David Menger

471 total citations
8 papers, 297 citations indexed

About

David Menger is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Plant Science and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, David Menger has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 297 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 4 papers in Plant Science and 3 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in David Menger's work include Insect Pest Control Strategies (4 papers), Malaria Research and Control (4 papers) and Mosquito-borne diseases and control (4 papers). David Menger is often cited by papers focused on Insect Pest Control Strategies (4 papers), Malaria Research and Control (4 papers) and Mosquito-borne diseases and control (4 papers). David Menger collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Kenya and Portugal. David Menger's co-authors include Willem Takken, Joop J. A. van Loon, Wolfgang R Mukabana, Niels O. Verhulst, Marjolein de Rijk, Berhane T. Weldegergis, Bruno Otieno, Frans Jacobs, Renate C. Smallegange and Gabriella Bukovinszkine’Kiss and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Annals of Botany.

In The Last Decade

David Menger

8 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Menger Netherlands 8 191 127 97 59 24 8 297
Bruno Otieno Kenya 9 308 1.6× 170 1.3× 97 1.0× 52 0.9× 18 0.8× 12 380
Philemon Omusula Netherlands 10 301 1.6× 178 1.4× 92 0.9× 52 0.9× 8 0.3× 10 353
Nur Faeza Abu Kassim Malaysia 12 208 1.1× 87 0.7× 113 1.2× 11 0.2× 21 0.9× 36 315
Mahmood Reza Nıkbakhtzadeh Iran 12 67 0.4× 66 0.5× 134 1.4× 30 0.5× 54 2.3× 27 315
Kwang Shik Choi South Korea 12 297 1.6× 146 1.1× 56 0.6× 8 0.1× 121 5.0× 53 442
Chansak Suwanchaichinda United States 7 137 0.7× 68 0.5× 198 2.0× 99 1.7× 103 4.3× 11 401
Daniel A.H. Peach Canada 9 132 0.7× 119 0.9× 180 1.9× 42 0.7× 19 0.8× 25 305
M. J. Mendki India 11 185 1.0× 137 1.1× 118 1.2× 47 0.8× 51 2.1× 16 317
Doria F. Bowers United States 10 188 1.0× 48 0.4× 115 1.2× 16 0.3× 42 1.8× 17 272
Xinyue Gu Australia 10 97 0.5× 55 0.4× 214 2.2× 14 0.2× 64 2.7× 28 327

Countries citing papers authored by David Menger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Menger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Menger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Menger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Menger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Menger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Menger. The network helps show where David Menger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Menger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Menger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Menger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Menger. David Menger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Beladjal, Lynda, Lieve Van Landuyt, David Menger, et al.. (2019). Electrospinning repellents in polyvinyl alcohol-nanofibres for obtaining mosquito-repelling fabrics. Royal Society Open Science. 6(8). 182139–182139. 16 indexed citations
2.
Menger, David, Philemon Omusula, Ana Carreira, et al.. (2016). Eave Screening and Push-Pull Tactics to Reduce House Entry by Vectors of Malaria. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 94(4). 868–878. 25 indexed citations
3.
Verhulst, Niels O., Berhane T. Weldegergis, David Menger, & Willem Takken. (2016). Attractiveness of volatiles from different body parts to the malaria mosquito Anopheles coluzzii is affected by deodorant compounds. Scientific Reports. 6(1). 27141–27141. 41 indexed citations
4.
Loon, Joop J. A. van, Renate C. Smallegange, Gabriella Bukovinszkine’Kiss, et al.. (2015). Mosquito Attraction: Crucial Role of Carbon Dioxide in Formulation of a Five-Component Blend of Human-Derived Volatiles. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 41(6). 567–573. 53 indexed citations
5.
Menger, David, Philemon Omusula, Tobias Homan, et al.. (2015). Field Evaluation of a Push-Pull System to Reduce Malaria Transmission. PLoS ONE. 10(4). e0123415–e0123415. 33 indexed citations
6.
Menger, David, Bruno Otieno, Marjolein de Rijk, et al.. (2014). A push-pull system to reduce house entry of malaria mosquitoes. Malaria Journal. 13(1). 119–119. 41 indexed citations
7.
Menger, David, Joop J. A. van Loon, & Willem Takken. (2014). Assessing the efficacy of candidate mosquito repellents against the background of an attractive source that mimics a human host. Medical and Veterinary Entomology. 28(4). 407–413. 60 indexed citations
8.
Tolera, Motuma, David Menger, Ute Sass‐Klaassen, et al.. (2012). Resin secretory structures of Boswellia papyrifera and implications for frankincense yield. Annals of Botany. 111(1). 61–68. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026