David M. Mofford

479 total citations
9 papers, 369 citations indexed

About

David M. Mofford is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, David M. Mofford has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 369 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Molecular Biology, 8 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 3 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in David M. Mofford's work include bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (9 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (6 papers) and Biosensors and Analytical Detection (3 papers). David M. Mofford is often cited by papers focused on bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (9 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (6 papers) and Biosensors and Analytical Detection (3 papers). David M. Mofford collaborates with scholars based in United States. David M. Mofford's co-authors include Stephen C. Miller, G. Randheer Reddy, Spencer T. Adams and G. Sudhakar Reddy and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.

In The Last Decade

David M. Mofford

9 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
David M. Mofford United States	8	331	175	162	88	24	9	369
Zinaida M. Kaskova Russia	9	445 1.3×	163 0.9×	187 1.2×	60 0.7×	26 1.1×	22	528
Rui Fontes Portugal	13	433 1.3×	239 1.4×	100 0.6×	65 0.7×	24 1.0×	19	491
Tsutomu Irie Japan	4	361 1.1×	205 1.2×	136 0.8×	56 0.6×	20 0.8×	5	392
Natalia P. Malikova Russia	15	503 1.5×	394 2.3×	131 0.8×	60 0.7×	12 0.5×	23	528
Ryo Nishihara Japan	11	253 0.8×	91 0.5×	147 0.9×	53 0.6×	33 1.4×	26	305
Abhi Aggarwal United States	6	213 0.6×	101 0.6×	39 0.2×	94 1.1×	19 0.8×	10	324
Urszula Cendrowska Switzerland	8	263 0.8×	128 0.7×	29 0.2×	21 0.2×	34 1.4×	10	396
Louis-Philippe Picard Canada	10	268 0.8×	105 0.6×	37 0.2×	32 0.4×	14 0.6×	13	328
Colin M. Rathbun United States	11	371 1.1×	129 0.7×	137 0.8×	73 0.8×	33 1.4×	12	530
Joëlle Goulding United Kingdom	8	320 1.0×	134 0.8×	23 0.1×	26 0.3×	12 0.5×	18	380

Countries citing papers authored by David M. Mofford

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David M. Mofford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David M. Mofford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David M. Mofford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David M. Mofford

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David M. Mofford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David M. Mofford. The network helps show where David M. Mofford may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David M. Mofford

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David M. Mofford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David M. Mofford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David M. Mofford. David M. Mofford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Miller, Stephen C., David M. Mofford, & Spencer T. Adams. (2018). Lessons Learned from Luminous Luciferins and Latent Luciferases. ACS Chemical Biology. 13(7). 1734–1740. 22 indexed citations

2.

Mofford, David M., et al.. (2017). Luciferase Activity of Insect Fatty Acyl-CoA Synthetases with Synthetic Luciferins. ACS Chemical Biology. 12(12). 2946–2951. 11 indexed citations

3.

Adams, Spencer T., David M. Mofford, G. Sudhakar Reddy, & Stephen C. Miller. (2016). Firefly Luciferase Mutants Allow Substrate‐Selective Bioluminescence Imaging in the Mouse Brain. Angewandte Chemie. 128(16). 5027–5030. 5 indexed citations

4.

Adams, Spencer T., David M. Mofford, G. Sudhakar Reddy, & Stephen C. Miller. (2016). Firefly Luciferase Mutants Allow Substrate‐Selective Bioluminescence Imaging in the Mouse Brain. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 55(16). 4943–4946. 49 indexed citations

5.

Mofford, David M. & Stephen C. Miller. (2015). Luciferins Behave Like Drugs. ACS Chemical Neuroscience. 6(8). 1273–1275. 19 indexed citations

6.

Mofford, David M., Spencer T. Adams, G. Sudhakar Reddy, G. Randheer Reddy, & Stephen C. Miller. (2015). Luciferin Amides Enable in Vivo Bioluminescence Detection of Endogenous Fatty Acid Amide Hydrolase Activity. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 137(27). 8684–8687. 67 indexed citations

7.

Mofford, David M., G. Randheer Reddy, & Stephen C. Miller. (2014). Latent luciferase activity in the fruit fly revealed by a synthetic luciferin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111(12). 4443–4448. 30 indexed citations

8.

Mofford, David M., G. Randheer Reddy, & Stephen C. Miller. (2014). Aminoluciferins Extend Firefly Luciferase Bioluminescence into the Near-Infrared and Can Be Preferred Substrates over d-Luciferin. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 136(38). 13277–13282. 103 indexed citations

9.

Mofford, David M., et al.. (2011). Identification of Mutant Firefly Luciferases that Efficiently Utilize Aminoluciferins. Chemistry & Biology. 18(12). 1649–1657. 63 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact