David Papadimos

448 total citations
11 papers, 205 citations indexed

About

David Papadimos is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oncology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, David Papadimos has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 205 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Molecular Biology, 4 papers in Oncology and 3 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in David Papadimos's work include Metastasis and carcinoma case studies (2 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Barrier Structure and Function Studies (1 paper). David Papadimos is often cited by papers focused on Metastasis and carcinoma case studies (2 papers), Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Barrier Structure and Function Studies (1 paper). David Papadimos collaborates with scholars based in Australia. David Papadimos's co-authors include Paul Shield, Michael D. Walsh, Peter G. Parsons, Penelope M. Webb, Glen M. Boyle, Melissa A. Merritt, A. Martyn, Adèle C. Green, Paul Kerlin and Owen Harris and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Pathology, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and BMC Cancer.

In The Last Decade

David Papadimos

11 papers receiving 201 citations

Peers

David Papadimos

ONCOL

PRM

MB

CR

SURGE

Akira Okimura Japan

Carole Massabeau France

Simone Zanotti Italy

Cunxian Zhang United States

C S Kang South Korea

Rachel E. Simpson United States

Geer Zhang China

Yutaro Mihara Japan

Dong‐Chun Hong China

Amparo Sáez Spain

Akira Okimura Japan

David Papadimos

141 ×1.6

ONCOL

82 ×1.2

PRM

112 ×1.8

MB

49 ×1.1

CR

67 ×1.7

SURGE

Citations per year, relative to David Papadimos David Papadimos (= 1×) peers Akira Okimura

Countries citing papers authored by David Papadimos

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Papadimos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Papadimos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Papadimos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Papadimos

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Papadimos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Papadimos. The network helps show where David Papadimos may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Papadimos

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Papadimos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Papadimos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Papadimos. David Papadimos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Walsh, Michael D., et al.. (2019). Claudin‐4 immunohistochemistry is a useful pan‐carcinoma marker for serous effusion specimens. Cytopathology. 30(6). 614–619. 20 indexed citations

2.

Hobson, Peter, et al.. (2019). Investigation of lymphoid lesions of the head and neck using combined fine needle aspiration cytology and flow cytometry: Accuracy and pitfalls. Cytopathology. 30(4). 370–377. 6 indexed citations

3.

Wisniowski, Brendan, Donald S.A. McLeod, Rebecca Adams, et al.. (2019). The epidemiology of amyloidosis in Australia. Amyloid. 26(sup1). 132–133. 5 indexed citations

4.

Reed, Amy E. McCart, Jamie R. Kutasovic, Ana Cristina Vargas, et al.. (2015). An epithelial to mesenchymal transition programme does not usually drive the phenotype of invasive lobular carcinomas. The Journal of Pathology. 238(4). 489–494. 30 indexed citations

5.

Shield, Paul, David Papadimos, & Michael D. Walsh. (2014). GATA3: A promising marker for metastatic breast carcinoma in serous effusion specimens. Cancer Cytopathology. 122(4). 307–312. 52 indexed citations

6.

Cummings, Margaret C., et al.. (2014). Which are more correctly diagnosed: Conventional Papanicolaou smears or Thinprep samples? A comparative study of 9 years of external quality‐assurance testing. Cancer Cytopathology. 123(2). 108–116. 10 indexed citations

7.

Cummings, Margaret C., Leonard Da Silva, David Papadimos, & Sunil R. Lakhani. (2009). Fibroadenoma and intraduct papilloma—a common pathogenesis?. Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin. 455(3). 271–275. 8 indexed citations

8.

Merritt, Melissa A., Peter G. Parsons, A. Martyn, et al.. (2009). Expression profiling identifies genes involved in neoplastic transformation of serous ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer. 9(1). 378–378. 41 indexed citations

9.

Papadimos, David. (2004). Cytology: Diagnostic Principles and Clinical Correlates: 2nd Edition. Pathology. 36(2). 214–214. 12 indexed citations

10.

Papadimos, David, et al.. (1997). A technique for the culture of Barrett's oesophageal cells. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 12(8). 606–611. 7 indexed citations

11.

Papadimos, David, Paul Kerlin, & Owen Harris. (1986). Endoscopic sclerotherapy: lessons from a necropsy study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 32(4). 269–273. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact