David R. Stapells

4.6k total citations
69 papers, 3.5k citations indexed

About

David R. Stapells is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, David R. Stapells has authored 69 papers receiving a total of 3.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 64 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 36 papers in Sensory Systems and 18 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in David R. Stapells's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (56 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (36 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (23 papers). David R. Stapells is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (56 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (36 papers) and Neuroscience and Music Perception (23 papers). David R. Stapells collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Brazil. David R. Stapells's co-authors include Terence W. Picton, Anthony T. Herdman, Brett Martin, Diane Kurtzberg, Peggy Oates, Susan A. Small, Picton Tw, Scott Makeig, Róbert Galambos and Otávio Gomes Lins and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology.

In The Last Decade

David R. Stapells

69 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David R. Stapells Canada 31 3.1k 1.7k 672 438 353 69 3.5k
C. Elberling Denmark 36 3.0k 1.0× 1.8k 1.0× 880 1.3× 256 0.6× 257 0.7× 85 3.5k
Manuel Don United States 26 2.9k 0.9× 1.4k 0.8× 474 0.7× 537 1.2× 138 0.4× 41 3.2k
Walt Jesteadt United States 28 2.8k 0.9× 1.7k 1.0× 1.2k 1.8× 351 0.8× 215 0.6× 109 3.4k
Barbara Cone‐Wesson United States 33 2.3k 0.8× 2.2k 1.3× 353 0.5× 239 0.5× 504 1.4× 50 3.5k
Joseph W. Hall United States 35 3.4k 1.1× 1.6k 0.9× 1.9k 2.8× 471 1.1× 201 0.6× 230 4.2k
J. J. Zwislocki United States 32 2.7k 0.9× 1.5k 0.8× 716 1.1× 664 1.5× 354 1.0× 103 3.9k
Michael A. Akeroyd United Kingdom 33 3.8k 1.3× 1.3k 0.8× 1.6k 2.4× 861 2.0× 193 0.5× 131 4.4k
Susan J. Norton United States 28 2.0k 0.6× 1.9k 1.1× 635 0.9× 115 0.3× 467 1.3× 64 2.5k
A. R. D. Thornton United Kingdom 24 1.8k 0.6× 1.4k 0.8× 520 0.8× 150 0.3× 198 0.6× 98 2.3k
Blake S. Wilson United States 29 3.6k 1.2× 2.0k 1.2× 1.4k 2.1× 249 0.6× 275 0.8× 70 4.3k

Countries citing papers authored by David R. Stapells

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David R. Stapells's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David R. Stapells with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David R. Stapells more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David R. Stapells

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David R. Stapells. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David R. Stapells. The network helps show where David R. Stapells may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David R. Stapells

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David R. Stapells. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David R. Stapells based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David R. Stapells. David R. Stapells is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stapells, David R., et al.. (2013). Monotic Versus Dichotic Multiple-Stimulus Auditory Steady State Responses in Young Children. Ear and Hearing. 34(5). 680–682. 8 indexed citations
3.
Stapells, David R., et al.. (2010). Multiple-ASSR Thresholds in Infants and Young Children with Hearing Loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 21(8). 535–545. 28 indexed citations
4.
D’Angiulli, Amedeo, Anthony T. Herdman, David R. Stapells, & Clyde Hertzman. (2008). Children's event-related potentials of auditory selective attention vary with their socioeconomic status.. Neuropsychology. 22(3). 293–300. 142 indexed citations
5.
Stapells, David R., et al.. (2008). The Effect of Brief-Tone Stimulus Duration on the Brain Stem Auditory Steady-State Response. Ear and Hearing. 29(1). 121–133. 10 indexed citations
7.
Dimitrijevic, Andrew & David R. Stapells. (2006). Human electrophysiological examination of buildup of the precedence effect. Neuroreport. 17(11). 1133–1137. 10 indexed citations
8.
Herdman, Anthony T. & David R. Stapells. (2003). Auditory steady-state response thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing impairments: Umbrales de las respuestas auditivas de estado estable en adultos con hipoacusia sensorineural. International Journal of Audiology. 42(5). 237–248. 96 indexed citations
9.
Herdman, Anthony T., Otávio Gomes Lins, Patricia Van Roon, et al.. (2002). Intracerebral Sources of Human Auditory Steady-State Responses. Brain Topography. 15(2). 69–86. 314 indexed citations
10.
Herdman, Anthony T., Terence W. Picton, & David R. Stapells. (2002). Place specificity of multiple auditory steady-state responses. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 112(4). 1569–1582. 68 indexed citations
11.
Herdman, Anthony T. & David R. Stapells. (2001). Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects. Scandinavian Audiology. 30(1). 41–49. 106 indexed citations
12.
Martin, Brett, et al.. (1998). The Effects of Broadband Noise Masking on Cortical Event-Related Potentials to Speech Sounds /ba/ and /da/. Ear and Hearing. 19(3). 218–231. 122 indexed citations
13.
Stapells, David R. & Peggy Oates. (1997). Estimation of the Pure-Tone Audiogram by the Auditory Brainstem Response: A Review. Audiology and Neurotology. 2(5). 257–280. 128 indexed citations
14.
Klein, Susan K., Diane Kurtzberg, Judith A. Kreuzer, et al.. (1995). Electrophysiologic Manifestations of Impaired Temporal Lobe Auditory Processing in Verbal Auditory Agnosia. Brain and Language. 51(3). 383–405. 41 indexed citations
15.
Feghali, Joseph G., et al.. (1993). Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: clinical applications and technical considerations. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology. 25(1-3). 61–71. 7 indexed citations
16.
Foxe, John J. & David R. Stapells. (1993). Normal Infant and Adult Auditory Brainstem Responses to Bone-Conducted Tones. International Journal of Audiology. 32(2). 95–109. 46 indexed citations
17.
Oates, Peggy & David R. Stapells. (1992). Interaction of Click Intensity and Cochlear Hearing Loss on Auditory Brain Stem Response Wave V Latency. Ear and Hearing. 13(1). 28–34. 8 indexed citations
18.
Stapells, David R. & Diane Kurtzberg. (1991). Evoked Potential Assessment of Auditory System Integrity in Infants. Clinics in Perinatology. 18(3). 497–518. 35 indexed citations
19.
Stapells, David R., et al.. (1991). Maturation of the Contralaterally Recorded Auditory Brain Stem Response. Ear and Hearing. 12(3). 167–173. 13 indexed citations
20.
Tw, Picton, et al.. (1981). Auditory evoked potentials from the human cochlea and brainstem.. PubMed. 9. 1–41. 187 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026