David H. Gire

1.8k total citations
25 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

David H. Gire is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, David H. Gire has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 15 papers in Sensory Systems and 7 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in David H. Gire's work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (15 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (12 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (6 papers). David H. Gire is often cited by papers focused on Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (15 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (12 papers) and Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (6 papers). David H. Gire collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and China. David H. Gire's co-authors include Nathan E. Schoppa, Diego Restrepo, Venkatesh N. Murthy, Jennifer D. Whitesell, Dan Rokni, Foivos Markopoulos, Wilder T. Doucette, Anan Li, Mary T. Lucero and Matthew C. Smear and has published in prestigious journals such as Neuron, Journal of Neuroscience and Nature Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

David H. Gire

24 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David H. Gire United States 14 841 775 334 294 276 25 1.2k
Max L. Fletcher United States 17 744 0.9× 551 0.7× 356 1.1× 238 0.8× 233 0.8× 27 936
John P. McGann United States 20 824 1.0× 825 1.1× 454 1.4× 321 1.1× 252 0.9× 27 1.3k
Matthew C. Smear United States 16 577 0.7× 1.0k 1.3× 156 0.5× 629 2.1× 278 1.0× 18 1.9k
Hartwig Spors Germany 11 886 1.1× 1.1k 1.5× 326 1.0× 532 1.8× 379 1.4× 18 1.5k
Vikrant Kapoor United States 12 556 0.7× 586 0.8× 247 0.7× 187 0.6× 168 0.6× 13 1.1k
Brice Bathellier France 19 554 0.7× 755 1.0× 244 0.7× 711 2.4× 230 0.8× 39 1.3k
Reiko Kobayakawa Japan 14 1.1k 1.3× 989 1.3× 633 1.9× 231 0.8× 235 0.9× 20 1.6k
Jennifer Beshel United States 10 454 0.5× 527 0.7× 128 0.4× 334 1.1× 182 0.7× 10 811
Cindy Poo United States 7 709 0.8× 712 0.9× 284 0.9× 355 1.2× 261 0.9× 7 966
Dong‐Jing Zou United States 18 758 0.9× 979 1.3× 531 1.6× 115 0.4× 203 0.7× 24 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by David H. Gire

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David H. Gire's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David H. Gire with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David H. Gire more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David H. Gire

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David H. Gire. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David H. Gire. The network helps show where David H. Gire may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David H. Gire

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David H. Gire. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David H. Gire based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David H. Gire. David H. Gire is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Smith, Joshua R., et al.. (2023). Mechanisms of octopus arm search behavior without visual feedback. Bioinspiration & Biomimetics. 18(6). 66017–66017. 2 indexed citations
2.
Smith, Joshua R., et al.. (2022). Lessons for Robotics From the Control Architecture of the Octopus. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 9. 862391–862391. 7 indexed citations
3.
Miller, Cory T., David H. Gire, Kim L. Hoke, et al.. (2022). Natural behavior is the language of the brain. Current Biology. 32(10). R482–R493. 74 indexed citations
4.
Gire, David H., et al.. (2021). The Lesser Pacific Striped Octopus, Octopus chierchiae: An Emerging Laboratory Model. Frontiers in Marine Science. 8. 8 indexed citations
5.
Lewis, M. E. Suzanne, et al.. (2021). Plume Dynamics Structure the Spatiotemporal Activity of Mitral/Tufted Cell Networks in the Mouse Olfactory Bulb. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 15. 633757–633757. 8 indexed citations
6.
Wang, Ziheng, et al.. (2021). A Machine Learning Approach for Detecting Vicarious Trial and Error Behaviors. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 15. 676779–676779. 1 indexed citations
7.
Baker, Phillip M., et al.. (2021). A selective role for the mPFC during choice and deliberation, but not spatial memory retention over short delays. Hippocampus. 31(7). 690–700. 10 indexed citations
9.
Gire, David H., et al.. (2020). Many Paths to the Same Goal: Balancing Exploration and Exploitation during Probabilistic Route Planning. eNeuro. 7(3). ENEURO.0536–19.2020. 14 indexed citations
10.
Gire, David H., Joseph D. Zak, Jennifer N. Bourne, Noah Goodson, & Nathan E. Schoppa. (2019). Balancing Extrasynaptic Excitation and Synaptic Inhibition within Olfactory Bulb Glomeruli. eNeuro. 6(4). ENEURO.0247–19.2019. 10 indexed citations
11.
Baker, Keeley L., Michael H. Dickinson, David H. Gire, et al.. (2018). Algorithms for Olfactory Search across Species. Journal of Neuroscience. 38(44). 9383–9389. 101 indexed citations
12.
Gire, David H., Vikrant Kapoor, Annie E. Arrighi‐Allisan, Agnese Seminara, & Venkatesh N. Murthy. (2016). Mice Develop Efficient Strategies for Foraging and Navigation Using Complex Natural Stimuli. Current Biology. 26(10). 1261–1273. 72 indexed citations
13.
Li, Anan, David H. Gire, & Diego Restrepo. (2015). ϒ Spike-Field Coherence in a Population of Olfactory Bulb Neurons Differentiates between Odors Irrespective of Associated Outcome. Journal of Neuroscience. 35(14). 5808–5822. 44 indexed citations
14.
Li, Anan, David H. Gire, Thomas Bozza, & Diego Restrepo. (2014). Precise Detection of Direct Glomerular Input Duration by the Olfactory Bulb. Journal of Neuroscience. 34(48). 16058–16064. 47 indexed citations
15.
Gire, David H., Diego Restrepo, Terrence J. Sejnowski, et al.. (2013). Temporal Processing in the Olfactory System: Can We See a Smell?. Neuron. 78(3). 416–432. 73 indexed citations
16.
Gire, David H., Jennifer D. Whitesell, Wilder T. Doucette, & Diego Restrepo. (2013). Information for decision-making and stimulus identification is multiplexed in sensory cortex. Nature Neuroscience. 16(8). 991–993. 63 indexed citations
17.
Gire, David H., Kevin M. Franks, Joseph D. Zak, et al.. (2012). Mitral Cells in the Olfactory Bulb Are Mainly Excited through a Multistep Signaling Path. Journal of Neuroscience. 32(9). 2964–2975. 131 indexed citations
18.
Doucette, Wilder T., et al.. (2011). Associative Cortex Features in the First Olfactory Brain Relay Station. Neuron. 69(6). 1176–1187. 125 indexed citations
19.
Gire, David H. & Nathan E. Schoppa. (2009). Control of On/Off Glomerular Signaling by a Local GABAergic Microcircuit in the Olfactory Bulb. Journal of Neuroscience. 29(43). 13454–13464. 120 indexed citations
20.
Gire, David H. & Nathan E. Schoppa. (2008). Long-Term Enhancement of Synchronized Oscillations by Adrenergic Receptor Activation in the Olfactory Bulb. Journal of Neurophysiology. 99(4). 2021–2025. 54 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026