David J. Muth

963 total citations
26 papers, 657 citations indexed

About

David J. Muth is a scholar working on Agronomy and Crop Science, Mechanics of Materials and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, David J. Muth has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 657 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science, 15 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 15 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in David J. Muth's work include Bioenergy crop production and management (17 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (15 papers) and Biofuel production and bioconversion (14 papers). David J. Muth is often cited by papers focused on Bioenergy crop production and management (17 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (15 papers) and Biofuel production and bioconversion (14 papers). David J. Muth collaborates with scholars based in United States. David J. Muth's co-authors include Kenneth M. Bryden, Douglas L. Karlen, Richard Nelson, Ian J. Bonner, Kara Cafferty, Jacob J. Jacobson, Wallace E. Tyner, E. J. Kladivko, J. M. Novak and Jane M. F. Johnson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Cleaner Production, Applied Energy and Journal of Environmental Quality.

In The Last Decade

David J. Muth

26 papers receiving 628 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David J. Muth United States 14 337 328 219 170 81 26 657
Basanta R. Dhungana United States 4 276 0.8× 254 0.8× 126 0.6× 67 0.4× 38 0.5× 7 524
A. G. Dailey United Kingdom 7 219 0.6× 182 0.6× 83 0.4× 49 0.3× 63 0.8× 16 452
Laurence Eaton United States 13 201 0.6× 274 0.8× 162 0.7× 34 0.2× 136 1.7× 23 579
Fabien Ferchaud France 16 400 1.2× 291 0.9× 68 0.3× 335 2.0× 88 1.1× 34 904
Jon Finch United Kingdom 8 249 0.7× 182 0.6× 68 0.3× 75 0.4× 42 0.5× 16 491
David T. Lightle United States 4 303 0.9× 216 0.7× 81 0.4× 263 1.5× 89 1.1× 6 563
E. Bonari Italy 17 730 2.2× 471 1.4× 254 1.2× 141 0.8× 78 1.0× 55 1.2k
Kendrick Killian United States 8 219 0.6× 349 1.1× 67 0.3× 325 1.9× 186 2.3× 8 826
Jon McCalmont United Kingdom 16 391 1.2× 336 1.0× 57 0.3× 98 0.6× 99 1.2× 38 789
Rocky Lemus United States 9 636 1.9× 490 1.5× 318 1.5× 163 1.0× 33 0.4× 33 895

Countries citing papers authored by David J. Muth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David J. Muth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David J. Muth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David J. Muth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David J. Muth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David J. Muth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David J. Muth. The network helps show where David J. Muth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David J. Muth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David J. Muth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David J. Muth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David J. Muth. David J. Muth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Karlen, Douglas L., William Salas, Charles W. Rice, et al.. (2020). Climate smart agriculture opportunities for mitigating soil greenhouse gas emissions across the U.S. Corn-Belt. Journal of Cleaner Production. 268. 122240–122240. 46 indexed citations
2.
Inman, Daniel, Matthew Langholtz, Laurence Eaton, et al.. (2018). Investigation of biochemical biorefinery sizing and environmental sustainability impacts for conventional bale system and advanced uniform biomass logistics designs. Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining. 12(2). 325–325. 1 indexed citations
3.
Bonner, Ian J., et al.. (2016). Development of integrated bioenergy production systems using precision conservation and multicriteria decision analysis techniques. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 71(3). 182–193. 13 indexed citations
4.
Bonner, Ian J., et al.. (2014). Modeled Impacts of Cover Crops and Vegetative Barriers on Corn Stover Availability and Soil Quality. BioEnergy Research. 7(2). 576–589. 39 indexed citations
5.
Muth, David J.. (2014). Profitability versus environmental performance: Are they competing?. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 69(6). 28 indexed citations
6.
Tyner, Wallace E., et al.. (2014). Synergies between cover crops and corn stover removal. Agricultural Systems. 130. 67–76. 39 indexed citations
7.
Muth, David J., Matthew Langholtz, Eric C. D. Tan, et al.. (2014). Investigation of thermochemical biorefinery sizing and environmental sustainability impacts for conventional supply system and distributed pre‐processing supply system designs. Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining. 8(4). 545–567. 36 indexed citations
8.
Karlen, D. L. & David J. Muth. (2013). Landscape Management for Sustainable Supplies of Bioenergy Feedstock and Enhanced Soil Quality. Agrociencia. 17(2). 121–130. 4 indexed citations
9.
Tyner, Wallace E., et al.. (2013). Environmental tradeoffs of stover removal and erosion in Indiana. Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining. 7(1). 78–88. 7 indexed citations
10.
Cafferty, Kara, David J. Muth, Jacob J. Jacobson, & Kenneth M. Bryden. (2013). Model Based Biomass System Design of Feedstock Supply Systems for Bioenergy Production. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 24 indexed citations
11.
Tan, Eric C. D., Daniel Inman, Matthew Langholtz, et al.. (2013). Investigation of biochemical biorefinery sizing and environmental sustainability impacts for conventional bale system and advanced uniform biomass logistics designs. Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining. 7(3). 282–302. 56 indexed citations
12.
Muth, David J., Jacob J. Jacobson, Kara Cafferty, & Robert B. Jeffers. (2013). Feedstock Pathways for Bio-Oil and Syngas Conversion Pathways. 1 indexed citations
13.
Muth, David J. & Kenneth M. Bryden. (2012). A Conceptual Evaluation of Sustainable Variable-Rate Agricultural Residue Removal. Journal of Environmental Quality. 41(6). 1796–1805. 12 indexed citations
14.
Muth, David J., et al.. (2012). Modeling Sustainable Agricultural Residue Removal at the Subfield Scale. Agronomy Journal. 104(4). 970–981. 35 indexed citations
16.
Tyner, Wallace E., et al.. (2012). Environmental Impacts of Stover Removal in the Corn Belt. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 1 indexed citations
17.
Muth, David J., Kenneth M. Bryden, & Richard Nelson. (2012). Sustainable agricultural residue removal for bioenergy: A spatially comprehensive US national assessment. Applied Energy. 102. 403–417. 84 indexed citations
18.
Muth, David J. & Kenneth M. Bryden. (2012). An integrated model for assessment of sustainable agricultural residue removal limits for bioenergy systems. Environmental Modelling & Software. 39. 50–69. 52 indexed citations
19.
Hess, J. Richard, Kevin Kenney, Christopher T. Wright, David J. Muth, & William A. Smith. (2012). Improving Biomass Logistics Cost Within Agronomic Sustainability Constraints and Biomass Quality Targets. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 2 indexed citations
20.
Wilhelm, W. W., J. Richard Hess, Douglas L. Karlen, et al.. (2010). REVIEW: Balancing limiting factors & economic drivers for sustainable Midwestern US agricultural residue feedstock supplies. Industrial Biotechnology. 6(5). 271–287. 85 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026