.5× 14 0.3× 5 401
Gianluca Trifirò Netherlands 7 9 0.1× 106 1.3× 48 0.8× 16 0.3× 61 1.1× 8 532
Pi-Shan Hsu Taiwan 10 28 0.3× 30 0.4× 13 0.2× 51 0.9× 53 0.9× 35 329
Maja R Radojčić United Kingdom 8 63 0.7× 49 0.6× 12 0.2× 67 1.2× 36 0.6× 21 216
Miriam Hattle United Kingdom 7 28 0.3× 26 0.3× 36 0.6× 23 0.4× 11 0.2× 17 286
Martina D’Onghia Italy 9 38 0.4× 142 1.8× 10 0.2× 89 1.6× 33 0.6× 34 308

Countries citing papers authored by Debra Lappin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debra Lappin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra Lappin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra Lappin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debra Lappin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra Lappin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra Lappin. The network helps show where Debra Lappin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Debra Lappin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Debra Lappin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Debra Lappin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Debra Lappin. Debra Lappin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
DeMuro, Carla, Emily Bratlee‐Whitaker, Ann Hartry, et al.. (2024). Measuring What Matters Most to People Living with Alzheimer’s Disease and Care Partners: What Matters Most Quantitative Research Development. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 20(S4). 1 indexed citations
2.
Callahan, Leigh F., Brian Samsell, Dana DiBenedetti, et al.. (2023). Evaluating Elements of the Care Partner Experience in Individuals Who Care for People with Alzheimer's Disease Across the Severity Spectrum. Neurology and Therapy. 13(1). 53–67. 1 indexed citations
3.
DiBenedetti, Dana, Christina Slota, George Vradenburg, et al.. (2020). Assessing what matters most to patients with or at risk for Alzheimer’s and care partners: a qualitative study evaluating symptoms, impacts, and outcomes. Alzheimer s Research & Therapy. 12(1). 90–90. 53 indexed citations
4.
Vradenburg, George, Dana DiBenedetti, Brett Hauber, et al.. (2019). P4‐673: FINDINGS FROM THE ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE PATIENT AND CAREGIVER ENGAGEMENT (AD PACE) INITIATIVE'S WHAT MATTERS MOST QUALITATIVE STUDY. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 15(7S_Part_30).
5.
Cummings, Jeffrey L., Paul Aisen, Rachelle S. Doody, et al.. (2016). RE-ENGINEERING ALZHEIMER CLINICAL TRIALS: GLOBAL ALZHEIMER’S PLATFORM NETWORK. The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease. 3(2). 1–7. 43 indexed citations
6.
Shineman, Diana W., John Alam, Margaret Anderson, et al.. (2014). Overcoming obstacles to repurposing for neurodegenerative disease. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology. 1(7). 512–518. 42 indexed citations
7.
White, Patience H., Leigh F. Callahan, Rowland W. Chang, et al.. (2010). A National Public Health Agenda for Osteoarthritis 2010. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism. 39(5). 323–326. 82 indexed citations
8.
Buckwalter, Joseph A. & Debra Lappin. (2000). The Disproportionate Impact of Chronic Arthralgia and Arthritis Among Women. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 372(372). 159–168. 78 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026