Deborah L. Snook

768 total citations
12 papers, 617 citations indexed

About

Deborah L. Snook is a scholar working on Ecology, Environmental Chemistry and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah L. Snook has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 617 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Ecology, 6 papers in Environmental Chemistry and 3 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Deborah L. Snook's work include Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (6 papers), Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (6 papers) and Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (3 papers). Deborah L. Snook is often cited by papers focused on Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (6 papers), Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (6 papers) and Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (3 papers). Deborah L. Snook collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Deborah L. Snook's co-authors include Alexander M. Milner, Andrew J. Wade, P. G. Whitehead, Jón S. Ólafsson, John E. Brittain, Brigitte Lods‐Crozet, Emmanuel Castella, Valeria Lencioni, Kenneth Irvine and Brian Moss and has published in prestigious journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Freshwater Biology and Hydrology and earth system sciences.

In The Last Decade

Deborah L. Snook

12 papers receiving 584 citations

Peers

Deborah L. Snook
Jennifer P. Bull United Kingdom
Christiane Ilg Switzerland
Dale A. Bruns United States
Patrick Walsh United States
Ed Snucins Canada
Paula C. Furey United States
Cecilia Brand Argentina
Deborah L. Snook
Citations per year, relative to Deborah L. Snook Deborah L. Snook (= 1×) peers Ferdinand Šporka

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah L. Snook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah L. Snook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah L. Snook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah L. Snook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah L. Snook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah L. Snook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah L. Snook. The network helps show where Deborah L. Snook may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah L. Snook

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah L. Snook. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah L. Snook based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah L. Snook. Deborah L. Snook is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Hannah, David M., Lee E. Brown, Alexander M. Milner, et al.. (2006). Integrating climate–hydrology–ecology for alpine river systems. Aquatic Conservation Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. 17(6). 636–656. 91 indexed citations
2.
Snook, Deborah L. & P. G. Whitehead. (2004). Water quality and ecology of the River Lee: mass balance and a review of temporal and spatial data. Hydrology and earth system sciences. 8(4). 636–650. 19 indexed citations
3.
Wade, Andrew J., P. G. Whitehead, George M. Hornberger, & Deborah L. Snook. (2002). On modelling the flow controls on macrophyte and epiphyte dynamics in a lowland permeable catchment: the River Kennet, southern England. The Science of The Total Environment. 282-283. 375–393. 64 indexed citations
4.
Snook, Deborah L., et al.. (2002). Macrophyte and periphyton dynamics in a UK Cretaceous chalk stream: the River Kennet, a tributary of the Thames. The Science of The Total Environment. 282-283. 143–157. 59 indexed citations
5.
Snook, Deborah L. & Alexander M. Milner. (2002). Biological traits of macroinvertebrates and hydraulic conditions in a glacier-fed catchment (French Pyrenées). Fundamental and Applied Limnology / Archiv für Hydrobiologie. 153(2). 245–271. 45 indexed citations
6.
Lods‐Crozet, Brigitte, Valeria Lencioni, Jón S. Ólafsson, et al.. (2001). Chironomid (Diptera: Chironomidae) communities in six European glacier‐fed streams. Freshwater Biology. 46(12). 1791–1809. 89 indexed citations
7.
Castella, Emmanuel, Hákon Aðalsteinsson, John E. Brittain, et al.. (2001). Macrobenthic invertebrate richness and composition along a latitudinal gradient of European glacier‐fed streams. Freshwater Biology. 46(12). 1811–1831. 127 indexed citations
8.
Snook, Deborah L. & Alexander M. Milner. (2001). The influence of glacial runoff on stream macroinvertebrate communities in the Taillon catchment, French Pyrénées. Freshwater Biology. 46(12). 1609–1623. 54 indexed citations
9.
Snook, Deborah L. & Alexander M. Milner. (2000). Macroinvertebrates in glacier-fed streams in the French Pyrénées. SIL Proceedings 1922-2010. 27(2). 731–734. 1 indexed citations
10.
Irvine, Kenneth, Deborah L. Snook, & Brian Moss. (1995). Life histories ofNeomysis integer, and its copepod prey,Eurytemora affinis, in a eutrophic and brackish shallow lake. Hydrobiologia. 304(1). 59–76. 19 indexed citations
12.
Irvine, Kenneth, et al.. (1990). Trophic relations in Hickling Broad — a shallow and brackish eutrophic lake. SIL Proceedings 1922-2010. 24(1). 576–579. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026