David W. Wright

41 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

David W. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 336
  • Information Systems and Management 23
  • Molecular Biology 192
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 17
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 15
Replace Shunzhou Wan with:
Shunzhou Wan United Kingdom
Austin Clyde United States
Nikolaus Stiefl Switzerland
Christopher J. Woods United Kingdom
Jeremy J. Yang United States
Saqib Mir United Kingdom
Lora Mak United Kingdom
Jörg Schaarschmidt Germany
Konstantin Fackeldey Germany
Stefan Doerr Spain
David W. Wright relative to Shunzhou Wan United Kingdom Shunzhou Wan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Shunzhou Wan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David W. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David W. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David W. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David W. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David W. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David W. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David W. Wright. The network helps show where David W. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David W. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David W. Wright Line = papers co-authored together David W. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014123
2 2016121
3 2015106
4 201083
5 201666
6 200853
7 201444
8 201337
9 202037
10 201530
11 202029
12 201526
13 201725
14 201925
15 201221
16 201721
17 201516
18 201916
19 202016
20 201415

About David W. Wright

David W. Wright is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Infectious Diseases, Molecular Biology, Immunology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (14 papers), HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment (3 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (3 papers), Complement system in diseases (2 papers), Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations (1 paper), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (1 paper), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (1 paper) and Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (336 citations), Information Systems and Management (23 citations), Molecular Biology (192 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (17 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (15 citations). David W. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Peter V. Coveney, Shunzhou Wan, S. Kashif Sadiq, Agastya P. Bhati, Shantenu Jha, Stephen J. Perkins, Benjamin A. Hall, Charlotte Mary Deane, Bernhard Knapp and Stefan J. Zasada. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, Biochemical Journal, Advanced Theory and Simulations and Interface Focus.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact