David L. Field

2.0k total citations
45 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

David L. Field is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, David L. Field has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 17 papers in Genetics and 13 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in David L. Field's work include Plant and animal studies (28 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (16 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (13 papers). David L. Field is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (28 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (16 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (13 papers). David L. Field collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Austria and Canada. David L. Field's co-authors include Melinda Pickup, Spencer C. H. Barrett, Andrew G. Young, David J. Ayre, Robert J. Whelan, Md Momtazur Rahman, Kamal Alameh, Sarah B. Yakimowski, Imran Khan and Kuaanan Techato and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and The Science of The Total Environment.

In The Last Decade

David L. Field

42 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David L. Field Australia 21 596 418 390 345 277 45 1.3k
Margaret R. Douglas United States 16 787 1.3× 652 1.6× 434 1.1× 99 0.3× 115 0.4× 20 2.1k
Jonathan Cornelius Costa Rica 18 275 0.5× 386 0.9× 247 0.6× 380 1.1× 210 0.8× 51 1.3k
David Bush Australia 17 185 0.3× 492 1.2× 328 0.8× 435 1.3× 189 0.7× 68 1.3k
Lindsey Norgrove Switzerland 19 296 0.5× 310 0.7× 185 0.5× 187 0.5× 69 0.2× 69 1.1k
Heidi Liere United States 18 366 0.6× 438 1.0× 162 0.4× 136 0.4× 43 0.2× 35 1.1k
Chris Harwood Australia 26 318 0.5× 644 1.5× 236 0.6× 864 2.5× 301 1.1× 76 2.0k
Nick Pasiecznik United Kingdom 11 187 0.3× 445 1.1× 62 0.2× 236 0.7× 68 0.2× 48 1.1k
Ivana Pajač Živković Croatia 13 293 0.5× 521 1.2× 116 0.3× 41 0.1× 143 0.5× 73 1.3k
Larry M. York United States 20 142 0.2× 2.0k 4.7× 137 0.4× 259 0.8× 174 0.6× 47 2.4k
William R. Graves United States 21 230 0.4× 901 2.2× 67 0.2× 285 0.8× 201 0.7× 149 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by David L. Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David L. Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David L. Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David L. Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David L. Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David L. Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David L. Field. The network helps show where David L. Field may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David L. Field

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David L. Field. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David L. Field based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David L. Field. David L. Field is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ellis, Thomas James, David L. Field, & Nick Barton. (2025). Joint Estimation of Paternity, Sibships and Pollen Dispersal in a Snapdragon Hybrid Zone. Molecular Ecology. 34(18). e70051–e70051. 1 indexed citations
3.
Kestel, Joshua H., Philip W. Bateman, David L. Field, et al.. (2024). Spatio-temporal variation in arthropod-plant interactions: A direct comparison of eDNA metabarcoding of tree crop flowers and digital video recordings. Ecological Indicators. 169. 112827–112827. 1 indexed citations
4.
Field, David L., Ovidiu Paun, Martha Rendón‐Anaya, et al.. (2023). Drivers of genomic landscapes of differentiation across a Populus divergence gradient. Molecular Ecology. 32(15). 4348–4361. 12 indexed citations
5.
Kestel, Joshua H., et al.. (2023). eDNA metabarcoding of avocado flowers: ‘Hass’ it got potential to survey arthropods in food production systems?. Molecular Ecology Resources. 23(7). 1540–1555. 9 indexed citations
6.
Khan, Tauseef, David L. Field, Victoria Chen, et al.. (2023). Combination of Multiple Low-Risk Lifestyle Behaviors and Incident Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Diabetes Care. 46(3). 643–656. 39 indexed citations
8.
Kestel, Joshua H., David L. Field, Philip W. Bateman, et al.. (2022). Applications of environmental DNA (eDNA) in agricultural systems: Current uses, limitations and future prospects. The Science of The Total Environment. 847. 157556–157556. 47 indexed citations
9.
Piotti, Andrea, Michele Carbognani, Eddie van Etten, et al.. (2021). Genetic and ecological consequences of recent habitat fragmentation in a narrow endemic plant species within an urban context. Biodiversity and Conservation. 30(12). 3457–3478. 11 indexed citations
10.
Karrenberg, Sophie, C. Alex Buerkle, David L. Field, & Vincent Savolainen. (2020). Dedication: Christian Lexer (1971–2019). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 375(1806). 20200232–20200232. 2 indexed citations
11.
Field, David L.. (2020). Data from: Hybrid zone barriers comparative data set. Australasian Journal of Paramedicine. 1 indexed citations
12.
Pickup, Melinda, et al.. (2019). Variation in sexual dimorphism in a wind‐pollinated plant: the influence of geographical context and life‐cycle dynamics. New Phytologist. 224(3). 1108–1120. 17 indexed citations
13.
Field, David L., et al.. (2018). Evolutionary Pathways for the Generation of New Self-Incompatibility Haplotypes in a Nonself-Recognition System. Genetics. 209(3). 861–883. 11 indexed citations
14.
Ringbauer, Harald, Alexander Kolesnikov, David L. Field, & Nick Barton. (2018). Estimating Barriers to Gene Flow from Distorted Isolation-by-Distance Patterns. Genetics. 208(3). 1231–1245. 23 indexed citations
15.
Bradley, Desmond, Ping Xu, Irina Mohorianu, et al.. (2017). Evolution of flower color pattern through selection on regulatory small RNAs. Science. 358(6365). 925–928. 50 indexed citations
16.
Mina, Daniel Santa, Darren Au, Jennifer Brunet, et al.. (2017). Effects of the Community-Based Wellspring Cancer Exercise Program on Functional and Psychosocial Outcomes in Cancer Survivors. Current Oncology. 24(5). 284–294. 33 indexed citations
17.
Ellis, Thomas James & David L. Field. (2016). Repeated gains in yellow and anthocyanin pigmentation in flower colour transitions in the Antirrhineae. Annals of Botany. 117(7). 1133–1140. 15 indexed citations
18.
Pickup, Melinda, et al.. (2015). The dynamics of resource allocation and costs of reproduction in a sexually dimorphic, wind‐pollinated dioecious plant. Plant Biology. 18(1). 98–103. 33 indexed citations
19.
Field, David L., Melinda Pickup, & Spencer C. H. Barrett. (2013). Ecological context and metapopulation dynamics affect sex-ratio variation among dioecious plant populations. Annals of Botany. 111(5). 917–923. 53 indexed citations
20.
Field, David L., Melinda Pickup, & Spencer C. H. Barrett. (2012). COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF SEX-RATIO VARIATION IN DIOECIOUS FLOWERING PLANTS. Evolution. 67(3). 661–672. 125 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026