David C. Sunter

1.7k total citations
25 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

David C. Sunter is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy. According to data from OpenAlex, David C. Sunter has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 15 papers in Molecular Biology and 4 papers in Spectroscopy. Recurrent topics in David C. Sunter's work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (19 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (8 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers). David C. Sunter is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (19 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (8 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (5 papers). David C. Sunter collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and United States. David C. Sunter's co-authors include David E. Jane, Jeffrey C. Watkins, J.C. Watkins, Peter C.K. Pook, Peter M. Udvarhelyi, Graham L. Collingridge, T.E. Salt, Philip L. Jones, Peter Roberts‎ and M A Brown and has published in prestigious journals such as Biochemical Journal, Brain Research and Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

David C. Sunter

25 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David C. Sunter United Kingdom 17 1.1k 853 277 159 106 25 1.5k
B. Le Bourdellès United Kingdom 21 1.7k 1.5× 1.5k 1.8× 260 0.9× 174 1.1× 76 0.7× 26 2.4k
Sally A. Thompson United States 25 1.3k 1.1× 1.2k 1.4× 244 0.9× 114 0.7× 40 0.4× 34 2.4k
Mark W. Fleck United States 20 1.1k 1.0× 1.2k 1.4× 158 0.6× 91 0.6× 54 0.5× 27 1.8k
George McAllister United Kingdom 34 1.4k 1.2× 2.2k 2.6× 138 0.5× 253 1.6× 90 0.8× 65 3.2k
Rajender K. Kamboj United States 21 917 0.8× 865 1.0× 186 0.7× 187 1.2× 82 0.8× 40 1.6k
Miriam Banay‐Schwartz United States 23 655 0.6× 569 0.7× 142 0.5× 410 2.6× 46 0.4× 73 1.5k
Katherine A. Albert United States 13 965 0.9× 1.6k 1.9× 137 0.5× 273 1.7× 44 0.4× 17 2.1k
Stuart J. Mickel Switzerland 16 1.1k 1.0× 1.2k 1.4× 148 0.5× 130 0.8× 37 0.3× 33 2.1k
John W. Ferkany United States 28 1.8k 1.6× 1.3k 1.5× 306 1.1× 351 2.2× 138 1.3× 59 2.5k
Paul D. Edminson Norway 10 718 0.6× 482 0.6× 197 0.7× 156 1.0× 39 0.4× 17 1.3k

Countries citing papers authored by David C. Sunter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David C. Sunter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David C. Sunter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David C. Sunter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David C. Sunter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David C. Sunter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David C. Sunter. The network helps show where David C. Sunter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David C. Sunter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David C. Sunter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David C. Sunter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David C. Sunter. David C. Sunter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wilson, Claire, J.A.K. Howard, DE Jane, David C. Sunter, & J. C. Watkins. (1997). Absolute Configuration of (+)-α-Methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine (MCPG), a Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Antagonist. Acta Crystallographica Section C Crystal Structure Communications. 53(7). 909–911. 4 indexed citations
3.
Jane, David E., K. Pittaway, David C. Sunter, Nicola Thomas, & J.C. Watkins. (1995). New phenylglycine derivatives with potent and selective antagonist activity at presynaptic glutamate receptors in neonatal rat spinal cord. Neuropharmacology. 34(8). 851–856. 95 indexed citations
4.
Hawkins, Lynda M., et al.. (1995). Characterization of the pharmacology and regional distribution of (S)‐[3H]‐5‐fluorowillardiine binding in rat brain. British Journal of Pharmacology. 116(3). 2033–2039. 52 indexed citations
6.
Schulte, Marvin K., Robert J. Roon, David J. Chalmers, David C. Sunter, & James F. Koerner. (1994). Utilization of the resolvedl-isomer of 2-amino-6-phosphonohexanoic acid (l-AP6) as a selective agonist for a quisqualate-sensitized site in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Brain Research. 649(1-2). 203–207. 18 indexed citations
7.
Hayashi, Yasunori, Shigetada Nakanishi, David E. Jane, et al.. (1994). Analysis of Derivatives Subtypes Agonist and Antagonist Activities of Phenylglycine for Different Cloned Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor. 10 indexed citations
10.
Bashir, Zafar I., David E. Jane, David C. Sunter, J.C. Watkins, & Graham L. Collingridge. (1993). Metabotropic glutamate receptors contribute to the induction of long-term depression in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. European Journal of Pharmacology. 239(1-3). 265–266. 117 indexed citations
11.
Jane, David E., Philip L. Jones, Richard H. Porter, et al.. (1993). Competitive antagonism at metabotropic glutamate receptors by (S) -4-carboxyphenylglycine and (RS) -α-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine. European Journal of Pharmacology Molecular Pharmacology. 244(2). 195–197. 200 indexed citations
12.
Eaton, S.A., Ewan F. Birse, B A Wharton, et al.. (1993). Mediation of Thalamic Sensory Responses In Vivo by ACPD‐activated Excitatory Amino Acid Receptors. European Journal of Neuroscience. 5(2). 186–189. 52 indexed citations
13.
Birse, Ewan F., S.A. Eaton, David E. Jane, et al.. (1993). Phenylglycine derivatives as new pharmacological tools for investigating the role of metabotropic glutamate receptors in the central nervous system. Neuroscience. 52(3). 481–488. 131 indexed citations
14.
Croucher, Martin J., et al.. (1993). Relative anticonvulsant potencies of CPP and some novel analogues in the kindled rat. Biochemical Society Transactions. 21(4). 419S–419S. 3 indexed citations
15.
Sunter, David C., et al.. (1991). Actions of the four isomers of 1 aminocyclopentane 1 3 dicarboxylate acpd in the hemisected isolated spinal cord of the neonatal rat. 377. 12 indexed citations
16.
Udvarhelyi, Peter M., David C. Sunter, & J. C. Watkins. (1990). Direct separation of amino acid enantiomers using a chiral crown ether stationary phase. Journal of Chromatography A. 519(1). 69–74. 23 indexed citations
17.
Watkins, J.C., Peter C.K. Pook, David C. Sunter, J. Davies, & T. Honoré. (1990). Experiments with Kainate and Quisqualate Agonists and Antagonists in Relation to the Sub-Classification of ‘Non-NMDA’ Receptors. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 268. 49–55. 26 indexed citations
18.
Irving, Andrew J., J.G. Schofield, Jeffrey C. Watkins, David C. Sunter, & Graham L. Collingridge. (1990). 1S,3R-ACPD stimulates and L-AP3 blocks Ca2+ mobilization in rat cerebellar neurons. European Journal of Pharmacology. 186(2-3). 363–365. 144 indexed citations
19.
Croucher, Martin J., H. F. Bradford, David C. Sunter, & Jeffrey C. Watkins. (1988). Inhibition of the development of electrical kindling of the prepyriform cortex by daily focal injections of excitatory amino acid antagonists. European Journal of Pharmacology. 152(1-2). 29–38. 92 indexed citations
20.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026