Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Convolutional Neural Networks for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment
2014836 citationsPeng Ye, David Doermann et al.profile →
Text Detection and Recognition in Imagery: A Survey
2014516 citationsQixiang Ye, David Doermannprofile →
Towards Optimal Structured CNN Pruning via Generative Adversarial Learning
2019358 citationsBaochang Zhang, Qixiang Ye et al.profile →
Blind Image Quality Assessment Based on High Order Statistics Aggregation
2016352 citationsPeng Ye, David Doermann et al.profile →
Future of software development with generative AI
202435 citationsJ. Sauvola, Sasu Tarkoma et al.Automated Software Engineeringprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by David Doermann
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David Doermann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Doermann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Doermann more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Doermann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Doermann. The network helps show where David Doermann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Doermann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Doermann.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Doermann based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Doermann. David Doermann is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sauvola, J., Sasu Tarkoma, Mika Klemettinen, Jukka Riekki, & David Doermann. (2024). Future of software development with generative AI. Automated Software Engineering. 31(1).35 indexed citations breakdown →
Ye, Peng & David Doermann. (2012). Learning features for predicting OCR accuracy.24 indexed citations
15.
Garain, Utpal, et al.. (2012). Leveraging Statistical Transliteration for Dictionary-Based English-Bengali CLIR of OCR'd Text. International Conference on Computational Linguistics. 339–348.5 indexed citations
16.
McNamee, Paul, James Mayfield, Veselin Stoyanov, et al.. (2011). Cross-Language Entity Linking in Maryland during a Hurricane.. Theory and applications of categories.12 indexed citations
17.
Doermann, David, et al.. (2006). Document Image Retrieval Based on Layout Structural Similarity.. IPCV. 606–612.21 indexed citations
18.
Doermann, David, et al.. (2003). Measuring Structural Similarity of Document Pages for Searching Document Image Databases.. 320–325.1 indexed citations
19.
Wolf, Christian, David Doermann, & Mika Rautiainen. (2002). Video Indexing and Retrieval at UMD.. Text REtrieval Conference.5 indexed citations
20.
Darwish, Kareem, et al.. (2001). TREC-10 Experiments at University of Maryland CLIR and Video.. Text REtrieval Conference. 549–561.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.