David M. Love

15 total papers · 2.3k total citations
11 papers, 837 citations indexed

About

David M. Love is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, David M. Love has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 837 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 8 papers in Atmospheric Science and 7 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in David M. Love's work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (11 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (8 papers) and Forest ecology and management (5 papers). David M. Love is often cited by papers focused on Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (11 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (8 papers) and Forest ecology and management (5 papers). David M. Love collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Canada. David M. Love's co-authors include John S. Sperry, Yujie Wang, William R. L. Anderegg, Martín Venturas, D. S. Mackay, Maurizio Mencuccini, Daniel M. Johnson, Anita Frehner, Jean‐Christophe Domec and Assaad Mrad and has published in prestigious journals such as Water Resources Research, New Phytologist and Plant Cell & Environment.

In The Last Decade

David M. Love

10 papers receiving 829 citations

Hit Papers

What plant hydraulics can... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 2016 100 200 300

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
David M. Love 760 350 328 224 85 11 837
David Aguadé 662 0.9× 280 0.8× 391 1.2× 266 1.2× 61 0.7× 10 746
M. Goulden 754 1.0× 245 0.7× 249 0.8× 259 1.2× 128 1.5× 11 860
D. Y. Hollinger 671 0.9× 319 0.9× 343 1.0× 281 1.3× 42 0.5× 12 811
Martti Perämäki 762 1.0× 427 1.2× 345 1.1× 228 1.0× 95 1.1× 23 964
Markus Schmidt 522 0.7× 222 0.6× 289 0.9× 197 0.9× 72 0.8× 21 723
Yan‐Shih Lin 902 1.2× 597 1.7× 305 0.9× 175 0.8× 42 0.5× 14 1.0k
A. A. H. Khan 605 0.8× 205 0.6× 287 0.9× 247 1.1× 159 1.9× 11 851
G. Tirone 671 0.9× 240 0.7× 316 1.0× 121 0.5× 97 1.1× 7 850
M. R. Kurpius 769 1.0× 307 0.9× 548 1.7× 133 0.6× 86 1.0× 11 1.0k
Yakir Preisler 622 0.8× 186 0.5× 331 1.0× 312 1.4× 89 1.0× 25 812

Countries citing papers authored by David M. Love

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David M. Love's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David M. Love with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David M. Love more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David M. Love

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David M. Love. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David M. Love. The network helps show where David M. Love may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David M. Love

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David M. Love. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David M. Love based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David M. Love. David M. Love is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026