Deborah Tuttle

764 total citations
24 papers, 510 citations indexed

About

Deborah Tuttle is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah Tuttle has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 510 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Epidemiology, 8 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 7 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Deborah Tuttle's work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (7 papers), Neonatal and Maternal Infections (4 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers). Deborah Tuttle is often cited by papers focused on Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (7 papers), Neonatal and Maternal Infections (4 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers). Deborah Tuttle collaborates with scholars based in United States. Deborah Tuttle's co-authors include David A. Paul, Tracy Baird, Robert G. Holloway, Amy Mackley, Robert Locke, James S. Reilly, Peter S. Cartwright, Katrina Conard, Lisa Saiman and John L Stefano and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Neurology and Stroke.

In The Last Decade

Deborah Tuttle

23 papers receiving 487 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Deborah Tuttle United States 12 131 121 116 104 97 24 510
Gitte Zachariassen Denmark 18 337 2.6× 86 0.7× 236 2.0× 102 1.0× 306 3.2× 71 922
Bhupinder Sandhu United Kingdom 16 132 1.0× 188 1.6× 35 0.3× 61 0.6× 106 1.1× 34 761
Felice Su United States 14 94 0.7× 122 1.0× 95 0.8× 90 0.9× 152 1.6× 43 838
Abdullah F. Mobeireek Saudi Arabia 14 109 0.8× 133 1.1× 294 2.5× 126 1.2× 24 0.2× 53 734
Adrian Plunkett United Kingdom 12 89 0.7× 63 0.5× 57 0.5× 113 1.1× 128 1.3× 29 439
Georg Staubli Switzerland 11 136 1.0× 67 0.6× 33 0.3× 87 0.8× 78 0.8× 38 634
Daniel W. Ochsenschlager United States 15 81 0.6× 221 1.8× 85 0.7× 110 1.1× 244 2.5× 24 765
Frank A. Maffei United States 10 261 2.0× 164 1.4× 147 1.3× 118 1.1× 85 0.9× 19 618
E G Weinberg South Africa 20 143 1.1× 94 0.8× 542 4.7× 105 1.0× 56 0.6× 43 1.4k
Daniela Ghelfi Switzerland 12 129 1.0× 157 1.3× 206 1.8× 116 1.1× 80 0.8× 15 463

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Tuttle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Tuttle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Tuttle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Tuttle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Tuttle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Tuttle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Tuttle. The network helps show where Deborah Tuttle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Tuttle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Tuttle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Tuttle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Tuttle. Deborah Tuttle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Viscardi, Rose M., Michael L. Terrin, Laurence S. Magder, et al.. (2021). Randomized trial of azithromycin to eradicate Ureaplasma respiratory colonization in preterm infants: 2-year outcomes. Pediatric Research. 91(1). 178–187. 10 indexed citations
2.
Viscardi, Rose M., Michael L. Terrin, Laurence S. Magder, et al.. (2020). Randomised trial of azithromycin to eradicate Ureaplasma in preterm infants. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal. 105(6). 615–622. 53 indexed citations
3.
Tuttle, Deborah, et al.. (2018). Outcome Differences in Neonates Exposed In-Utero to Opioids Managed in the NICU Versus Pediatric Floor. Journal of Addiction Medicine. 13(1). 75–78. 9 indexed citations
4.
Jenness, Samuel M., et al.. (2018). Evaluating a neonatal intensive care unit MRSA surveillance programme using agent-based network modelling. Journal of Hospital Infection. 100(3). 337–343. 3 indexed citations
5.
Goldstein, Neal D., Stephen C. Eppes, Amy Mackley, Deborah Tuttle, & David A. Paul. (2017). A Network Model of Hand Hygiene: How Good Is Good Enough to Stop the Spread of MRSA?. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 38(8). 945–952. 11 indexed citations
6.
Goldstein, Neal D., et al.. (2017). Spatial and environmental correlates of organism colonization and infection in the neonatal intensive care unit. Journal of Perinatology. 38(5). 567–573. 3 indexed citations
7.
Tuttle, Deborah, et al.. (2014). Prolonged Early Antibiotic Use and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Very Low Birth Weight Infants. American Journal of Perinatology. 32(1). 43–48. 48 indexed citations
9.
Kennedy, Byron S., Mary Younge, Deborah Tuttle, et al.. (2012). Outbreak ofMycobacterium chelonaeInfection Associated with Tattoo Ink. New England Journal of Medicine. 367(11). 1020–1024. 81 indexed citations
10.
Kelly, Adam G., et al.. (2008). Public Reporting of Quality Data for Stroke. Stroke. 39(12). 3367–3371. 19 indexed citations
11.
Pentima, M. Cecilia Di, Robin Doyle, Robert Locke, & Deborah Tuttle. (2004). Late-OnsetMycobacterium abscessusSepsis in a Very Low Birthweight Premature Infant: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges. American Journal of Perinatology. 21(6). 365–368. 4 indexed citations
12.
Tuttle, Deborah. (2004). Electronic reporting to improve patient safety. BMJ Quality & Safety. 13(4). 281–286. 74 indexed citations
13.
Paul, David A., et al.. (2003). Maternal Antibiotics and Decreased Periventricular Leukomalacia in Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 157(2). 145–145. 11 indexed citations
14.
Tuttle, Deborah, Robert J. Panzer, & Tracy Baird. (2002). Using Administrative Data to Improve Compliance with Mandatory State Event Reporting. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement. 28(6). 349–358. 19 indexed citations
15.
Paul, David A., Kathleen H Leef, Anthony Sciscione, Deborah Tuttle, & John L Stefano. (1999). Preeclampsia Does not Increase the Risk for Culture Proven Sepsis in Very Low Birth Weight Infants. American Journal of Perinatology. 16(7). 365–372. 21 indexed citations
16.
Tuttle, Deborah, et al.. (1997). SUCCESS RATES FOR LUMBAR PUNCTURE IN NEWBORNS 1080. Pediatric Research. 41. 182–182.
17.
Conard, Katrina, et al.. (1996). Hairy polyp of the oropharynx: Case report and literature review. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 31(5). 704–706. 45 indexed citations
18.
Tuttle, Deborah, et al.. (1992). Interstitial deletion of the short arm of chromosome 1 (46XY), del(1)(p13p22.3). American Journal of Medical Genetics. 44(5). 551–554. 12 indexed citations
19.
Tuttle, Deborah, et al.. (1990). Outcome Reporting to Target Areas for Quality Improvement. PubMed Central. 276–280. 1 indexed citations
20.
Cartwright, Peter S., et al.. (1970). Culdocentesis and ectopic pregnancy.. BMJ. 1(5690). 187.1–187. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026