D.D. Miller

1.3k total citations
31 papers, 970 citations indexed

About

D.D. Miller is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, D.D. Miller has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 970 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Plant Science, 8 papers in Molecular Biology and 5 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in D.D. Miller's work include Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (16 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (12 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (6 papers). D.D. Miller is often cited by papers focused on Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (16 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (12 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (6 papers). D.D. Miller collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. D.D. Miller's co-authors include Peter K. Hepler, Dale Callaham, Grant R. Hackett, Jan van Aken, E. S. Pierson, A. Shipley, Bruce A. Rivers, E.S. Pierson, M. Cresti and Susan A. Lancelle and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Plant Cell and New Phytologist.

In The Last Decade

D.D. Miller

29 papers receiving 900 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
D.D. Miller United States	10	784	666	166	98	59	31	970
Terri L. Lomax United States	21	1.1k 1.4×	1.1k 1.6×	109 0.7×	45 0.5×	9 0.2×	33	1.4k
Sandra Stegemann Germany	10	622 0.8×	778 1.2×	136 0.8×	54 0.6×	10 0.2×	10	1.1k
Chen‐Tran Hsu Taiwan	11	448 0.6×	733 1.1×	230 1.4×	46 0.5×	26 0.4×	13	820
Ratnesh Chandra Mishra India	14	514 0.7×	314 0.5×	60 0.4×	79 0.8×	27 0.5×	18	661
R. Hertel Germany	15	835 1.1×	686 1.0×	77 0.5×	24 0.2×	25 0.4×	27	1.1k
K. K. Nanda India	15	682 0.9×	420 0.6×	106 0.6×	49 0.5×	19 0.3×	99	880
Sandra S. Scholz Germany	18	767 1.0×	253 0.4×	81 0.5×	68 0.7×	24 0.4×	29	882
Jill M. Picton United Kingdom	7	348 0.4×	452 0.7×	158 1.0×	73 0.7×	16 0.3×	8	521
Mei‐Jane Fang Taiwan	9	323 0.4×	288 0.4×	49 0.3×	184 1.9×	44 0.7×	11	650
Marı́a Luz Centeno Spain	20	756 1.0×	593 0.9×	79 0.5×	102 1.0×	15 0.3×	46	983

Countries citing papers authored by D.D. Miller

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D.D. Miller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D.D. Miller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D.D. Miller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D.D. Miller

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D.D. Miller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D.D. Miller. The network helps show where D.D. Miller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D.D. Miller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D.D. Miller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D.D. Miller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D.D. Miller. D.D. Miller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Williamson, Kathryn, et al.. (2021). Integrating genomics and multiplatform metabolomics enables metabolite quantitative trait loci detection in breeding‐relevant apple germplasm. New Phytologist. 232(5). 1944–1958. 13 indexed citations

Hoover, Emily, Richard P. Marini, Wesley R. Autio, et al.. (2012). eApples: A Case Study in Using eXtension to Increase Access to Research-based Information. HortTechnology. 22(5). 576–579.

Anderson, Randy L., Wesley R. Autio, T.G. Beckman, et al.. (2011). Performance of the 2002 NC-140 Cooperative PeachRootstock Planting. Journal of American Pomological Society. 65(1). 17–25. 1 indexed citations

Autio, Wesley R., T.L. Robinson, Mosbah M. Kushad, et al.. (2011). PERFORMANCE OF 'GALA' APPLE TREES ON SUPPORTER 4 AND DIFFERENT STRAINS OF B.9, M.9, AND M.26 ROOTSTOCKS AS PART OF THE 2002 NC-140 APPLE ROOTSTOCK TRIAL. Acta Horticulturae. 311–318. 3 indexed citations

Racskó, J., D.D. Miller, L Lakatos, et al.. (2011). INFLUENCE OF CULTIVARS AND ROOTSTOCKS ON THE INCIDENCE OF SUNBURN DAMAGE ON APPLE FRUIT IN THE NORTHERN AND SOUTHERN HEMISPHERES. Acta Horticulturae. 1041–1048. 2 indexed citations

Volk, Gayle M., Christopher M. Richards, Adam D. Henk, et al.. (2009). Novel Diversity Identified in a Wild Apple Population from the Kyrgyz Republic. HortScience. 44(2). 516–518. 12 indexed citations

Racskó, J., D.D. Miller, Emília Duarte, et al.. (2009). Consumer preference for apples: the role of attributes influencing the choice and consumption. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 15(1-2). 1 indexed citations

Racskó, J., et al.. (2009). IS CONSUMER PREFERENCE FOR APPLE DRIVEN ONLY BY FRUIT QUALITY?. Acta Horticulturae. 331–338. 8 indexed citations

Scheerens, Joseph C., Artemio Z. Tulio, Mustafa Özgen, et al.. (2005). (386) The Commercial Potential and Antioxidant Characteristics of Unique Varietal Grape Juices. HortScience. 40(4). 1069E–1070. 1 indexed citations

10.

Zwet, Tom van der, et al.. (2004). `Shenandoah': A New Fire Blight-resistant Pear Cultivar. HortScience. 39(4). 805A–805. 1 indexed citations

11.

Pierson, E. S., D.D. Miller, Dale Callaham, et al.. (1996). Tip-Localized Calcium Entry Fluctuates during Pollen Tube Growth. Developmental Biology. 174(1). 160–173. 320 indexed citations

12.

Pierson, E.S., D.D. Miller, Dale Callaham, et al.. (1994). Pollen tube growth is coupled to the extracellular calcium ion flux and the intracellular calcium gradient: effect of BAPTA-type buffers and hypertonic media.. The Plant Cell. 6(12). 1815–1828. 306 indexed citations

13.

Chandler, Craig K., D.D. Miller, & David C. Ferree. (1992). Shade during July and August Reduces Growth but Not Fruiting of Strawberry Plants. HortScience. 27(9). 1044–1044. 7 indexed citations

14.

Miller, D.D., et al.. (1989). Effect of Seed Weight on Emergence and Seedling Vigor of Chinese Chestnut. HortScience. 24(3). 516–516. 5 indexed citations

15.

Miller, D.D., et al.. (1989). Spread of endomycorrhizal colonization and effects on growth of apple seedlings. New Phytologist. 111(1). 51–59. 12 indexed citations

16.

Miller, D.D., et al.. (1988). Micropropagation of apomictic Malus clones of diverse ploidy level and parentage. 295. 42–45. 3 indexed citations

17.

Schüepp, H., et al.. (1987). A new technique for monitoring hyphal growth of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi through soil. Transactions of the British Mycological Society. 89(4). 429–435. 39 indexed citations

18.

Miller, D.D. & Christopher Walker. (1986). Glomus maculosum sp. nov. (Endogonaceae): an endomycorrhizal fungus. Mycotaxon. 25(1). 217–227. 5 indexed citations

19.

Miller, D.D., Paul A. Domoto, & Christopher Walker. (1985). COLONIZATION AND EFFICACY OF DIFFERENT ENDOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGI WITH APPLE SEEDLINGS AT TWO PHOSPHORUS LEVELS. New Phytologist. 100(3). 393–402. 28 indexed citations

20.

Miller, D.D., Paul A. Domoto, & Christopher Walker. (1985). MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI AT EIGHTEEN APPLE ROOTSTOCK PLANTINGS IN THE UNITED STATES. New Phytologist. 100(3). 379–391. 47 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact