David H. Gleaves
- Clinical Psychology top 0.2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Pharmacy top 0.2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Antonio Cepeda‐BenitoDonald A. WilliamsonKathleen P. EberenzTara L. WilliamsAmanda D. HutchinsonCortney S. WarrenStephen A. ErathJennifer J. Freyd
- Topics
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors (78 papers)Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (28 papers)Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (26 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
David H. Gleaves
124 papers receiving 5.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Clinical Psychology 4.5k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.1k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 892
- Pharmacy 742
- Social Psychology 691
Countries citing papers authored by David H. Gleaves
This map shows the geographic impact of David H. Gleaves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David H. Gleaves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David H. Gleaves more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David H. Gleaves
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David H. Gleaves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David H. Gleaves. The network helps show where David H. Gleaves may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David H. Gleaves
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David H. Gleaves. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David H. Gleaves based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David H. Gleaves. David H. Gleaves is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Examining the Relationship between Mental Health, Creative Thought, and Optimism | 6 |
| 3 | 48 | |
| 4 | New Zealand Female Body Image: What Roles do Ethnicity and Body Mass Play? | 10 |
| 5 | 60 | |
| 6 | 38 | |
| 7 | 99 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 103 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 32 | |
| 13 | 235 | |
| 14 | 141 | |
| 15 | 39 | |
| 16 | 94 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 131 | |
| 19 | 47 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About David H. Gleaves
David H. Gleaves is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pharmacy and Applied Psychology, having authored 126 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (78 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (28 papers) and Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (26 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (4.5k citations), Pharmacy (742 citations) and Applied Psychology (376 citations). David H. Gleaves has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Antonio Cepeda‐Benito, Donald A. Williamson, Kathleen P. Eberenz, Tara L. Williams, Amanda D. Hutchinson, Cortney S. Warren, Stephen A. Erath, Jennifer J. Freyd, Bradley A. Green and M. Carmen Fernández‐Santaella. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Applied Psychology and American Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.