David Mark

10.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
121 papers, 6.5k citations indexed

About

David Mark is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Signal Processing and Environmental Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, David Mark has authored 121 papers receiving a total of 6.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 58 papers in Geography, Planning and Development, 29 papers in Signal Processing and 19 papers in Environmental Engineering. Recurrent topics in David Mark's work include Geographic Information Systems Studies (58 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (29 papers) and Soil Geostatistics and Mapping (13 papers). David Mark is often cited by papers focused on Geographic Information Systems Studies (58 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (29 papers) and Soil Geostatistics and Mapping (13 papers). David Mark collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. David Mark's co-authors include John O'Callaghan, Barry Smith, Max J. Egenhofer, Michael F. Goodchild, Michael Church, Christian Freksa, Andrew U. Frank, Anthony G. Cohn, Ferenc Csillag and David J. Abel and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Water Resources Research.

In The Last Decade

David Mark

113 papers receiving 5.8k citations

Hit Papers

The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevatio... 1984 2026 1998 2012 1984 500 1000 1.5k 2.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Mark United States 35 1.9k 1.5k 1.3k 1.3k 1.1k 121 6.5k
P.A. Burrough Netherlands 39 1.5k 0.8× 2.6k 1.7× 1.4k 1.0× 3.4k 2.7× 1.8k 1.6× 87 10.5k
Philippe De Maeyer Belgium 47 1.4k 0.8× 4.2k 2.8× 599 0.5× 1.2k 0.9× 1.1k 0.9× 409 9.3k
John P. Wilson United States 36 1.2k 0.7× 1.8k 1.2× 306 0.2× 1.6k 1.3× 1.1k 1.0× 153 6.2k
Gilberto Câmara Brazil 34 414 0.2× 2.0k 1.3× 627 0.5× 645 0.5× 1.2k 1.1× 146 4.9k
A‐Xing Zhu China 59 1.7k 0.9× 4.2k 2.8× 469 0.4× 4.3k 3.3× 2.0k 1.7× 320 11.9k
Helena Mitášová United States 31 1.1k 0.6× 937 0.6× 232 0.2× 1.4k 1.1× 1.0k 0.9× 108 4.3k
Rachael McDonnell United Kingdom 17 768 0.4× 1.1k 0.7× 273 0.2× 1.0k 0.8× 606 0.5× 39 3.8k
Chenghu Zhou China 58 1.4k 0.8× 5.4k 3.6× 278 0.2× 3.4k 2.6× 1.9k 1.6× 424 12.8k
Huadong Guo China 51 571 0.3× 3.6k 2.4× 500 0.4× 2.1k 1.6× 1.6k 1.4× 570 10.4k
T. M. Lillesand United States 24 1.0k 0.5× 3.6k 2.5× 225 0.2× 2.7k 2.1× 4.4k 3.9× 41 10.2k

Countries citing papers authored by David Mark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Mark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Mark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Mark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Mark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Mark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Mark. The network helps show where David Mark may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Mark

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Mark. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Mark based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Mark. David Mark is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Feng, Chen‐Chieh & David Mark. (2017). Cross-Linguistic Research on Landscape Categories Using GEOnet Names Server Data: A Case Study for Indonesia and Malaysia. The Professional Geographer. 69(4). 567–578. 7 indexed citations
2.
Raubal, Martin, David Mark, & Andrew U. Frank. (2013). Cognitive and linguistic aspects of geographic space : new perspectives on geographic information research. Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)). 9 indexed citations
3.
Mark, David & Max J. Egenhofer. (2013). Modeling Spatial Relations Between Lines and Regions: Combining Formal Mathematical Models and Human Subjects Testing. 19 indexed citations
4.
Mark, David, et al.. (2011). Landscape in language. 1–24. 3 indexed citations
5.
Fabrikant, Sara Irina, Daniel R. Montello, & David Mark. (2009). The natural landscape metaphor in information visualization: The role of commonsense geomorphology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2). 253–270. 27 indexed citations
6.
Smith, Barry, David Mark, & Isaac Ehrlich. (2008). The mystery of capital and the construction of social reality. PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation). 33 indexed citations
7.
Fabrikant, Sara Irina, et al.. (2006). The distance-similarity metaphor in region-display spatializations. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 26(4). 34–44. 27 indexed citations
8.
Cohn, Anthony G. & David Mark. (2005). Spatial Information Theory: International Conference, COSIT 2005, Ellicottville, NY, USA, September 14-18, 2005, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science). 2 indexed citations
9.
Cohn, Anthony G. & David Mark. (2005). Spatial information theory : International Conference, COSIT 2005, Elliottville, NY, USA, September 14-18, 2005 : proceedings. Springer eBooks. 1 indexed citations
10.
Mark, David & Barry Smith. (2004). A science of topography: Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide. Frontiers in Plant Science. 6. 6–6. 10 indexed citations
11.
Mark, David, et al.. (2004). Ethnophysiography and the ontology of the landscape. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University). 4 indexed citations
13.
Wang, Wei, et al.. (2002). Webview: a distributed geographical image retrieval system. International Conference on Digital Government Research. 1–4. 1 indexed citations
15.
Shariff, Abdul Rashid Mohamed, Max J. Egenhofer, & David Mark. (1998). Natural-Language Spatial Relations Between Linear and Areal Objects: The Topology and Metric of English- Language Terms *. 12(1). 215–245. 92 indexed citations
16.
Gould, Michael, et al.. (1996). Formalizing informal geographic information: cross-cultural human subjects testing. 285–294. 1 indexed citations
17.
Rex, Douglas K., David Mark, Brian Clarke, John C. Lappas, & G A Lehman. (1995). Flexible sigmoidoscopy plus air-contrast barium enema versus colonoscopy for evaluation of symptomatic patients without evidence of bleeding. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 42(2). 132–138. 29 indexed citations
18.
Mark, David, et al.. (1987). Gestiones y perspectivas de desarrollo de sistemas de información geográfica. Estudios Geográficos. 48(188). 359–378.
19.
Mark, David & David J. Abel. (1985). Linear Quadtrees from Vector Representations of Polygons. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. PAMI-7(3). 344–349. 18 indexed citations
20.
Peucker, Thomas K., Robert J. Fowler, James J. Little, & David Mark. (1976). Digital Representation of Three-Dimensional Surfaces by Triangulated Irregular Networks (TIN). REVISED.. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026