David Hope

708 total citations
20 papers, 298 citations indexed

About

David Hope is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, David Hope has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 298 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 8 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in David Hope's work include Social Policy and Reform Studies (6 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (5 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (5 papers). David Hope is often cited by papers focused on Social Policy and Reform Studies (6 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (5 papers) and Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (5 papers). David Hope collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Netherlands. David Hope's co-authors include David Soskice, Torben Iversen, Nicola Lacey, Sebastian Diessner, Niccolò Durazzi, Hanna Kleider, Lukas Haffert and Marco Giani and has published in prestigious journals such as World Politics, Annual Review of Political Science and Journal of European Public Policy.

In The Last Decade

David Hope

13 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
David Hope United Kingdom	7	127	103	103	90	58	20	298
Cameron Ballard-Rosa United States	7	172 1.4×	105 1.0×	117 1.1×	76 0.8×	26 0.4×	13	334
Christopher Kollmeyer United Kingdom	9	103 0.8×	136 1.3×	91 0.9×	61 0.7×	58 1.0×	19	326
Sandy Brian Hager United Kingdom	12	67 0.5×	85 0.8×	81 0.8×	148 1.6×	93 1.6×	25	315
Josh Pacewicz United States	9	93 0.7×	146 1.4×	62 0.6×	95 1.1×	11 0.2×	15	297
Vicki L. Birchfield United States	9	274 2.2×	136 1.3×	91 0.9×	50 0.6×	22 0.4×	19	396
Evgenia Passari France	3	171 1.3×	158 1.5×	128 1.2×	160 1.8×	132 2.3×	4	434
Jerold Waltman United States	8	145 1.1×	125 1.2×	83 0.8×	21 0.2×	20 0.3×	17	287
David K. Jesuit United States	7	192 1.5×	166 1.6×	103 1.0×	32 0.4×	31 0.5×	21	314
Kimberly Phillips-Fein United States	3	78 0.6×	114 1.1×	39 0.4×	39 0.4×	14 0.2×	8	212
Chrysa Leventi United Kingdom	6	95 0.7×	89 0.9×	86 0.8×	49 0.5×	17 0.3×	14	249

Countries citing papers authored by David Hope

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Hope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Hope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Hope more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Hope

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Hope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Hope. The network helps show where David Hope may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Hope

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Hope. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Hope based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Hope. David Hope is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Diessner, Sebastian, et al.. (2025). The transition to the knowledge economy in advanced capitalist democracies: a new index for comparative research. Socio-Economic Review. 23(4). 2223–2252. 5 indexed citations

Diessner, Sebastian, et al.. (2025). Skill‐Biased Policy Change: Governing the Transition to the Knowledge Economy in Germany, Sweden and Britain. Regulation & Governance.

Diessner, Sebastian, Niccolò Durazzi, & David Hope. (2025). Embedding Skill Bias: Technology, Institutions, and Inequality in Wages and Benefits. Comparative Politics. 57(4). 459–482. 2 indexed citations

Haffert, Lukas, et al.. (2025). Taxes on top incomes and financialisation. Review of International Political Economy. 32(2). 485–511.

Hope, David, et al.. (2022). Why do (some) ordinary Americans support tax cuts for the rich? Evidence from a randomised survey experiment. European Journal of Political Economy. 78. 102349–102349. 3 indexed citations

Hope, David, et al.. (2021). The knowledge economy and taxes on the rich. Journal of European Public Policy. 29(5). 728–747. 12 indexed citations

Giani, Marco, et al.. (2021). Household education gaps and gender role attitudes. Political Science Research and Methods. 10(4). 823–830. 1 indexed citations

Hope, David, et al.. (2021). Why Do (Some) Ordinary Americans Support Tax Cuts for the Rich? Evidence From a Randomized Survey Experiment. SocArXiv (OSF Preprints).

Hope, David, et al.. (2021). Why Do (Some) Ordinary Americans Support Tax Cuts for the Rich? Evidence From a Randomized Survey Experiment. SSRN Electronic Journal.

10.

Diessner, Sebastian, Niccolò Durazzi, & David Hope. (2021). Skill-Biased Liberalization: Germany’s Transition to the Knowledge Economy. Politics & Society. 50(1). 117–155. 31 indexed citations

11.

Hope, David, et al.. (2021). The economic consequences of major tax cuts for the rich. Socio-Economic Review. 20(2). 539–559. 2 indexed citations

12.

Hope, David, Niccolò Durazzi, & Sebastian Diessner. (2020). Reshaping skills, industrial relations and social protection for the knowledge economy : evidence from Germany.

13.

Hope, David, et al.. (2019). The transition to the knowledge economy, labor market institutions, and income inequality in advanced democracies. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 1 indexed citations

14.

Hope, David, et al.. (2019). The Transition to the Knowledge Economy, Labor Market Institutions, and Income Inequality in Advanced Democracies. World Politics. 71(2). 236–288. 39 indexed citations

15.

Hope, David. (2018). Making the best of arbitration*. Asia Pacific Law Review. 26(1). 1–13.

16.

Lacey, Nicola, David Soskice, & David Hope. (2017). Understanding the Determinants of Penal Policy: Crime, Culture, and Comparative Political Economy. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 1(1). 195–217. 52 indexed citations

17.

Hope, David & David Soskice. (2016). Growth Models, Varieties of Capitalism, and Macroeconomics. Politics & Society. 44(2). 209–226. 51 indexed citations

18.

Hope, David. (2016). Estimating the effect of the EMU on current account balances: A synthetic control approach. European Journal of Political Economy. 44. 20–40. 30 indexed citations

19.

Iversen, Torben, David Soskice, & David Hope. (2016). The Eurozone and Political Economic Institutions. Annual Review of Political Science. 19(1). 163–185. 66 indexed citations

20.

Hope, David. (1997). ‘The Letter Killeth, But The Spirit Giveth Life’ (2 Cor 3:6). Ecclesiastical Law Journal. 4(21). 694–699. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact