Daphne Keller

476 total citations
12 papers, 187 citations indexed

About

Daphne Keller is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Law and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Daphne Keller has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 187 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Law and 4 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Daphne Keller's work include Freedom of Expression and Defamation (5 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (4 papers) and European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (3 papers). Daphne Keller is often cited by papers focused on Freedom of Expression and Defamation (5 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (4 papers) and European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (3 papers). Daphne Keller collaborates with scholars based in United States. Daphne Keller's co-authors include Francis Fukuyama, Alexandra Siegel, Nathaniel Persily, Pablo Barberá, Tim Hwang, Robert Gorwa, Erika Franklin Fowler, Samuel Woolley, Rasmus Kleis Nielsen and Chloe Wittenberg and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Cambridge University Press eBooks and Berkeley technology law journal.

In The Last Decade

Daphne Keller

12 papers receiving 169 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daphne Keller United States	6	110	88	66	44	32	12	187
Jillian York United States	5	119 1.1×	136 1.5×	62 0.9×	44 1.0×	10 0.3×	9	224
T. McGonagle Netherlands	5	142 1.3×	66 0.8×	63 1.0×	47 1.1×	25 0.8×	53	219
Rikke Frank Jørgensen Denmark	8	82 0.7×	55 0.6×	40 0.6×	41 0.9×	21 0.7×	21	164
Katherine Haenschen United States	8	120 1.1×	139 1.6×	51 0.8×	41 0.9×	5 0.2×	17	215
Olga Eisele Austria	10	108 1.0×	120 1.4×	53 0.8×	91 2.1×	6 0.2×	25	291
Mark Leiser Netherlands	5	104 0.9×	56 0.6×	62 0.9×	27 0.6×	12 0.4×	22	172
Magdalena Saldaña Chile	10	207 1.9×	231 2.6×	47 0.7×	34 0.8×	4 0.1×	36	322
Yana Breindl Belgium	7	62 0.6×	96 1.1×	32 0.5×	62 1.4×	6 0.2×	17	142
Joachim Trebbe Germany	6	63 0.6×	66 0.8×	32 0.5×	24 0.5×	6 0.2×	20	156
Spencer McKay Canada	6	135 1.2×	115 1.3×	65 1.0×	75 1.7×	12 0.4×	14	216

Countries citing papers authored by Daphne Keller

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daphne Keller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daphne Keller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daphne Keller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daphne Keller

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daphne Keller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daphne Keller. The network helps show where Daphne Keller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daphne Keller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daphne Keller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daphne Keller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daphne Keller. Daphne Keller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Keller, Daphne. (2023). Platform Transparency and the First Amendment. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

2.

Keller, Daphne. (2022). The EU’s new Digital Services Act and the Rest of the World. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6 indexed citations

3.

Persily, Nathaniel, Andrew M. Guess, Pablo Barberá, et al.. (2020). Social Media and Democracy. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 125 indexed citations

4.

Keller, Daphne. (2020). Facebook Filters, Fundamental Rights, and the CJEU’s Glawischnig-Piesczek Ruling. GRUR International. 69(6). 616–623. 5 indexed citations

5.

Keller, Daphne & Joris van Hoboken. (2019). Design Principles for Intermediary Liability Laws. 3 indexed citations

6.

Keller, Daphne. (2018). Toward a Clearer Conversation About Platform Liability. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations

7.

Keller, Daphne. (2018). Internet Platforms: Observations on Speech, Danger, and Money. SSRN Electronic Journal. 15 indexed citations

8.

Keller, Daphne. (2018). The Right Tools: Europe’s Intermediary Liability Laws and the EU 2016 General Data Protection Regulation. Berkeley technology law journal. 33(1). 287. 12 indexed citations

9.

Keller, Daphne. (2018). Inception Impact Assessment: Measures to Further Improve the Effectiveness of the Fight Against Illegal Content Online. SSRN Electronic Journal. 6 indexed citations

10.

Bridy, Annemarie & Daphne Keller. (2017). U.S. Copyright Office Section 512 Study: Comments in Response to Second Notice of Inquiry. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations

11.

Keller, Daphne. (2017). The Right Tools: Europe's Intermediary Liability Laws and the 2016 General Data Protection Regulation. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations

12.

Bridy, Annemarie & Daphne Keller. (2016). U.S. Copyright Office Section 512 Study: Comments in Response to Notice of Inquiry. SSRN Electronic Journal. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact