David H. Overstreet
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 0.1%
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 0.05%
- Molecular Biology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Physiology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Amir H. RezvaniDarin J. KnappGeorge R. BreeseDavid S. JanowskyGal YadidRoger W. RussellAbraham ZangenOlgierd Puciłowski
- Topics
- Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (127 papers)Stress Responses and Cortisol (74 papers)Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (61 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaIsrael
In The Last Decade
David H. Overstreet
253 papers receiving 11.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 6.4k
- Behavioral Neuroscience 3.5k
- Molecular Biology 3.2k
- Social Psychology 2.0k
- Physiology 1.6k
Countries citing papers authored by David H. Overstreet
This map shows the geographic impact of David H. Overstreet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David H. Overstreet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David H. Overstreet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David H. Overstreet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David H. Overstreet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David H. Overstreet. The network helps show where David H. Overstreet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David H. Overstreet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David H. Overstreet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David H. Overstreet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David H. Overstreet. David H. Overstreet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 33 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 302 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 66 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 64 | |
| 12 | 64 | |
| 13 | 42 | |
| 14 | 41 | |
| 15 | 129 | |
| 16 | 40 | |
| 17 | 101 | |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About David H. Overstreet
David H. Overstreet is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 260 papers that have together received 11.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (127 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (74 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (61 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (3.5k citations), Biological Psychiatry (1.5k citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (6.4k citations). David H. Overstreet has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Amir H. Rezvani, Darin J. Knapp, George R. Breese, David S. Janowsky, Gal Yadid, Roger W. Russell, Abraham Zangen, Olgierd Puciłowski, Gregers Wegener and Alexey B. Kampov‐Polevoy. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Brain Research and Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.