Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The dose–effect relationship in psychotherapy.
1986921 citationsKenneth I. Howard, David E. Orlinsky et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by David E. Orlinsky
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David E. Orlinsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David E. Orlinsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David E. Orlinsky more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David E. Orlinsky
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David E. Orlinsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David E. Orlinsky. The network helps show where David E. Orlinsky may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David E. Orlinsky
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David E. Orlinsky.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David E. Orlinsky based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David E. Orlinsky. David E. Orlinsky is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Orlinsky, David E.. (2012). The Psychotherapeutic Relationship, Personal Life, and Modern Culture.1 indexed citations
7.
Kazantzis, Nikolaos, et al.. (2010). Professional development perceptions and activities of psychiatrists and mental health nurses in New Zealand.. PubMed. 123(1317). 24–34.5 indexed citations
8.
Orlinsky, David E.. (2008). Die nächsten 10 Jahre Psychotherapieforschung. PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie. 58(09/10). 345–354.13 indexed citations
Orlinsky, David E., et al.. (2003). The Professional and Practice Characteristics of Korean Psychotherapists: Based on the “International Study of Development of Psychotherapists(ISDP)”. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF COUNSELING AND PSYCHOTHERAPY. 15(3). 423–439.2 indexed citations
13.
Gabalda, Isabel Caro, et al.. (2002). Percepción del desarrollo profesional del psicoterapeuta en España. Revista internacional de psicología y terapia psicológica. 2(2). 199–218.1 indexed citations
14.
Cierpka, Manfred, et al.. (1997). Studien ber Psychotherapeutinnen und Psychotherapeuten Wer sind wir? Wo arbeiten wir? Wie helfen wir?. Psychotherapeut. 5(42). 269–281.4 indexed citations
15.
Orlinsky, David E., et al.. (1996). [Quality of the therapeutic relationship: do common factors in psychotherapy correspond with common characteristics of psychotherapists? SPR Collaborative Research Network].. PubMed. 46(3-4). 102–10.9 indexed citations
16.
Orlinsky, David E., et al.. (1995). [Development of the theoretical orientation of psychotherapists. SPR Collaborative Research Network].. PubMed. 45(3-4). 109–20.13 indexed citations
Orlinsky, David E.. (1967). The Good Therapy Hour. Archives of General Psychiatry. 16(5). 621–621.61 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.