Countries citing papers authored by David R. Frelinger
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David R. Frelinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David R. Frelinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David R. Frelinger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David R. Frelinger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David R. Frelinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David R. Frelinger. The network helps show where David R. Frelinger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David R. Frelinger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David R. Frelinger.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David R. Frelinger based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David R. Frelinger. David R. Frelinger is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Heginbotham, Eric, Michael Nixon, Forrest Morgan, et al.. (2015). The U.S.-China Military Scorecard.3 indexed citations
4.
Heginbotham, Eric, Michael Nixon, Forrest Morgan, et al.. (2015). Tallying the U.S.-China Military Scorecard: Relative Capabilities and the Evolving Balance of Power, 1996–2017.
5.
Heginbotham, Eric, Michael Nixon, Forrest Morgan, et al.. (2015). Chinese Threats to U.S. Surface Ships: An Assessment of Relative Capabilities, 1996–2017.1 indexed citations
6.
Eaton, Derek, David R. Frelinger, Victoria A. Greenfield, et al.. (2013). Overseas Basing of U.S. Military Forces. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 82(1). 76–106.2 indexed citations
7.
Eaton, Derek, et al.. (2013). Overseas Basing of U.S. Military Forces: An Assessment of Relative Costs and Strategic Benefits.31 indexed citations
8.
Jackson, Brian A., et al.. (2012). Efficient Aviation Security.8 indexed citations
Gompert, David C., John C. Gordon, Adam Grissom, et al.. (2008). War by Other Means -- Building Complete and Balanced Capabilities for Counterinsurgency. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).30 indexed citations
Libicki, Martin C., et al.. (2007). Byting back : regaining information superiority against 21st-century insurgents. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).8 indexed citations
Baker, John C., et al.. (2004). Mapping the risks : assessing the homeland security implications of publicly available geospatial information. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).18 indexed citations
15.
Vick, Alan J., et al.. (2002). Aerospace Operations in Urban Environments.3 indexed citations
16.
Libicki, Martin C., et al.. (2000). Scaffolding the New Web. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 4(2). 109–10.3 indexed citations
17.
Libicki, Martin C., et al.. (2000). Scaffolding the New Web: Standards and Standards Policy for the Digital Economy. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).13 indexed citations
18.
Frelinger, David R., et al.. (1995). Providing an Effective Bomber Force for the Future: The B-2 Debate in Perspective.
Aroesty, Jerry, et al.. (1993). The National Aerospace Plane (NASP): Development Issues for the Follow-on Vehicle: Executive Summary.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.