Dean F. Stauffer

1.0k total citations
33 papers, 762 citations indexed

About

Dean F. Stauffer is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Dean F. Stauffer has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 762 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Ecology, 12 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 7 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Dean F. Stauffer's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (16 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (14 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (10 papers). Dean F. Stauffer is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (16 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (14 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (10 papers). Dean F. Stauffer collaborates with scholars based in United States, Madagascar and France. Dean F. Stauffer's co-authors include Todd M. Fearer, Marcella J. Kelly, Michelle Davis, Patrick K. Devers, William J. McShea, Frank Koch, William M. Healy, Darroch M. Whitaker, G W H Norman and R. Kirk Steinhorst and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Dean F. Stauffer

31 papers receiving 686 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dean F. Stauffer United States 16 563 298 225 123 97 33 762
Jeffrey J. Lusk United States 17 646 1.1× 305 1.0× 215 1.0× 173 1.4× 131 1.4× 33 894
Anthony D. Arthur Australia 16 666 1.2× 344 1.2× 190 0.8× 111 0.9× 118 1.2× 39 876
Riccardo Scalerà Italy 13 425 0.8× 242 0.8× 186 0.8× 181 1.5× 126 1.3× 25 670
Mikael Nordström Finland 10 853 1.5× 270 0.9× 170 0.8× 118 1.0× 202 2.1× 11 988
M. L. Pope Australia 15 673 1.2× 409 1.4× 190 0.8× 233 1.9× 96 1.0× 21 832
Adriana de Arruda Bueno Brazil 9 366 0.7× 340 1.1× 242 1.1× 118 1.0× 164 1.7× 10 695
C. Ronald Carroll United States 3 279 0.5× 230 0.8× 149 0.7× 88 0.7× 103 1.1× 3 635
Cameron S. Gillies Canada 8 910 1.6× 311 1.0× 222 1.0× 167 1.4× 126 1.3× 12 1.0k
Scott Schlossberg United States 16 919 1.6× 391 1.3× 332 1.5× 181 1.5× 203 2.1× 29 1.1k
Fumito Koike Japan 17 375 0.7× 357 1.2× 239 1.1× 128 1.0× 170 1.8× 47 803

Countries citing papers authored by Dean F. Stauffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dean F. Stauffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dean F. Stauffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dean F. Stauffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dean F. Stauffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dean F. Stauffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dean F. Stauffer. The network helps show where Dean F. Stauffer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dean F. Stauffer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dean F. Stauffer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dean F. Stauffer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dean F. Stauffer. Dean F. Stauffer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Orth, Donald J., et al.. (2020). Are Road Crossings Fragmenting Populations of Clinch Dace?. Northeastern Naturalist. 27(4).
2.
Stauffer, Dean F.. (2017). Quail Methodology: Where are We and Where Do We Need to Be?. National Quail Symposium Proceedings. 3. 4 indexed citations
3.
Stauffer, Dean F., et al.. (2017). Landscape-level habitat use and movement patterns of black bears in northeastern Arizona. The Southwestern Naturalist. 62(1). 85–91. 1 indexed citations
4.
Leuschner, William A. & Dean F. Stauffer. (2016). OPINIONS ON WILDLIFE: RESPONSES OF RESOURCE MANAGERS AND WILDLIFE USERS IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES. 17(1). 24–29. 3 indexed citations
5.
Farris, Zach J., Christopher D. Golden, Sarah M. Karpanty, et al.. (2015). Hunting, Exotic Carnivores, and Habitat Loss: Anthropogenic Effects on a Native Carnivore Community, Madagascar. PLoS ONE. 10(9). e0136456–e0136456. 60 indexed citations
6.
Stauffer, Dean F., et al.. (2011). Enhancing Wildlife Habitat on Reclaimed Mine Lands. VTechWorks (Virginia Tech). 2 indexed citations
7.
Davis, Michelle, Marcella J. Kelly, & Dean F. Stauffer. (2010). Carnivore co-existence and habitat use in the Mountain Pine Ridge Forest Reserve, Belize. Animal Conservation. 14(1). 56–65. 101 indexed citations
8.
Fearer, Todd M., Stephen P. Prisley, Dean F. Stauffer, & Patrick D. Keyser. (2007). A method for integrating the Breeding Bird Survey and Forest Inventory and Analysis databases to evaluate forest bird–habitat relationships at multiple spatial scales. Forest Ecology and Management. 243(1). 128–143. 32 indexed citations
9.
McShea, William J., William M. Healy, Patrick K. Devers, et al.. (2007). Forestry Matters: Decline of Oaks Will Impact Wildlife in Hardwood Forests. Journal of Wildlife Management. 71(5). 1717–1728. 171 indexed citations
10.
Whitaker, Darroch M., Dean F. Stauffer, G W H Norman, et al.. (2007). FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH VARIATION IN HOME-RANGE SIZE OF APPALACHIAN RUFFED GROUSE (BONASA UMBELLUS). The Auk. 124(4). 1407–1407. 17 indexed citations
11.
Tirpak, John M., William M. Giuliano, Christine Miller, et al.. (2006). Ruffed grouse population dynamics in the central and southern Appalachians. Biological Conservation. 133(3). 364–378. 15 indexed citations
12.
Whitaker, Darroch M., et al.. (2005). A RANGE‐WIDE META‐ANALYSIS OF WILD TURKEY NESTING PHENOLOGY AND SPRING SEASON OPENING DATES. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2005(S1). 351–360. 7 indexed citations
13.
Fearer, Todd M. & Dean F. Stauffer. (2004). Relationship of ruffed grouse Bonasa umbellus to landscape characteristics in southwest Virginia, USA. Wildlife Biology. 10(2). 81–89. 7 indexed citations
14.
Stauffer, Dean F., et al.. (2003). Ruffed Grouse (Bonasa umbellus) Brood Microhabitat Selection in the Southern Appalachians. The American Midland Naturalist. 150(1). 95–103. 24 indexed citations
15.
Stauffer, Dean F., et al.. (1999). Biotic Surveys of Bioko and Rio Muni, Equatorial Guinea. AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 7 indexed citations
16.
Stauffer, Dean F., et al.. (1993). Evaluating Micro-habitat Selection by Northern Bobwhite in Virginia. 8 indexed citations
17.
Rosenberg, Daniel K., James D. Fraser, & Dean F. Stauffer. (1988). Use and Characteristics of Snags in Young and Old Forest Stands in Southwest Virginia. Forest Science. 34(1). 224–228. 40 indexed citations
18.
Stauffer, Dean F., et al.. (1986). Nestling Great Crested Flycatcher Parasitized by Larval Fly (protocalliphora Hirudo). Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida). 1 indexed citations
19.
Stauffer, Dean F., Edward O. Garton, & R. Kirk Steinhorst. (1985). A Comparison of Principal Components from Real and Random Data. Ecology. 66(6). 1693–1698. 40 indexed citations
20.
Best, Louis B., et al.. (1981). Effects of habitat alterations on riparian plant and animal communities in Iowa. FWS/OBS. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026