Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Immunological Memory and Protective Immunity: Understanding Their Relation
This map shows the geographic impact of David Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Gray more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Gray. The network helps show where David Gray may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Gray
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Gray.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Gray based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Gray. David Gray is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gray, David. (2015). Fourth Amendment Remedies as Rights: The Warrant Requirement. Boston University law review. 96(2). 425.2 indexed citations
3.
Gray, David. (2015). A Collective Right to Be Secure from Unreasonable Tracking. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
4.
Gray, David. (2014). The ABA Standards for Criminal Justice: Law Enforcement Access to Third Party Records: Critical Perspectives from a Technology-Centered Approach to Quantitative Privacy. University of Oklahoma College of Law - Digital Commons (University of Oklahoma). 66(4). 919.1 indexed citations
Gray, David & Danielle Keats Citron. (2013). A Shattered Looking Glass: The Pitfalls and Potential of the Mosaic Theory of Fourth Amendment Privacy. eYLS (Yale Law School). 14(2). 381–430.3 indexed citations
7.
Gray, David, et al.. (2013). Fighting Cyber-Crime After United States v. Jones. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-). 103(3). 745–802.2 indexed citations
8.
Gray, David. (2012). A Spectacular Non Sequitur: The Supreme Court's Contemporary Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule Jurisprudence. SSRN Electronic Journal. 50(1). 29.1 indexed citations
9.
Gray, David, et al.. (2012). The Supreme Court's Contemporary Silver Platter Doctrine. Texas law review. 91(1). 7.
Gray, David. (2009). A No-Excuse Approach to Transitional Justice: Reparations As Tools of Extraordinary Justice. Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis). 87(5). 1043–1103.4 indexed citations
Barr, Tom A., Simon Brown, & David Gray. (2008). Innate responses of B cells. Immunology. 125. 19–20.1 indexed citations
16.
Gray, David. (2007). Devilry, Complicity, and Greed: Transitional Justice and Odious Debt. Law and Contemporary Problems. 70(3). 137–164.2 indexed citations
Oldfield, S., et al.. (1985). Class and subclass anti-pneumococcal antibody responses in splenectomized patients.. PubMed Central. 61(3). 664–73.32 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.