Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
QUILF: A pascal program to assess equilibria among FeMgMnTi oxides, pyroxenes, olivine, and quartz
1993624 citationsDavid J. Andersen, D. H. Lindsley et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by David J. Andersen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David J. Andersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David J. Andersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David J. Andersen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David J. Andersen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David J. Andersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David J. Andersen. The network helps show where David J. Andersen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David J. Andersen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David J. Andersen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David J. Andersen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David J. Andersen. David J. Andersen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Andersen, David J.. (2011). Pushing the limits of democracy. Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University).5 indexed citations
8.
Ditonto, Tessa, et al.. (2010). Intersectional Stereotypes: How Gender, Race, and Partisan Stereotypes Interact in Evaluations of Political Candidates. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Andersen, David J., et al.. (1995). Voice Information Response System for Business Permit Assistance.1 indexed citations
14.
Andersen, David J., Finley C. Bishop, & D. H. Lindsley. (1991). Internally consistent solution models for Fe-Mg-Mn-Ti oxides: Fe-Mg-Ti oxides and olivine. American Mineralogist. 76. 427–444.44 indexed citations
15.
Andersen, David J. & D. H. Lindsley. (1988). Internally consistent solution models for Fe-Mg-Mn-Ti oxides; Fe-Ti oxides. American Mineralogist. 73. 714–726.362 indexed citations
16.
Frost, Carol D., D. H. Lindsley, & David J. Andersen. (1988). Fe-Ti oxide-silicate equilibria; assemblages with fayalitic olivine. American Mineralogist. 73. 727–740.162 indexed citations
17.
Andersen, David J. & D. H. Lindsley. (1984). Application of a Two-Pyroxene Thermometer: Correlation of Apparent Temperature with AL2O3 in Augite. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 7–8.2 indexed citations
18.
Lindsley, D. H. & David J. Andersen. (1983). A two‐pyroxene thermometer. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 88(S02).380 indexed citations
Andersen, David J. & D. H. Lindsley. (1979). The olivine-ilmenite thermometer.. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference Proceedings. 1. 493–507.25 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.