David Smith

2.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
19 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

David Smith is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, David Smith has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 7 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 2 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in David Smith's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (16 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (11 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (7 papers). David Smith is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (16 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (11 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (7 papers). David Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States and Italy. David Smith's co-authors include Neal Weiner, Yasunori Nomura, Witold Skiba, Ian Low, Lawrence J. Hall, Nima Arkani–Hamed, Lawrence J. Hall, Алессандро Струмиа, Jay G. Wacker and Thomas Grégoire and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review B, Nuclear Physics B and Journal of High Energy Physics.

In The Last Decade

David Smith

19 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

Inelastic dark matter 2001 2026 2009 2017 2001 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Smith United States 14 1.4k 676 132 92 16 19 1.5k
Salah Nasri United Arab Emirates 30 2.6k 1.8× 878 1.3× 77 0.6× 48 0.5× 30 1.9× 114 2.6k
Nuria Rius Spain 21 1.2k 0.8× 336 0.5× 63 0.5× 45 0.5× 18 1.1× 41 1.2k
Jason Kumar United States 22 1.5k 1.0× 941 1.4× 249 1.9× 182 2.0× 15 0.9× 69 1.5k
R. J. Crewther United States 14 1.3k 0.9× 249 0.4× 207 1.6× 43 0.5× 7 0.4× 29 1.4k
S. M. Barr United States 14 1.2k 0.8× 307 0.5× 137 1.0× 38 0.4× 41 2.6× 22 1.3k
Shaaban Khalil Egypt 27 2.6k 1.8× 844 1.2× 61 0.5× 31 0.3× 43 2.7× 189 2.7k
J. Kripfganz Germany 18 1.0k 0.7× 260 0.4× 66 0.5× 91 1.0× 28 1.8× 59 1.1k
David Tucker-Smith United States 16 1.4k 0.9× 645 1.0× 144 1.1× 31 0.3× 34 2.1× 21 1.4k
V. Dmitrašinović Serbia 16 695 0.5× 164 0.2× 92 0.7× 59 0.6× 9 0.6× 77 865
Andrea Romanino Italy 23 2.2k 1.5× 698 1.0× 84 0.6× 35 0.4× 34 2.1× 42 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by David Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Smith. The network helps show where David Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Smith. David Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Hall, Lawrence J., John March-Russell, & David Smith. (2004). Towards a theory of ∞avor from orbifold GUTs. 1 indexed citations
2.
Grégoire, Thomas, David Smith, & Jay G. Wacker. (2004). What precision electroweak physics says about theSU(6)/Sp(6)little Higgs model. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 69(11). 84 indexed citations
3.
Nomura, Yasunori & David Smith. (2003). Spectrum of TeV particles in warped supersymmetric grand unification. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 68(7). 21 indexed citations
4.
Goldberger, Walter D., Yasunori Nomura, & David Smith. (2003). Warped supersymmetric grand unification. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 67(7). 59 indexed citations
5.
Smith, David & Neal Weiner. (2002). 1 Inelastic Dark Matter at DAMA, CDMS and Future Experiments. 17 indexed citations
6.
Low, Ian, Witold Skiba, & David Smith. (2002). Little Higgs bosons from an antisymmetric condensate. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 66(7). 207 indexed citations
7.
Hall, Lawrence J., Yasunori Nomura, Takemichi Okui, & David Smith. (2002). SO(10) unified theories in six dimensions. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 65(3). 101 indexed citations
8.
Hall, Lawrence J., John March-Russell, Takemichi Okui, & David Smith. (2001). Towards a theory of Flavor from Orbifold GUTs - eScholarship. 2 indexed citations
9.
Nomura, Yasunori, David Smith, & Neal Weiner. (2001). GUT breaking on the brane. Nuclear Physics B. 613(1-2). 147–166. 66 indexed citations
10.
Smith, David & Neal Weiner. (2001). Inelastic dark matter. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 64(4). 531 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Arkani–Hamed, Nima, Lawrence J. Hall, David Smith, & Neal Weiner. (2001). Exponentially small supersymmetry breaking from extra dimensions. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 63(5). 37 indexed citations
12.
Hall, Lawrence J., Yasunori Nomura, & David Smith. (2001). Gauge-Higgs Unification in Higher Dimensions. Physical Review B. 639. 1 indexed citations
13.
Arkani–Hamed, Nima, Lawrence J. Hall, Yasunori Nomura, David Smith, & Neal Weiner. (2001). Finite radiative electroweak symmetry breaking from the bulk. Nuclear Physics B. 605(1-3). 81–115. 68 indexed citations
14.
Arkani–Hamed, Nima, Lawrence J. Hall, David Smith, & Neal Weiner. (2000). Solving the hierarchy problem with exponentially large dimensions. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 62(10). 47 indexed citations
15.
Arkani–Hamed, Nima, Lawrence J. Hall, David Smith, & Neal Weiner. (2000). Flavor at the TeV scale with extra dimensions. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 61(11). 41 indexed citations
16.
Hall, Lawrence J. & David Smith. (1999). Leading order textures for lepton mass matrices. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 59(11). 5 indexed citations
17.
Barbieri, Riccardo, Lawrence J. Hall, David Smith, Neal Weiner, & Алессандро Струмиа. (1998). Oscillations of solar and atmospheric neutrinos. Journal of High Energy Physics. 1998(12). 17–17. 138 indexed citations
18.
Smith, David & B. W. Downs. (1964). AverageΛ-Nucleon Interaction in the Hypertriton. Physical Review. 133(2B). B461–B465. 11 indexed citations
19.
Downs, B. W., et al.. (1963). Analysis of the Hypertriton in Terms of Hard-Core Potentials. Physical Review. 129(6). 2730–2738. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026