David Stoler

3.9k total citations · 2 hit papers
24 papers, 3.0k citations indexed

About

David Stoler is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Artificial Intelligence and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, David Stoler has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 3.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 17 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 5 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in David Stoler's work include Quantum Information and Cryptography (17 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (13 papers) and Quantum optics and atomic interactions (6 papers). David Stoler is often cited by papers focused on Quantum Information and Cryptography (17 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (13 papers) and Quantum optics and atomic interactions (6 papers). David Stoler collaborates with scholars based in United States. David Stoler's co-authors include Bernard Yurke, Bahaa E. A. Saleh, Malvin C. Teich, M. C. Teich, Stanton Newman and Mark Hillery and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physical Review A and Optics Letters.

In The Last Decade

David Stoler

24 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Hit Papers

Generating quantum mechanical superpositions of macroscop... 1970 2026 1988 2007 1986 1970 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Stoler United States 17 2.8k 2.3k 341 204 60 24 3.0k
K. Wódkiewicz United States 28 3.3k 1.2× 2.1k 0.9× 524 1.5× 251 1.2× 87 1.4× 85 3.6k
Daniel Braun Germany 27 2.5k 0.9× 2.2k 0.9× 517 1.5× 227 1.1× 37 0.6× 105 3.1k
Tomáš Opatrný Czechia 23 1.8k 0.7× 1.4k 0.6× 299 0.9× 155 0.8× 26 0.4× 76 2.1k
Alfredo Luis Spain 25 2.2k 0.8× 1.6k 0.7× 353 1.0× 285 1.4× 47 0.8× 179 2.5k
C. L. Mehta India 23 1.3k 0.4× 737 0.3× 376 1.1× 111 0.5× 50 0.8× 65 1.5k
S. J. van Enk United States 31 3.4k 1.2× 2.7k 1.2× 320 0.9× 372 1.8× 57 0.9× 117 3.7k
Hai-Woong Lee South Korea 21 1.4k 0.5× 895 0.4× 342 1.0× 155 0.8× 59 1.0× 50 1.6k
W. M. Itano United States 12 3.4k 1.2× 2.4k 1.0× 207 0.6× 169 0.8× 29 0.5× 13 3.6k
Erik Sjöqvist Sweden 29 3.0k 1.1× 2.2k 1.0× 394 1.2× 134 0.7× 69 1.1× 130 3.3k
Daniel K. L. Oi United Kingdom 27 2.2k 0.8× 1.9k 0.8× 228 0.7× 234 1.1× 31 0.5× 75 2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by David Stoler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Stoler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Stoler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Stoler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Stoler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Stoler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Stoler. The network helps show where David Stoler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Stoler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Stoler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Stoler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Stoler. David Stoler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hillery, Mark, Bernard Yurke, & David Stoler. (2001). Upper and lower bounds on maximal violation of local realism in a Hardy-type test using continuous variables. Physical Review A. 63(6). 2 indexed citations
2.
Yurke, Bernard, Mark Hillery, & David Stoler. (1999). Position-momentum local-realism violation of the Hardy type. Physical Review A. 60(5). 3444–3447. 9 indexed citations
3.
Yurke, Bernard & David Stoler. (1995). Bell’s-inequality experiment employing four harmonic oscillators. Physical Review A. 51(5). 3437–3444. 5 indexed citations
4.
Yurke, Bernard & David Stoler. (1993). Using the Pauli exclusion principle to exhibit local-realism violations in overlapping interferometers. Physical Review A. 47(3). 1704–1707. 8 indexed citations
5.
Yurke, Bernard & David Stoler. (1992). Bell’s-inequality experiments using independent-particle sources. Physical Review A. 46(5). 2229–2234. 87 indexed citations
6.
Yurke, Bernard & David Stoler. (1992). Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen effects from independent particle sources. Physical Review Letters. 68(9). 1251–1254. 96 indexed citations
7.
Yurke, Bernard & David Stoler. (1988). The dynamic generation of Schrödinger cats and their detection. Physica B+C. 151(1-2). 298–301. 35 indexed citations
8.
Yurke, Bernard & David Stoler. (1987). Quantum behavior of a four-wave mixer operated in a nonlinear regime. Physical review. A, General physics. 35(11). 4846–4849. 59 indexed citations
9.
Stoler, David & Bernard Yurke. (1986). Generating antibunched light from the output of a nondegenerate frequency converter. Physical review. A, General physics. 34(4). 3143–3147. 21 indexed citations
10.
Stoler, David, Bahaa E. A. Saleh, & Malvin C. Teich. (1985). Binomial States of the Quantized Radiation Field. Optica Acta International Journal of Optics. 32(3). 345–355. 225 indexed citations
11.
Saleh, Bahaa E. A., David Stoler, & Malvin C. Teich. (1983). Coherence and photon statistics for optical fields generated by Poisson random emissions. Physical review. A, General physics. 27(1). 360–374. 31 indexed citations
12.
Teich, M. C., Bahaa E. A. Saleh, & David Stoler. (1983). Antibunching in the Franck-Hertz experiment. Optics Communications. 46(3-4). 244–248. 40 indexed citations
13.
Stoler, David. (1982). <title>Operator Methods In Physical Optics</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 358. 206–213. 2 indexed citations
14.
Stoler, David. (1981). Operator algebraic derivation of the impulse response of a lens system. Optics Letters. 6(10). 484–484. 5 indexed citations
15.
Stoler, David. (1981). Operator methods in physical optics. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 71(3). 334–334. 96 indexed citations
16.
Stoler, David. (1975). Most-general minimality-preserving Hamiltonian. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 11(10). 3033–3034. 12 indexed citations
17.
Stoler, David & Stanton Newman. (1972). Minimum uncertainty and density matrices. Physics Letters A. 38(6). 433–434. 17 indexed citations
18.
Stoler, David. (1971). Equivalence Classes of Minimum-Uncertainty Packets. II. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 4(6). 1925–1926. 231 indexed citations
19.
Stoler, David. (1971). Generalized Coherent States. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 4(8). 2309–2312. 143 indexed citations
20.
Stoler, David. (1970). Equivalence Classes of Minimum Uncertainty Packets. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 1(12). 3217–3219. 599 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026