David Pugh

3.5k citations
102 papers · 2.9k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 28

David Pugh

100 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Hit Papers

Metal complexes with ‘pincer’-type ligands incorporating ...5712006202620122019100200300400500

Peers

David Pugh
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Organic Chemistry 1.7k
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 157
  • Inorganic Chemistry 622
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 519
  • Catalysis 180
Replace T. Kajiwara with:
T. Kajiwara Japan
Wolfgang Hieringer Germany
De‐Cai Fang China
Eduard Bernhardt Germany
Masa‐aki Haga Japan
David Schmidt Germany
A. R. Siedle United States
Karin Fink Germany
Derek Sutton Canada
R. J. Klingler United States
David Pugh relative to T. Kajiwara Japan T. Kajiwara's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
T. Kajiwara · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Pugh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Pugh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Pugh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Pugh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Pugh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Pugh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Pugh. The network helps show where David Pugh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Pugh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Pugh Line = papers co-authored together David Pugh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20252
2 20241
3 20247
4 20239
5 202211
6 20225
7 20209
8 20157
9 201516
10 201426
11 20146
12 20144
13 20133
14 201342
15 201217
16 200994
17 200884
18 200739
19 20062
20 200587

About David Pugh

David Pugh is a scholar working on Catalysis, Inorganic Chemistry, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Organic Chemistry and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 102 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include N-Heterocyclic Carbenes in Organic and Inorganic Chemistry (13 papers), Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (13 papers), Ionic liquids properties and applications (12 papers), Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (10 papers), Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (9 papers), Nonlinear Optical Materials Research (9 papers), Ga2O3 and related materials (8 papers) and Organometallic Compounds Synthesis and Characterization (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (1.7k citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (157 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (622 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (519 citations) and Catalysis (180 citations). David Pugh has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Andreas A. Danopoulos, John Morley, Ivan P. Parkin, Claire J. Carmalt, Joseph A. Wright, Gillian Reid, William Levason, Leanne G. Bloor, Christopher S. Blackman and Aimee L. Boyle. Their work appears in journals such as Dalton Transactions, Chemistry - A European Journal, Inorganic Chemistry, Chemical Science and New Journal of Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026