Citations per year, relative to David Gibson David Gibson (= 1×)
peers
Gary William Flake
Countries citing papers authored by David Gibson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David Gibson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Gibson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Gibson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Gibson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Gibson. The network helps show where David Gibson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Gibson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Gibson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Gibson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Gibson. David Gibson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gibson, David, Ravi Kumar, & Andrew Tomkins. (2005). Discovering large dense subgraphs in massive graphs. Very Large Data Bases. 721–732.202 indexed citations
2.
Gibson, David. (2005). Network-Based Learning and Assessment Applications on the Semantic Web. NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University). 1(4). 4.2 indexed citations
3.
Sherry, Lorraine, et al.. (2004). Responsive dissemination: A model for scaling and sustaining educational innovations. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2004(1). 3671–3676.1 indexed citations
4.
Conceição, Simone C. O., Lorraine Sherry, & David Gibson. (2004). Using Developmental Research to Design, Develop, and Evaluate an Urban Education Portal. The Journal of Interactive Learning Research. 15(3). 271–286.6 indexed citations
5.
Gibson, David, et al.. (2004). Bridging the distance between research and practice: Creating a community of practice for piloting an educational simulation.. E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. 2004(1). 1044–1057.
6.
Gibson, David. (2004). E-Portfolio Decisions and Dilemmas. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2004(1). 92–99.15 indexed citations
Gibson, David, et al.. (2004). Simulation as a Framework for Preservice Assessment. 2004(1). 3322–3325.3 indexed citations
9.
Gibson, David. (2003). Analysing Reputation in Web Communities.. International Conference on Internet Computing. 10–16.3 indexed citations
10.
Conceição, Simone C. O., et al.. (2003). Managing Digital Resources for an Urban Education Portal. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2003(1). 1104–1107.2 indexed citations
11.
Gibson, David, et al.. (2003). The Personal Learning Planner: Collaboration through Online Learning and Publication. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2003(1). 3590–3597.1 indexed citations
12.
Sørensen, Carsten, et al.. (2003). Modern professionals and their tools: ICT supporting organisational flexibility and control. European Conference on Information Systems. 12–21.5 indexed citations
13.
Gibson, David & Helen Barrett. (2002). Directions in Electronic Portfolio Development. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2(1). 556–573.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.