David C. Redding

1.6k total citations
110 papers, 970 citations indexed

About

David C. Redding is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, David C. Redding has authored 110 papers receiving a total of 970 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 82 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 40 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 39 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics. Recurrent topics in David C. Redding's work include Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (80 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (36 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (31 papers). David C. Redding is often cited by papers focused on Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (80 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (36 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (31 papers). David C. Redding collaborates with scholars based in United States. David C. Redding's co-authors include Fang Shi, Scott A. Basinger, Catherine M. Ohara, J. V. Breakwell, Joseph J. Green, Andrew E. Lowman, Lee D. Feinberg, Matthew R. Bolcar, Troy W. Barbee and Stuart Shaklan and has published in prestigious journals such as Optics Letters, Journal of the Optical Society of America A and Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics.

In The Last Decade

David C. Redding

102 papers receiving 909 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David C. Redding United States 17 608 335 313 240 214 110 970
Mitchell Troy United States 18 1.2k 2.0× 701 2.1× 399 1.3× 106 0.4× 474 2.2× 111 1.4k
Michael Lloyd‐Hart United States 18 913 1.5× 620 1.9× 352 1.1× 55 0.2× 369 1.7× 118 1.1k
Daniele Gallieni Italy 16 594 1.0× 392 1.2× 184 0.6× 52 0.2× 282 1.3× 83 704
Niek Doelman Netherlands 15 361 0.6× 236 0.7× 75 0.2× 75 0.3× 193 0.9× 89 615
D. I. Robertson United Kingdom 15 597 1.0× 253 0.8× 459 1.5× 76 0.3× 62 0.3× 51 1.0k
Charles L. Matson United States 13 182 0.3× 134 0.4× 24 0.1× 42 0.2× 236 1.1× 75 537
Thomas Bertram Germany 10 149 0.2× 218 0.7× 146 0.5× 28 0.1× 52 0.2× 85 508
R.H. MacPhie Canada 20 410 0.7× 760 2.3× 111 0.4× 461 1.9× 155 0.7× 100 1.1k
Don M. Boroson United States 18 274 0.5× 670 2.0× 140 0.4× 298 1.2× 57 0.3× 58 977
M. de Baar Netherlands 19 81 0.1× 90 0.3× 320 1.0× 216 0.9× 226 1.1× 61 931

Countries citing papers authored by David C. Redding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David C. Redding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David C. Redding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David C. Redding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David C. Redding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David C. Redding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David C. Redding. The network helps show where David C. Redding may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David C. Redding

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David C. Redding. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David C. Redding based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David C. Redding. David C. Redding is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Simons, David, et al.. (2025). sitetool: an application for field site selection and evaluation. California Digital Library.
2.
Dekens, Frank G., Catherine M. Ohara, David C. Redding, et al.. (2024). An efficient method for image based coarse alignment of a segmented space telescope. 13092-151. 153–153. 1 indexed citations
3.
Redding, David C., Scott A. Basinger, Catherine M. Ohara, et al.. (2024). Wavefront sensing and control for a future Habitable Worlds Observatory. 61–61.
4.
5.
Ruane, Garreth, Pin Chen, Larry Dewell, et al.. (2022). Adaptive optics performance of a simulated coronagraph instrument on a large, segmented space telescope in steady state. Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems. 8(3). 3 indexed citations
6.
Adashek, Jacob J. & David C. Redding. (2020). A Pilot Study on the Effects of Nut Consumption on Cardiovascular Biomarkers. Cureus. 12(6). e8798–e8798. 4 indexed citations
7.
Redding, David C., et al.. (2018). Picometer level stability of a mounted mirror assembly. 33–33. 1 indexed citations
8.
Jewell, Jeffrey, Garreth Ruane, Stuart Shaklan, Dimitri Mawet, & David C. Redding. (2017). Optimization of coronagraph design for segmented aperture telescopes. 9912. 17–17. 6 indexed citations
9.
Feinberg, Lee D., Matthew R. Bolcar, Scott Knight, & David C. Redding. (2017). Ultra-Stable Segmented Telescope Sensing and Control Architecture. 1 indexed citations
10.
Redding, David C.. (2016). Active Optics and Large Mirror Technologies. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 1 indexed citations
11.
Korendyke, C. M., D. Chua, R. A. Howard, et al.. (2015). MiniCOR: A miniature coronagraph for an interplanetary CUBESAT. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 2015. 2 indexed citations
12.
Tumlinson, Jason, Sara Seager, Julianne J. Dalcanton, et al.. (2015). Beyond JWST: Science Drivers for the Next Great UVOIR Space Telescope. 225. 1 indexed citations
13.
Riker, Richard R., David C. Redding, Teresa May, et al.. (2011). Correlation of Bivalirudin Dose with Creatinine Clearance During Treatment of Heparin‐Induced Thrombocytopenia. Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy. 31(9). 850–856. 12 indexed citations
14.
Sidick, Erkin, Joseph J. Green, Rhonda Morgan, Catherine M. Ohara, & David C. Redding. (2008). Adaptive cross-correlation algorithm for extended scene Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing. Optics Letters. 33(3). 213–213. 22 indexed citations
15.
Shi, Fang, G. A. Chanan, Catherine M. Ohara, Mitchell Troy, & David C. Redding. (2004). Experimental verification of dispersed fringe sensing as a segment phasing technique using the Keck telescope. Applied Optics. 43(23). 4474–4474. 54 indexed citations
16.
Ohara, Catherine M., J. Faust, Andrew E. Lowman, et al.. (2004). Phase Retrieval Camera optical testing of the Advanced Mirror System Demonstrator (AMSD). Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5487. 954–954. 3 indexed citations
17.
Ohara, Catherine M., David C. Redding, Fang Shi, & Joseph J. Green. (2003). PSF monitoring and in-focus wavefront control for NGST. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 4850. 416–416. 7 indexed citations
18.
Redding, David C., M. W. Regehr, & L. Sievers. (2002). Dynamic models of Fabry-Perot interferometers. Applied Optics. 41(15). 2894–2894. 7 indexed citations
19.
Redding, David C., Scott A. Basinger, Andrew E. Lowman, et al.. (2000). <title>Wavefront control for a segmented deployable space telescope</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 4013. 546–558. 9 indexed citations
20.
Papalexandris, Miltiadis & David C. Redding. (2000). Calculation of diffraction effects on the average phase of an optical field. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 17(10). 1763–1763. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026