D.E. Johnson

631 total citations
71 papers, 365 citations indexed

About

D.E. Johnson is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, D.E. Johnson has authored 71 papers receiving a total of 365 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 53 papers in Aerospace Engineering, 51 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 41 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in D.E. Johnson's work include Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (52 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (50 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (38 papers). D.E. Johnson is often cited by papers focused on Particle accelerators and beam dynamics (52 papers), Particle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers (50 papers) and Superconducting Materials and Applications (38 papers). D.E. Johnson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Russia and Canada. D.E. Johnson's co-authors include Floyd D. McDaniel, George Basbas, J. Z. Larese, D. Herrup, R. P. Johnson, J. B. Hastings, D. P. Siddons, M. Syphers, Bruce Brown and M. Hasinoff and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.

In The Last Decade

D.E. Johnson

58 papers receiving 334 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
D.E. Johnson United States 10 137 119 118 95 81 71 365
C. M. Scoby United States 11 156 1.1× 232 1.9× 64 0.5× 149 1.6× 207 2.6× 15 533
Christian Roux Germany 13 76 0.6× 82 0.7× 57 0.5× 79 0.8× 200 2.5× 38 493
J. T. Moody United States 11 185 1.4× 284 2.4× 91 0.8× 114 1.2× 238 2.9× 27 579
Kyo Nakajima Japan 10 179 1.3× 148 1.2× 50 0.4× 44 0.5× 141 1.7× 41 412
Shigeru Kashiwagi Japan 9 129 0.9× 255 2.1× 94 0.8× 58 0.6× 196 2.4× 83 415
A. D. Holland United Kingdom 8 100 0.7× 180 1.5× 76 0.6× 36 0.4× 37 0.5× 19 301
A. Miahnahri United States 5 217 1.6× 277 2.3× 120 1.0× 56 0.6× 160 2.0× 8 451
G. Zschornack Germany 15 231 1.7× 166 1.4× 167 1.4× 51 0.5× 436 5.4× 96 722
Giuseppe Tondello Italy 11 95 0.7× 108 0.9× 29 0.2× 67 0.7× 285 3.5× 57 453
Sharon Vetter United States 10 202 1.5× 188 1.6× 37 0.3× 25 0.3× 179 2.2× 18 409

Countries citing papers authored by D.E. Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D.E. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.E. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.E. Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D.E. Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.E. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.E. Johnson. The network helps show where D.E. Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D.E. Johnson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D.E. Johnson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D.E. Johnson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D.E. Johnson. D.E. Johnson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Belomestnykh, S., et al.. (2023). An 8 GeV linac as the Booster replacement in the Fermilab Power Upgrade. Journal of Instrumentation. 18(7). T07009–T07009.
2.
Cousineau, Sarah, A. Rakhman, A. Aleksandrov, et al.. (2017). First Demonstration of Laser-Assisted Charge Exchange for Microsecond Duration H Beams. Physical Review Letters. 118(7). 74801–74801. 13 indexed citations
3.
Johnson, D.E., Valeri Lebedev, & Igor Rakhno. (2015). Fermilab Booster Injection Upgrade to 800 MeV for PIP-II. JACOW. 3986–3988. 1 indexed citations
4.
Johnson, D.E., et al.. (2012). The Project-X 3 GeV Beam Distribution System. Presented at. 2651–2653. 1 indexed citations
5.
Gohar, Y., et al.. (2011). Fermilab Project X nuclear energy application: Accelerator, spallation target and transmutation technology demonstration. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 1 indexed citations
6.
Brown, Bruce, P. Adamson, D. Capista, et al.. (2009). Fermilab Main Injector Collimation Systems: Design, Commissioning and Operation. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 2 indexed citations
7.
Grim, G. P., G. L. Morgan, J. A. Oertel, et al.. (2008). A spatially resolved ion temperature diagnostic for the National Ignition Facility. Review of Scientific Instruments. 79(10). 10E537–10E537. 1 indexed citations
8.
Johnson, D.E., et al.. (2007). An 8 GEV H- multi-turn injection system for the Fermilab Main Injector. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 1700–1702. 2 indexed citations
9.
Xiao, M., Ming-Jen Yang, D.E. Johnson, & Y. Alexahin. (2006). Study of Coupling Issues in the Recycler at Fermilab. Proceedings of the 2005 Particle Accelerator Conference. 3209–3211. 1 indexed citations
10.
Xiao, M., Ming-Jen Yang, D.E. Johnson, & Y. Alexahin. (2005). The study on coupling issues in the Recycler at Fermilab. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 505161. 3209. 1 indexed citations
11.
Johnson, D.E. & R. P. Johnson. (2003). The Colliding Beams Sequencer. 1657–1659. 3 indexed citations
12.
Johnson, D.E., et al.. (2002). Design and simulation of the antiproton Recycler lattice. Proceedings of the 1997 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.97CH36167). 1. 997–999. 2 indexed citations
13.
Wan, Wei, et al.. (2002). Design and implementation of the medium-beta insert of the Fermilab Recycler Ring. PACS2001. Proceedings of the 2001 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.01CH37268). 5. 3621–3623. 1 indexed citations
14.
Mishra, C. S. & D.E. Johnson. (1999). Simulation of the Recycler Ring dynamic aperture. Proceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelerator Conference (Cat. No.99CH36366). 22. 2647–2649 vol.4. 1 indexed citations
15.
Yarba, V.A., et al.. (1993). Modification of the Short Straight Sections of the High-Energy Booster of the SSC. Presented at. 236–238. 1 indexed citations
16.
Johnson, D.E. & D. Herrup. (1989). Compensation of Time Varying Fields in the Tevatron Superconducting Magnets. pac. 521.
17.
Kane, Robert L, et al.. (1984). An evaluation of the Digit Symbol component of the Russell, Neuringer, and Goldstein Average Impairment Rating.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 52(2). 317–318. 1 indexed citations
18.
Marg, Elwin, et al.. (1977). Computer-assisted Eye Examination. V. Preliminary Evaluation of the Refractor III System for Subjective Examination. Optometry and Vision Science. 54(1). 2–18. 1 indexed citations
19.
Collins, T., et al.. (1975). Progress Report on the POPAE Design Study. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 22(3). 1411–1415. 1 indexed citations
20.
Johnson, D.E., et al.. (1975). Dielectric Property Measurements on Large Alumina Vacuum Seals Used on Fermilab Accelerator RF Cavities. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 22(3). 1296–1298. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026