David Blinder

1.6k citations
80 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

David Blinder

68 papers receiving 898 citations

Peers

David Blinder
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Media Technology 766
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 95
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 534
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 641
  • Human-Computer Interaction 99
Replace Blain Brown with:
Blain Brown United States
Helge Seetzen Canada
Colin Cameron United Kingdom
Kenichiro Masaoka Japan
Belén Masiá Spain
Praneeth Chakravarthula United States
Ichiro Yuyama Japan
Zehao He China
Ki‐Chul Kwon South Korea
Amar Aggoun United Kingdom
David Blinder relative to Blain Brown United States Blain Brown's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Blain Brown · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Blinder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Blinder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Blinder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Blinder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Blinder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Blinder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Blinder. The network helps show where David Blinder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Blinder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Blinder Line = papers co-authored together David Blinder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20241
3 20241
4 20240
5 20231
6 20230
7 20220
8 202112
9 20217
10 202123
11 202010
12 202021
13 20191
14
Efficient Representation, Generation and Compression of Digital Holograms
20182
15 201838
16 201817
17 20181
18 201715
19 20169
20 201415

About David Blinder

David Blinder is a scholar working on Media Technology, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 80 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Optical Imaging Technologies (58 papers), Digital Holography and Microscopy (50 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (28 papers), Photorefractive and Nonlinear Optics (12 papers), Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (9 papers), Image Processing Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques (6 papers) and Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (766 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (95 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (534 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (641 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (99 citations). David Blinder has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Japan and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Peter Schelkens, Tobias Birnbaum, Athanasia Symeonidou, E. H. Gombrich, Tomoyoshi Shimobaba, Colas Schretter, Adrian Munteanu, Tomoyoshi Ito, Heidi Ottevaere and Tim Bruylants. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Applied Optics, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Optics Letters and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026