David B. Gent

650 total citations
19 papers, 494 citations indexed

About

David B. Gent is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Geophysics and Water Science and Technology. According to data from OpenAlex, David B. Gent has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 494 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 11 papers in Geophysics and 4 papers in Water Science and Technology. Recurrent topics in David B. Gent's work include Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques (14 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (11 papers) and Environmental remediation with nanomaterials (4 papers). David B. Gent is often cited by papers focused on Electrokinetic Soil Remediation Techniques (14 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (11 papers) and Environmental remediation with nanomaterials (4 papers). David B. Gent collaborates with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Australia. David B. Gent's co-authors include Akram N. Alshawabkeh, R. Mark Bricka, Prashanth Buchireddy, Jeffrey L. Davis, Altaf H. Wani, Xingzhi Wu, Steven L. Larson, James Wang, Evan Cox and Xuhui Mao and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, Journal of Hazardous Materials and Chemosphere.

In The Last Decade

David B. Gent

19 papers receiving 478 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David B. Gent United States 14 325 241 107 87 78 19 494
Kranti Maturi United States 8 342 1.1× 206 0.9× 121 1.1× 222 2.6× 89 1.1× 9 567
Petri Latostenmaa Finland 8 622 1.9× 356 1.5× 194 1.8× 118 1.4× 157 2.0× 15 797
Supraja Chinthamreddy United States 8 574 1.8× 423 1.8× 91 0.9× 130 1.5× 122 1.6× 10 703
M.T. Alcántara Spain 10 305 0.9× 178 0.7× 116 1.1× 211 2.4× 87 1.1× 11 542
Reena Amatya Shrestha Finland 16 247 0.8× 161 0.7× 90 0.8× 106 1.2× 102 1.3× 28 475
Matteo Masi Italy 12 264 0.8× 249 1.0× 46 0.4× 28 0.3× 93 1.2× 22 503
Ahmed Ishtiaque Amin Chowdhury Bangladesh 14 329 1.0× 160 0.7× 437 4.1× 111 1.3× 78 1.0× 23 784
Richard E. Saichek United States 12 710 2.2× 518 2.1× 136 1.3× 143 1.6× 212 2.7× 12 819
Gerald R. Eykholt United States 12 338 1.0× 222 0.9× 270 2.5× 31 0.4× 423 5.4× 16 919
Gye-Nam Kim South Korea 13 195 0.6× 144 0.6× 36 0.3× 30 0.3× 90 1.2× 41 433

Countries citing papers authored by David B. Gent

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David B. Gent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David B. Gent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David B. Gent more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David B. Gent

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David B. Gent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David B. Gent. The network helps show where David B. Gent may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David B. Gent

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David B. Gent. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David B. Gent based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David B. Gent. David B. Gent is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Cox, Evan, et al.. (2023). Remediating a PCE Source Area in Clay Using Electrokinetically Enhanced In Situ Bioremediation. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation. 43(3). 70–78. 1 indexed citations
2.
Lin, Che‐Jen, et al.. (2021). Effects of process factors on the performance of electrochemical disinfection for wastewater in a continuous-flow cell reactor. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 28(27). 36573–36584. 14 indexed citations
3.
Jakobsen, Rasmus, et al.. (2018). Challenges in electrochemical remediation of chlorinated solvents in natural groundwater aquifer settings. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 368. 680–688. 25 indexed citations
4.
Gent, David B., et al.. (2018). Electrochemical treatment for greywater reuse: effects of cell configuration on COD reduction and disinfection byproduct formation and removal. Water Science & Technology Water Supply. 19(3). 891–898. 13 indexed citations
5.
Cox, Evan, et al.. (2018). Electrokinetic-Enhanced (EK-Enhanced) Amendment Delivery for Remediation of Low Permeability and Heterogeneous Materials. 4 indexed citations
6.
Lima, Ana T., Annette Hofmann, D. A. Reynolds, et al.. (2017). Environmental Electrokinetics for a sustainable subsurface. Chemosphere. 181. 122–133. 69 indexed citations
7.
Cox, Evan, et al.. (2013). SUCCESFULL PILOT TEST OF ELECTROKINETIC-ENHANCED BIOREMEDIATION (EK-BIO) AS AN INNOVATIVE REMEDIAL APPROACH FOR PCE DNAPL SOURCE AREA. 2 indexed citations
8.
Michalsen, Mandy M., et al.. (2013). Push‐Pull Tests for Estimating RDX and TNT Degradation Rates in Groundwater. Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation. 33(3). 61–68. 20 indexed citations
9.
Mao, Xuhui, James Wang, Ali Ciblak, et al.. (2012). Electrokinetic-enhanced bioaugmentation for remediation of chlorinated solvents contaminated clay. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 213-214. 311–317. 65 indexed citations
10.
Wu, Xingzhi, David B. Gent, Jeffrey L. Davis, & Akram N. Alshawabkeh. (2012). Lactate injection by electric currents for bioremediation of tetrachloroethylene in clay. Electrochimica Acta. 86. 157–163. 22 indexed citations
11.
Gent, David B., Altaf H. Wani, & Akram N. Alshawabkeh. (2012). Experimental design for one dimensional electrolytic reactive barrier for remediation of munition constituent in groundwater. Electrochimica Acta. 86. 130–137. 9 indexed citations
12.
Gent, David B., Altaf H. Wani, Jeffrey L. Davis, & Akram N. Alshawabkeh. (2009). Electrolytic Redox and Electrochemical Generated Alkaline Hydrolysis of Hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5 triazine (RDX) in Sand Columns. Environmental Science & Technology. 43(16). 6301–6307. 25 indexed citations
13.
Buchireddy, Prashanth, R. Mark Bricka, & David B. Gent. (2008). Electrokinetic remediation of wood preservative contaminated soil containing copper, chromium, and arsenic. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 162(1). 490–497. 44 indexed citations
14.
Wu, Xingzhi, et al.. (2007). Lactate Transport in Soil by DC Fields. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 133(12). 1587–1596. 24 indexed citations
15.
Larson, Steve L., et al.. (2005). Characterization of a military training site containing 232Thorium. Chemosphere. 59(7). 1015–1022. 11 indexed citations
16.
Wani, Altaf H., et al.. (2005). Electrolytic transformation of ordinance related compounds (ORCs) in groundwater: Laboratory mass balance studies. Chemosphere. 62(5). 689–698. 14 indexed citations
17.
Alshawabkeh, Akram N., R. Mark Bricka, & David B. Gent. (2005). Pilot-Scale Electrokinetic Cleanup of Lead-Contaminated Soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 131(3). 283–291. 25 indexed citations
18.
Gent, David B.. (2004). Bench- and field-scale evaluation of chromium and cadmium extraction by electrokinetics. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 110(1-3). 53–62. 83 indexed citations
19.
Bednar, Anthony J., et al.. (2004). Mechanisms of Thorium Migration in a Semiarid Soil. Journal of Environmental Quality. 33(6). 2070–2077. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026