Deborah Tuttle

764 citations
24 papers · 510 indexed · h-index 12

Deborah Tuttle

23 papers receiving 487 citations

Peers

Deborah Tuttle
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Emergency Medical Services 97
  • Pharmacy 66
  • Family Practice 23
  • Health Information Management 37
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 10
Replace Valentine Akande with:
Valentine Akande United Kingdom
M. Ben Rejeb Tunisia
Kristine M. Thompson United States
Adrian Plunkett United Kingdom
Mergan Naidoo South Africa
Daniela Ghelfi Switzerland
Donald F. German United States
Hernando Gaitán‐Duarte Colombia
Eric R. Coon United States
Georg Staubli Switzerland
Deborah Tuttle relative to Valentine Akande United Kingdom Valentine Akande's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Valentine Akande · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Tuttle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Tuttle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Tuttle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Tuttle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Tuttle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Tuttle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Tuttle. The network helps show where Deborah Tuttle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Tuttle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Tuttle Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Tuttle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202110
2 202053
3 20189
4 20183
5 201711
6 20173
7 201448
8 20121
9 201281
10 20044
11 200474
12 200311
13 200219
14 199921
15 19970
16 19972
17 199645
18 199212
19
Outcome Reporting to Target Areas for Quality Improvement
19901
20 197025

About Deborah Tuttle

Deborah Tuttle is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Health Information Management, Pharmacy, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 24 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (7 papers), Neonatal and Maternal Infections (4 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (2 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (2 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (2 papers) and Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (97 citations), Pharmacy (66 citations), Family Practice (23 citations), Health Information Management (37 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (10 citations). Deborah Tuttle has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David A. Paul, Tracy Baird, Amy Mackley, Robert G. Holloway, Robert Locke, Peter S. Cartwright, Katrina Conard, James S. Reilly, Lisa Saiman and Kathleen H Leef. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Perinatology, Pediatric Research, Neurology, Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal and Journal of Pediatric Surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026