Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by David Kitzmiller
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David Kitzmiller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Kitzmiller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Kitzmiller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Kitzmiller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Kitzmiller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Kitzmiller. The network helps show where David Kitzmiller may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Kitzmiller
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Kitzmiller.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Kitzmiller based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Kitzmiller. David Kitzmiller is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Feng, Xiangyu, A. Rafieeinasab, David Kitzmiller, et al.. (2019). Calibrating the National Water Model V2.1 over the Contiguous United States. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2019.2 indexed citations
3.
Kitzmiller, David, et al.. (2018). The Analysis of Record for Calibration: A High-Resolution Precipitation and Surface Weather Dataset for the United States. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2018.10 indexed citations
Kitzmiller, David. (2011). Development of a short-range probabilistic precipitation forecast algorithm based on radar and numerical prediction model input.1 indexed citations
Ding, Feng, et al.. (2005). Evaluation of the Range Correction Algorithm and Convective Stratiform Separation Algorithm for Improving Hydrological Modeling.1 indexed citations
14.
Seo, Dong Jun, et al.. (2005). The National Mosaic and multisensor QPE (NMQ) Project - Status and plans for a community testbed for high-resolution multisensor quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) over the United States.9 indexed citations
15.
Krajewski, Witold F., Grzegorz J. Ciach, Roger Fulton, & David Kitzmiller. (2004). Towards Operational Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Estimation Using NEXRAD. AGU Spring Meeting Abstracts. 2004.4 indexed citations
16.
Ding, Feng, Dong Jun Seo, & David Kitzmiller. (2004). Validation of range correction algorithm using real-time radar data from Sterling, VA. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. 3465–3470.3 indexed citations
17.
Kitzmiller, David. (2001). Short-range forecasts of rainfall amount from an extrapolative-statistical technique utilizing multiple remote sensor observations.3 indexed citations
18.
Kitzmiller, David. (1996). One-hour forecasts of radar-estimated rainfall by an extrapolative-statistical method.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.