Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Is the Cerebellum a Smith Predictor?
1993786 citationsR. Chris Miall, David Weir et al.Journal of Motor Behaviorprofile →
Science with the space-based interferometer eLISA. II: gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions
2016563 citationsMark Hindmarsh, David Weir et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physicsprofile →
Detecting gravitational waves from cosmological phase transitions with LISA: an update
2020454 citationsMark Hindmarsh, Kari Rummukainen et al.Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physicsprofile →
Numerical simulations of acoustically generated gravitational waves at a first order phase transition
2015356 citationsMark Hindmarsh, Kari Rummukainen et al.profile →
Gravitational Waves from the Sound of a First Order Phase Transition
2014348 citationsMark Hindmarsh, Kari Rummukainen et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Shape of the acoustic gravitational wave power spectrum from a first order phase transition
2017282 citationsMark Hindmarsh, Kari Rummukainen et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of David Weir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Weir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Weir more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Weir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Weir. The network helps show where David Weir may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Weir
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Weir.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Weir based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Weir. David Weir is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Taylor, Joseph, Viktoriia Sharmanska, Kristian Kersting, David Weir, & Novi Quadrianto. (2016). Learning using unselected features (LUFe). Spiral (Imperial College London). 2060–2066.1 indexed citations
8.
Weir, David, et al.. (2014). Method51 for Mining Insight from Social Media Datasets. Figshare. 115–119.4 indexed citations
9.
Weeds, Julie, Daoud Clarke, Jeremy Reffin, David Weir, & Bill Keller. (2014). Learning to Distinguish Hypernyms and Co-Hyponyms. Figshare. 2249–2259.82 indexed citations
10.
Weir, David, et al.. (2013). Language Technology for Agile Social Media Science. Figshare. 36–42.3 indexed citations
11.
Weir, David & Simon Catterall. (2013). Eigenvalue spectrum of lattice N = 4 super Yang-Mills. arXiv (Cornell University).2 indexed citations
12.
Bollegala, Danushka, David Weir, & John M. Carroll. (2011). Using Multiple Sources to Construct a Sentiment Sensitive Thesaurus for Cross-Domain Sentiment Classification. Figshare. 1. 132–141.84 indexed citations
13.
Gómez‐Rodríguez, Carlos, John M. Carroll, & David Weir. (2008). A Deductive Approach to Dependency Parsing. Figshare. 968–976.13 indexed citations
14.
Hutchings, Kate & David Weir. (2005). Cultural Embeddedness and Contextual Constraints: Knowledge Sharing in Chinese and Arab Cultures. QUT Business School.2 indexed citations
15.
Clark, Stephen & David Weir. (1999). An Iterative Approach to Estimating Frequencies over a Semantic Hierarchy. Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex).13 indexed citations
16.
Evans, Roger & David Weir. (1997). Automaton-based parsing for lexicalized grammars. Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex). 66–76.7 indexed citations
17.
Vijay‐Shanker, K., David Weir, & Owen Rambow. (1995). Parsing D-Tree Grammars. Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex). 252–259.9 indexed citations
18.
Vijay‐Shanker, K. & David Weir. (1993). Parsing some constrained grammar formalisms. Computational Linguistics. 19(4). 591–636.50 indexed citations
19.
Miall, R. Chris, David Weir, Daniel M. Wolpert, & John Stein. (1993). Is the Cerebellum a Smith Predictor?. Journal of Motor Behavior. 25(3). 203–216.786 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Vijay‐Shanker, K. & David Weir. (1989). Recognition of Combinatory Categorial Grammars and Linear Indexed Grammars. 172–181.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.