David K. Kreamer

2.1k total citations
34 papers, 624 citations indexed

About

David K. Kreamer is a scholar working on Geochemistry and Petrology, Environmental Engineering and Water Science and Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, David K. Kreamer has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 624 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Geochemistry and Petrology, 10 papers in Environmental Engineering and 7 papers in Water Science and Technology. Recurrent topics in David K. Kreamer's work include Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (11 papers), Groundwater flow and contamination studies (9 papers) and Soil and Unsaturated Flow (4 papers). David K. Kreamer is often cited by papers focused on Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry (11 papers), Groundwater flow and contamination studies (9 papers) and Soil and Unsaturated Flow (4 papers). David K. Kreamer collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. David K. Kreamer's co-authors include Klaus J. Stetzenbach, Vernon F. Hodge, Karen H. Johannesson, Spencer M. Steinberg, Austin Long, Xiaoping Zhou, G. Thompson, Edwin P. Weeks, Abraham E. Springer and Benjamin W. Tobin and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Water Resources Research and Chemosphere.

In The Last Decade

David K. Kreamer

33 papers receiving 583 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David K. Kreamer United States 14 248 200 104 81 80 34 624
Michele Paternoster Italy 20 385 1.6× 216 1.1× 93 0.9× 69 0.9× 40 0.5× 48 910
R.L. Bassett United States 16 413 1.7× 254 1.3× 111 1.1× 51 0.6× 63 0.8× 31 763
Travis McLing United States 13 194 0.8× 384 1.9× 66 0.6× 36 0.4× 71 0.9× 44 735
James A. Kingsbury United States 14 200 0.8× 181 0.9× 139 1.3× 46 0.6× 32 0.4× 34 622
Matteo Lelli Italy 14 130 0.5× 152 0.8× 39 0.4× 92 1.1× 77 1.0× 41 617
Benjamin F. Turner United States 8 132 0.5× 82 0.4× 121 1.2× 108 1.3× 40 0.5× 12 561
D. Cinti Italy 17 169 0.7× 169 0.8× 37 0.4× 77 1.0× 88 1.1× 45 717
J.I Kim Germany 9 152 0.6× 125 0.6× 123 1.2× 85 1.0× 131 1.6× 10 724
Peter Birkle Mexico 15 307 1.2× 133 0.7× 104 1.0× 82 1.0× 68 0.8× 50 749
Noémie Janot France 17 243 1.0× 117 0.6× 73 0.7× 114 1.4× 115 1.4× 31 784

Countries citing papers authored by David K. Kreamer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David K. Kreamer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David K. Kreamer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David K. Kreamer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David K. Kreamer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David K. Kreamer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David K. Kreamer. The network helps show where David K. Kreamer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David K. Kreamer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David K. Kreamer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David K. Kreamer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David K. Kreamer. David K. Kreamer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bourke, Sarah A., Élise Devoie, Margaret Shanafield, et al.. (2025). Hydrogeology, European colonialism, local communities and First Peoples: moving beyond business as usual. Hydrogeology Journal. 1 indexed citations
2.
Petitta, Marco, et al.. (2023). Topical Collection: International Year of Groundwater—managing future societal and environmental challenges. Hydrogeology Journal. 31(1). 1–6. 8 indexed citations
3.
Lapworth, Dan, Thomas B. Boving, Paul Hynds, et al.. (2022). Groundwater quality: global challenges, emerging threats and novel approaches. Hydrogeology Journal. 31(1). 15–18. 21 indexed citations
4.
Martin, Peter, Natàlia Estrada, D. Smith, et al.. (2020). Radiological Identification of Near-Surface Mineralogical Deposits Using Low-Altitude Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Remote Sensing. 12(21). 3562–3562. 18 indexed citations
5.
Springer, Abraham E., et al.. (2020). Quantifying the base flow of the Colorado River: its importance in sustaining perennial flow in northern Arizona and southern Utah (USA). Hydrogeology Journal. 29(2). 723–736. 8 indexed citations
7.
Hart, Evan, et al.. (2018). Water circulation in karst systems: comparing physicochemical and environmental isotopic data interpretation. Environmental Earth Sciences. 77(11). 6 indexed citations
8.
Tobin, Benjamin W., Abraham E. Springer, David K. Kreamer, & Edward R. Schenk. (2017). Review: The distribution, flow, and quality of Grand Canyon Springs, Arizona (USA). Hydrogeology Journal. 26(3). 721–732. 28 indexed citations
9.
Kreamer, David K.. (2012). Water and International Security. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education. 149(1). 1–3. 3 indexed citations
10.
Kreamer, David K., et al.. (2009). Sub‐Saharan African Ground Water Protection—Building on International Experience. Ground Water. 48(2). 257–268. 8 indexed citations
11.
Luke, Barbara, et al.. (2008). Mechanical model of monofill-type landfill cover subjected to subsidence. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 2(1). 29–44.
12.
Kreamer, David K., et al.. (2000). Groundwater Movement and Water Chemistry at Bryce Canyon National Park. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 1 indexed citations
13.
Johannesson, Karen H., Klaus J. Stetzenbach, David K. Kreamer, & Vernon F. Hodge. (1996). Multivariate statistical analysis of arsenic and selenium concentrations in groundwaters from south-central Nevada and Death Valley, California. Journal of Hydrology. 178(1-4). 181–204. 20 indexed citations
14.
Kreamer, David K., et al.. (1996). Trace Element Geochemistry in Water from Selected Springs in Death Valley National Park, California. Ground Water. 34(1). 95–103. 38 indexed citations
15.
James, David E., et al.. (1996). Interference of Avian Guano in Analyses of Fuel-Contaminated Soils. Journal of Environmental Engineering. 122(1). 74–76. 2 indexed citations
16.
Kreamer, David K., et al.. (1994). Vapor Adsorption of Trichloroethylene on Quartz Sands of Varying Grain Size. Journal of Environmental Engineering. 120(2). 348–358. 7 indexed citations
17.
Kreamer, David K., et al.. (1994). Physical and Mathematical Modeling of Diesel Fuel Liquid and Vapor Movement in Porous Media. Ground Water. 32(4). 551–560. 11 indexed citations
18.
Stetzenbach, Klaus J., et al.. (1994). Testing the Limits of ICP‐MS: Determination of Trace Elements in Ground Water at the Part‐Per‐Trillion Level. Ground Water. 32(6). 976–985. 94 indexed citations
19.
Steinberg, Spencer M. & David K. Kreamer. (1993). Evaluation of the sorption of volatile organic compounds by unsaturated calcareous soil from Southern Nevada using inverse gas chromatography. Environmental Science & Technology. 27(5). 883–888. 26 indexed citations
20.
Kreamer, David K. & Klaus J. Stetzenbach. (1990). Development of a Standard, Pure‐Compound Base Gasoline Mixture for Use as a Reference in Field and Laboratory Experiments. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation. 10(2). 135–145. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026