David J. Innes

3.2k total citations
71 papers, 2.4k citations indexed

About

David J. Innes is a scholar working on Genetics, Ecology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, David J. Innes has authored 71 papers receiving a total of 2.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Genetics, 22 papers in Ecology and 15 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in David J. Innes's work include Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (15 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (12 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (11 papers). David J. Innes is often cited by papers focused on Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (15 papers), Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics (12 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (11 papers). David J. Innes collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. David J. Innes's co-authors include Paul D. N. Hebert, R. J. Thompson, Jorge E. Toro, Luise Hermanutz, Anthony J. Zera, Geoffrey L. Winsor, Steven S. Schwartz, Richard K. Koehn, Judith G. Hall and Melania E. Cristescu and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecology, Evolution and Limnology and Oceanography.

In The Last Decade

David J. Innes

71 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David J. Innes Canada 32 864 818 553 530 509 71 2.4k
France Dufresne Canada 25 690 0.8× 1.0k 1.3× 286 0.5× 290 0.5× 231 0.5× 67 2.1k
Robert H. Robichaux United States 26 507 0.6× 337 0.4× 783 1.4× 823 1.6× 378 0.7× 44 2.0k
Sheldon I. Guttman United States 28 835 1.0× 729 0.9× 972 1.8× 627 1.2× 580 1.1× 117 2.8k
R. Andrew King United Kingdom 27 662 0.8× 1.2k 1.5× 1.1k 2.1× 590 1.1× 172 0.3× 57 2.8k
J. B. Mitton United States 21 1.5k 1.7× 771 0.9× 1.3k 2.3× 879 1.7× 368 0.7× 32 3.0k
Thomas D. Watts United States 13 276 0.3× 558 0.7× 315 0.6× 359 0.7× 149 0.3× 16 1.7k
T. J. Pandian India 31 1.2k 1.4× 871 1.1× 306 0.6× 210 0.4× 576 1.1× 155 3.2k
Theodore J. Abatzopoulos Greece 29 779 0.9× 1.1k 1.4× 284 0.5× 71 0.1× 229 0.4× 81 2.3k
Edmund D. Brodie United States 27 622 0.7× 620 0.8× 876 1.6× 97 0.2× 758 1.5× 73 2.4k
Ken Spitze United States 20 805 0.9× 637 0.8× 473 0.9× 119 0.2× 155 0.3× 33 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by David J. Innes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David J. Innes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David J. Innes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David J. Innes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David J. Innes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David J. Innes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David J. Innes. The network helps show where David J. Innes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David J. Innes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David J. Innes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David J. Innes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David J. Innes. David J. Innes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bally, I.S.E., Alan Chambers, Yuval Cohen, et al.. (2021). The ‘Tommy Atkins’ mango genome reveals candidate genes for fruit quality. BMC Plant Biology. 21(1). 108–108. 40 indexed citations
2.
Mace, Emma, David J. Innes, Colleen Hunt, et al.. (2018). The Sorghum QTL Atlas: a powerful tool for trait dissection, comparative genomics and crop improvement. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 132(3). 751–766. 97 indexed citations
3.
Kuhn, David N., I.S.E. Bally, Natalie Dillon, et al.. (2017). Genetic Map of Mango: A Tool for Mango Breeding. Frontiers in Plant Science. 8. 577–577. 53 indexed citations
4.
Innes, David J., et al.. (2015). Sequence diversity and differential expression of major phenylpropanoid-flavonoid biosynthetic genes among three mango varieties. BMC Genomics. 16(1). 561–561. 28 indexed citations
5.
Dietzgen, Ralf G., David J. Innes, & Nicolás Bejerman. (2015). Complete genome sequence and intracellular protein localization of Datura yellow vein nucleorhabdovirus. Virus Research. 205. 7–11. 21 indexed citations
6.
Mace, Emma, Shuaishuai Tai, David J. Innes, et al.. (2014). The plasticity of NBS resistance genes in sorghum is driven by multiple evolutionary processes. BMC Plant Biology. 14(1). 253–253. 1 indexed citations
7.
Innes, David J., et al.. (2014). A population of sexual Daphnia pulex resists invasion by asexual clones. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 281(1788). 20140564–20140564. 11 indexed citations
8.
Liu, Guangxu, David J. Innes, & Raymond J. Thompson. (2011). Quantitative analysis of sperm plane circular movement in the blue mussels Mytilus edulis, M. trossulus and their hybrids. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A Ecological Genetics and Physiology. 315A(5). 280–290. 34 indexed citations
9.
Crease, Teresa J., Robin Floyd, Melania E. Cristescu, & David J. Innes. (2011). Evolutionary factors affecting Lactate dehydrogenase A and B variation in the Daphnia pulexspecies complex. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 11(1). 212–212. 18 indexed citations
11.
Buckley, S., P. F. Foley, David J. Innes, et al.. (2006). GABAA receptor β isoform protein expression in human alcoholic brain: interaction with genotype. Neurochemistry International. 49(6). 557–567. 15 indexed citations
12.
Toro, Jorge E., Raymond J. Thompson, & David J. Innes. (2006). Fertilization success and early survival in pure and hybrid larvae of Mytilus edulis (Linnaeus, 1758) and M. trossulus (Gould, 1850) from laboratory crosses. Aquaculture Research. 37(16). 1703–1708. 13 indexed citations
13.
Tagg, Nikki, David J. Innes, & C. Patrick Doncaster. (2005). Outcomes of reciprocal invasions between genetically diverse and genetically uniform populations of Daphnia obtusa (Kurz). Oecologia. 143(4). 527–536. 22 indexed citations
14.
Toro, Jorge E., David J. Innes, & R. J. Thompson. (2003). Genetic variation among life-history stages of mussels in a Mytilus edulis?M . trossulus hybrid zone. Marine Biology. -1(1). 1–1. 50 indexed citations
15.
Comesaña, Ángel Sebastián, Jorge E. Toro, David J. Innes, & R. J. Thompson. (1999). A molecular approach to the ecology of a mussel ( Mytilus edulis - M. trossulus ) hybrid zone on the east coast of Newfoundland, Canada. Marine Biology. 133(2). 213–221. 75 indexed citations
16.
Hermanutz, Luise, David J. Innes, Andrew J. Denham, & Robert J. Whelan. (1998). Very Low Fruit : Flower Ratios in Grevillea (Proteaceae) are Independent of Breeding System. Australian Journal of Botany. 46(4). 465–478. 36 indexed citations
17.
Innes, David J.. (1997). Sexual reproduction of Daphnia pulex in a temporary habitat. Oecologia. 111(1). 53–60. 57 indexed citations
19.
Innes, David J., et al.. (1990). Large disparity in recombination fractions reported in Picea mariana for the Aat-1/Pgi-2 linkage group. Canadian Journal of Botany. 68(3). 518–520. 1 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Gerald R., et al.. (1983). Taxonomic Relationships of the Zuni Mountain Sucker, Catostomus discobolus yarrowi. Copeia. 1983(1). 37–37. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026