David Schumm

1.1k total citations
38 papers, 466 citations indexed

About

David Schumm is a scholar working on Information Systems, Management Information Systems and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, David Schumm has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 466 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Information Systems, 26 papers in Management Information Systems and 14 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in David Schumm's work include Business Process Modeling and Analysis (26 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (22 papers) and Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (9 papers). David Schumm is often cited by papers focused on Business Process Modeling and Analysis (26 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (22 papers) and Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (9 papers). David Schumm collaborates with scholars based in Germany and Austria. David Schumm's co-authors include Frank Leymann, Christoph Fehling, Alexander Nowak, Tobias Binz, Daniel Schleicher, Steve Strauch, Dimka Karastoyanova, Ivona Brandić, Schahram Dustdar and Oliver Kopp and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of the Association for Information Systems and Future Internet.

In The Last Decade

David Schumm

37 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Schumm Germany 15 368 206 165 122 38 38 466
Keith D. Swenson United States 9 307 0.8× 284 1.4× 127 0.8× 129 1.1× 36 0.9× 23 456
Per Närman Sweden 14 270 0.7× 361 1.8× 180 1.1× 73 0.6× 34 0.9× 31 545
Ken Laskey United States 5 340 0.9× 165 0.8× 160 1.0× 193 1.6× 13 0.3× 7 483
Samuil Angelov Netherlands 12 328 0.9× 268 1.3× 100 0.6× 201 1.6× 19 0.5× 26 468
Roman Vaculín United States 16 399 1.1× 298 1.4× 140 0.8× 280 2.3× 36 0.9× 40 592
Dirk Slama 3 407 1.1× 268 1.3× 181 1.1× 211 1.7× 20 0.5× 4 562
Danny Greefhorst Netherlands 7 246 0.7× 195 0.9× 90 0.5× 161 1.3× 21 0.6× 10 410
Francis G. McCabe United Kingdom 7 341 0.9× 161 0.8× 175 1.1× 250 2.0× 12 0.3× 11 545
Heather Kreger United States 6 282 0.8× 120 0.6× 180 1.1× 135 1.1× 27 0.7× 7 410
Justus Bogner Germany 13 353 1.0× 98 0.5× 255 1.5× 191 1.6× 38 1.0× 44 606

Countries citing papers authored by David Schumm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Schumm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Schumm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Schumm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Schumm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Schumm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Schumm. The network helps show where David Schumm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Schumm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Schumm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Schumm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Schumm. David Schumm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Barzen, Johanna, Frank Leymann, David Schumm, & Matthias Wieland. (2012). Ein Ansatz zur Unterstützung des Kostümmanagements im Film auf Basis einer Mustersprache. 251–266. 2 indexed citations
2.
Schumm, David, et al.. (2012). Business Process Automation for Costume Management in Film Making: An Insight into Processes, Roles, and Document Structures.. EMISA FORUM. 32. 26–47. 2 indexed citations
3.
Fehling, Christoph, et al.. (2012). Pattern-Based Development and Management of Cloud Applications. Future Internet. 4(1). 110–141. 24 indexed citations
4.
Wagner, Sebastian, Christoph Fehling, Dimka Karastoyanova, & David Schumm. (2012). State propagation-based monitoring of business transactions. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 47. 1–8. 3 indexed citations
5.
Kopp, Oliver, Dimka Karastoyanova, Frank Leymann, et al.. (2011). A Classification of BPEL Extensions. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations
6.
Schumm, David, Dimka Karastoyanova, Oliver Kopp, et al.. (2011). Process Fragment Libraries for Easier and Faster Development of Process-based Applications. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations
7.
Kopp, Oliver, Frank Leymann, David Schumm, & Tobias Unger. (2011). On BPMN Process Fragment Auto-Completion.. Fachbereich Informatik (University of Stuttgart). 58–64. 4 indexed citations
8.
Schumm, David, et al.. (2011). State Propagation for Business Process Monitoring on Different Levels of Abstraction. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 18. 5 indexed citations
9.
Schumm, David, et al.. (2011). A prototype for view-based monitoring of BPEL processes. OPUS Publication Server of the University of Stuttgart (University of Stuttgart). 4 indexed citations
10.
Kopp, Oliver, et al.. (2011). WS-BPEL extension for compliance fragments (BPEL4CFrags), Version 1.0. OPUS Publication Server of the University of Stuttgart (University of Stuttgart). 3 indexed citations
11.
Leymann, Frank, et al.. (2011). Business process change management based on process model synchronization of multiple abstraction levels. Fachbereich Informatik (University of Stuttgart). 9 indexed citations
12.
Schumm, David, Dimka Karastoyanova, Oliver Kopp, et al.. (2011). Process Fragment Libraries for Easier and Faster Development of Process-based Applications. 2. 39–55. 24 indexed citations
13.
Schumm, David, et al.. (2011). Synchronization of Adaptive Process Models Using Levels of Abstraction. Fachbereich Informatik (University of Stuttgart). 2. 174–183. 3 indexed citations
14.
Nowak, Alexander, Frank Leymann, Daniel Schleicher, David Schumm, & Sebastian Wagner. (2011). Green business process patterns. Fachbereich Informatik (University of Stuttgart). 1–10. 24 indexed citations
15.
Nowak, Alexander, Frank Leymann, & David Schumm. (2011). The Differences and Commonalities between Green and Conventional Business Process Management. Fachbereich Informatik (University of Stuttgart). 569–576. 21 indexed citations
16.
Schleicher, Daniel, et al.. (2011). An approach to combine data-related and control-flow-related compliance rules. Fachbereich Informatik (University of Stuttgart). 1–8. 5 indexed citations
17.
Schumm, David, et al.. (2010). Integrating Compliance into Business Processes.. 2125–2137. 4 indexed citations
18.
Schleicher, Daniel, et al.. (2010). Compliance scopes: Extending the BPMN 2.0 meta model to specify compliance requirements. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 1–8. 10 indexed citations
19.
Schumm, David, et al.. (2009). On Visualizing and Modelling BPEL with BPMN. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 80–87. 15 indexed citations
20.
Schumm, David. (2007). A Graphical Tool for Modeling BPEL 2.0 Processes. Fachbereich Informatik (University of Stuttgart).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026