Dean Ingwersen

576 total citations
18 papers, 411 citations indexed

About

Dean Ingwersen is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecological Modeling and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Dean Ingwersen has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 411 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Ecology, 8 papers in Ecological Modeling and 7 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Dean Ingwersen's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (11 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (8 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (5 papers). Dean Ingwersen is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (11 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (8 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (5 papers). Dean Ingwersen collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Dean Ingwersen's co-authors include Rohan H. Clarke, G. L. Taylor, John G. Ewen, Stefano Canessa, Doug P. Armstrong, Philip J. Seddon, Ross Crates, Dejan Stojanović, Robert Heinsohn and Laura Rayner and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Trends in Ecology & Evolution.

In The Last Decade

Dean Ingwersen

18 papers receiving 403 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Dean Ingwersen Australia	11	278	128	127	109	55	18	411
Chris Hallam United States	7	337 1.2×	162 1.3×	77 0.6×	95 0.9×	41 0.7×	10	447
Marcela Guimarães Moreira Lima Brazil	11	262 0.9×	118 0.9×	108 0.9×	84 0.8×	61 1.1×	26	394
Simon P. Mahood Australia	13	279 1.0×	101 0.8×	133 1.0×	59 0.5×	50 0.9×	24	405
Karl Mokross Brazil	9	184 0.7×	79 0.6×	146 1.1×	150 1.4×	34 0.6×	13	298
Carl Træholt Denmark	11	251 0.9×	91 0.7×	76 0.6×	94 0.9×	29 0.5×	23	359
Adrienne L. Contasti Canada	7	332 1.2×	73 0.6×	100 0.8×	98 0.9×	60 1.1×	9	397
Susan E. Koenig United States	9	225 0.8×	76 0.6×	132 1.0×	130 1.2×	47 0.9×	11	334
Emanuel H. Martin Italy	11	564 2.0×	276 2.2×	124 1.0×	110 1.0×	53 1.0×	20	665
Ana Filipa Palmeirim United Kingdom	13	275 1.0×	118 0.9×	174 1.4×	130 1.2×	28 0.5×	49	436
James Brazill‐Boast Australia	12	269 1.0×	134 1.0×	137 1.1×	196 1.8×	58 1.1×	24	479

Countries citing papers authored by Dean Ingwersen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dean Ingwersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dean Ingwersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dean Ingwersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dean Ingwersen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dean Ingwersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dean Ingwersen. The network helps show where Dean Ingwersen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dean Ingwersen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dean Ingwersen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dean Ingwersen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dean Ingwersen. Dean Ingwersen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

18 of 18 papers shown

Crates, Ross, David M. Watson, Gregory F. Albery, et al.. (2022). Mistletoes could moderate drought impacts on birds, but are themselves susceptible to drought-induced dieback. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 289(1978). 20220358–20220358. 10 indexed citations

Crates, Ross, et al.. (2022). Towards effective management of an overabundant native bird: The noisy miner. Conservation Science and Practice. 5(2). 3 indexed citations

Heinsohn, Robert, Robert C. Lacy, Dean Ingwersen, et al.. (2022). Population viability in data deficient nomadic species: What it will take to save regent honeyeaters from extinction. Biological Conservation. 266. 109430–109430. 20 indexed citations

Reside, April E., Jeremy S. Simmonds, Paul G. McDonald, et al.. (2021). Evaluating the evidence of culling a native species for conservation benefits. Conservation Science and Practice. 3(12). 10 indexed citations

Stojanović, Dejan, Laura Rayner, Ayesha Tulloch, et al.. (2021). A range‐wide monitoring programme for a critically endangered nomadic bird. Austral Ecology. 47(2). 251–260. 10 indexed citations

Crates, Ross, Naomi E. Langmore, Louis Ranjard, et al.. (2021). Loss of vocal culture and fitness costs in a critically endangered songbird. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 288(1947). 20210225–20210225. 46 indexed citations

Tripovich, Joy S., et al.. (2021). Born to Be Wild: Evaluating the Zoo-Based Regent Honeyeater Breed for Release Program to Optimise Individual Success and Conservation Outcomes in the Wild. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. 18 indexed citations

Canessa, Stefano, et al.. (2019). Risk aversion and uncertainty create a conundrum for planning recovery of a critically endangered species. Conservation Science and Practice. 2(2). 28 indexed citations

Crates, Ross, George Olah, Marcin Adamski, et al.. (2019). Genomic impact of severe population decline in a nomadic songbird. PLoS ONE. 14(10). e0223953–e0223953. 19 indexed citations

10.

Taylor, G. L., et al.. (2018). Video monitoring reveals novel threat to Critically Endangered captive-bred and released Regent Honeyeaters. Emu - Austral Ornithology. 118(3). 304–310. 9 indexed citations

11.

Taylor, G. L., Stefano Canessa, Rohan H. Clarke, et al.. (2017). Is Reintroduction Biology an Effective Applied Science?. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 32(11). 873–880. 121 indexed citations

12.

Crates, Ross, Aleks Terauds, Laura Rayner, et al.. (2017). An occupancy approach to monitoring regent honeyeaters. Journal of Wildlife Management. 81(4). 669–677. 21 indexed citations

13.

Thomson, James R., Martine Maron, Merilyn J. Grey, et al.. (2015). Avifaunal disarray: quantifying models of the occurrence and ecological effects of a despotic bird species. Diversity and Distributions. 21(4). 451–464. 33 indexed citations

14.

Ingwersen, Dean, et al.. (2015). Very Low Population Structure in a Highly Mobile and Wide-Ranging Endangered Bird Species. PLoS ONE. 10(12). e0143746–e0143746. 20 indexed citations

15.

Roderick, Michael L., et al.. (2014). Significant breeding event of Regent Honeyeaters Anthochaera phrygia near Kurri Kurri, New South Wales, during spring 2007. Australian field ornithology. 31(3). 113. 2 indexed citations

16.

Herrod, Ashley, et al.. (2013). Tracking devices attached with harnesses influence behaviour but not body mass of Princess Parrots Polytelis alexandrae. Journal für Ornithologie. 155(2). 519–529. 7 indexed citations

17.

Ingwersen, Dean, et al.. (2008). Sustainability of a long-term volunteer-based bird monitoring program Recruitment, retention and attrition. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 13(1). 48–53. 18 indexed citations

18.

Weston, Michael A., et al.. (2006). A Survey of Contributors to an Australian Bird Atlassing Project: Demography, Skills and Motivation. 11(2). 51. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact