David Woolger

425 total citations
9 papers, 207 citations indexed

About

David Woolger is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Cognitive Neuroscience and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, David Woolger has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 207 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials. Recurrent topics in David Woolger's work include Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (8 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers) and Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (3 papers). David Woolger is often cited by papers focused on Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (8 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers) and Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (3 papers). David Woolger collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. David Woolger's co-authors include Niall Holmes, Matthew J. Brookes, Richard Bowtell, James Osborne, Ryan M. Hill, Elena Boto, Vishal Shah, Molly Rea, James Leggett and Kristina Safar and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, NeuroImage and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

David Woolger

8 papers receiving 200 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Woolger United Kingdom 6 141 69 65 38 34 9 207
Lukas Rier United Kingdom 9 162 1.1× 77 1.1× 131 2.0× 25 0.7× 36 1.1× 18 256
Christoph Pfeiffer Sweden 10 114 0.8× 63 0.9× 76 1.2× 21 0.6× 47 1.4× 22 212
Kaiyan He China 5 126 0.9× 78 1.1× 51 0.8× 24 0.6× 22 0.6× 11 169
Cody Doyle United Kingdom 6 190 1.3× 92 1.3× 122 1.9× 34 0.9× 26 0.8× 10 237
Binbin Zhao China 10 220 1.6× 112 1.6× 7 0.1× 31 0.8× 46 1.4× 33 323
W. J. Cummings United States 7 120 0.9× 14 0.2× 12 0.2× 20 0.5× 34 1.0× 15 264
M. Żołądź Poland 8 70 0.5× 29 0.4× 40 0.6× 84 2.2× 115 3.4× 38 220
Jamie D. Reynolds United Kingdom 10 113 0.8× 47 0.7× 12 0.2× 73 1.9× 235 6.9× 24 363
Matlabjon Sattorov South Korea 10 171 1.2× 7 0.1× 15 0.2× 46 1.2× 173 5.1× 41 283
Giovanni Cennini Germany 9 242 1.7× 19 0.3× 22 0.3× 90 2.4× 30 0.9× 16 361

Countries citing papers authored by David Woolger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Woolger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Woolger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Woolger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Woolger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Woolger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Woolger. The network helps show where David Woolger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Woolger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Woolger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Woolger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Woolger. David Woolger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Holmes, Niall, et al.. (2025). Magnetic field interaction with high-permeability planar passive shields. Journal of Applied Physics. 138(10).
2.
Holmes, Niall, James Leggett, Ryan M. Hill, et al.. (2024). Wearable Magnetoencephalography in a Lightly Shielded Environment. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 72(2). 609–618. 6 indexed citations
3.
Holmes, Niall, J. Alan Chalmers, C. T. Morley, et al.. (2023). Benchtop Magnetic Shielding for Benchmarking Atomic Magnetometers. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. 72. 1–9. 11 indexed citations
4.
Hill, Ryan M., Niall Holmes, Elena Boto, et al.. (2022). Using OPM-MEG in contrasting magnetic environments. NeuroImage. 253. 119084–119084. 52 indexed citations
5.
Boto, Elena, Vishal Shah, Ryan M. Hill, et al.. (2022). Quantum enabled functional neuroimaging: the why and how of magnetoencephalography using optically pumped magnetometers. Contemporary Physics. 63(3). 161–179. 23 indexed citations
6.
Rea, Molly, Niall Holmes, Ryan M. Hill, et al.. (2021). Precision magnetic field modelling and control for wearable magnetoencephalography. NeuroImage. 241. 118401–118401. 81 indexed citations
7.
Holmes, Niall, James D. Chalmers, David Woolger, et al.. (2021). Optimised hybrid shielding and magnetic field control for emerging quantum technologies. Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham). 9. 35–35. 4 indexed citations
8.
Vovrosh, Jamie, Plamen G. Petrov, Ji Zou, et al.. (2018). Additive manufacturing of magnetic shielding and ultra-high vacuum flange for cold atom sensors. Scientific Reports. 8(1). 2023–2023. 26 indexed citations
9.
Wallace, Mike & David Woolger. (1991). Improving the ELT supervisory dialogue: the Sri Lankan experience. ELT Journal. 45(4). 320–327. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026