Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Inhibition of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Reduces Glycemia, Sustains Insulin Levels, and Reduces Glucagon Levels in Type 2 Diabetes
2004607 citationsBo Åhrén, Mona Landin‐Olsson et al.The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolismprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of David Holmes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Holmes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Holmes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Holmes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Holmes. The network helps show where David Holmes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Holmes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Holmes.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Holmes based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Holmes. David Holmes is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Beitzel, Steven M., Eric C. Jensen, Abdur Chowdhury, et al.. (2001). IIT at TREC-10.. Text REtrieval Conference.20 indexed citations
12.
Chowdhury, Abdur, Steven M. Beitzel, Eric C. Jensen, et al.. (2000). IIT TREC-9 - Entity Based Feedback with Fusion.. Text REtrieval Conference.6 indexed citations
13.
McCabe, M. Catherine, David Holmes, David A. Grossman, & Ophir Frieder. (2000). Parallel, Platform-Independent Implementation of Information Retrieval Algorithms.. Parallel and Distributed Processing Techniques and Applications.3 indexed citations
14.
McCabe, M. Catherine, et al.. (1999). IIT at TREC-8: Improving Baseline Precision.. Text REtrieval Conference. 48(7). 416–30.1 indexed citations
15.
Holmes, David, David A. Grossman, Ophir Frieder, M. Catherine McCabe, & Abdur Chowdhury. (1998). Use of Query Concepts and Information Extraction to Improve Information Retrieval Effectiveness.. Text REtrieval Conference. 341–350.3 indexed citations
16.
Holmes, David, et al.. (1997). Expanding Relevance Feedback in the Relational Model.. Text REtrieval Conference. 489–502.4 indexed citations
17.
Grossman, David A., et al.. (1996). Using Relevance Feedback within the Relational Model for TREC-5.. Text REtrieval Conference. 405–414.11 indexed citations
Grossman, David A., David Holmes, & Ophir Frieder. (1994). A Parallel DBMS Approach to IR in TREC-3.. Text REtrieval Conference. 279–288.10 indexed citations
20.
Holmes, David. (1983). Persistence in Student Affairs Work: Attitudes and Job Shifts Among Master's Program Graduates.. Journal of College Student Personnel. 24(5).19 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.