Daphne Gille

441 total citations
17 papers, 323 citations indexed

About

Daphne Gille is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Daphne Gille has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 323 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 8 papers in Ecology and 6 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Daphne Gille's work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (8 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (5 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (4 papers). Daphne Gille is often cited by papers focused on Fish Ecology and Management Studies (8 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (5 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (4 papers). Daphne Gille collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Mexico. Daphne Gille's co-authors include Andrea Schreier, B. May, Brian Mahardja, M. C. T. Penedo, Holly B. Ernest, Bernie May, Walter M. Boyce, Scott A. Morrison, Thomas R. Famula and B. May and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Molecular Ecology and Biological Conservation.

In The Last Decade

Daphne Gille

17 papers receiving 316 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Daphne Gille United States 10 156 115 113 58 46 17 323
Steven Duffy Canada 13 149 1.0× 273 2.4× 261 2.3× 66 1.1× 21 0.5× 27 435
А. Е. Барминцева Russia 9 68 0.4× 164 1.4× 211 1.9× 82 1.4× 33 0.7× 26 327
Johanna Sunde Sweden 9 129 0.8× 222 1.9× 144 1.3× 58 1.0× 14 0.3× 22 403
Eyðfinn Magnussen Faroe Islands 11 147 0.9× 124 1.1× 125 1.1× 60 1.0× 27 0.6× 25 395
William S. Bugg Canada 11 125 0.8× 121 1.1× 115 1.0× 146 2.5× 37 0.8× 28 364
Katherine P. Maslenikov United States 9 112 0.7× 113 1.0× 38 0.3× 65 1.1× 15 0.3× 15 254
Lilian Pukk Estonia 10 157 1.0× 122 1.1× 116 1.0× 96 1.7× 7 0.2× 17 324
Anthony J. Clemento United States 11 136 0.9× 290 2.5× 308 2.7× 116 2.0× 9 0.2× 17 473
Omar A. Ali United States 5 184 1.2× 210 1.8× 361 3.2× 150 2.6× 9 0.2× 7 517
N. O’Maoiléidigh Ireland 14 128 0.8× 237 2.1× 105 0.9× 42 0.7× 59 1.3× 21 332

Countries citing papers authored by Daphne Gille

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daphne Gille's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daphne Gille with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daphne Gille more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daphne Gille

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daphne Gille. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daphne Gille. The network helps show where Daphne Gille may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daphne Gille

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daphne Gille. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daphne Gille based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daphne Gille. Daphne Gille is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Miller, Michael R., Andrea Schreier, Matthew A. Campbell, et al.. (2024). Single generation epigenetic change in captivity and reinforcement in subsequent generations in a delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) conservation hatchery. Molecular Ecology. 33(15). e17449–e17449. 3 indexed citations
2.
Bowen, Lizabeth, Karen M. Thorne, Daphne Gille, et al.. (2024). A comparison of eDNA sampling methods in an estuarine environment on presence of longfin smelt (Spirinchus thaleichthys) and fish community composition. Environmental DNA. 6(3). 4 indexed citations
3.
Davis, Brittany E., Bruce G. Hammock, Heather Bell, et al.. (2024). Insights from a year of field deployments inform the conservation of an endangered estuarine fish. Conservation Physiology. 12(1). coae088–coae088. 2 indexed citations
4.
Baerwald, Melinda R., Evan W. Carson, Dennis E. Cocherell, et al.. (2023). Captive-reared Delta Smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) exhibit high survival in natural conditions using in situ enclosures. PLoS ONE. 18(5). e0286027–e0286027. 6 indexed citations
5.
Nelson, Peter S., Melinda R. Baerwald, Alison Collins, et al.. (2022). Considerations for the Development of a Juvenile Production Estimate for Central Valley Spring-Run Chinook Salmon. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science. 20(2). 4 indexed citations
6.
Gille, Daphne, et al.. (2022). Investigation of Molecular Pathogen Screening Assays for Use in Delta Smelt. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science. 20(1). 1 indexed citations
7.
Nagarajan, Raman P., Shawn Acuña, Melinda R. Baerwald, et al.. (2022). Environmental DNA Methods for Ecological Monitoring and Biodiversity Assessment in Estuaries. Estuaries and Coasts. 45(7). 2254–2273. 51 indexed citations
8.
Gille, Daphne, Esther S. Rubin, Brian F. Wakeling, et al.. (2019). Genetic outcomes of translocation of bighorn sheep in Arizona. Journal of Wildlife Management. 83(4). 838–854. 15 indexed citations
9.
Anders, Paul J., Ted Sommer, Brian M. Schreier, et al.. (2018). Considerations for the Use of Captive-Reared Delta Smelt for Species Recovery and Research. San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science. 16(3). 17 indexed citations
11.
Sacks, Benjamin N., Daphne Gille, M. C. T. Penedo, et al.. (2016). Phylogeographic and population genetic structure of bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) in North American deserts. Journal of Mammalogy. 97(3). 823–838. 39 indexed citations
12.
Meek, Mariah H., Caitlin P. Wells, Katharine M. Tomalty, et al.. (2015). Fear of failure in conservation: The problem and potential solutions to aid conservation of extremely small populations. Biological Conservation. 184. 209–217. 65 indexed citations
13.
Meek, Mariah H., Caitlin P. Wells, Katharine M. Tomalty, et al.. (2015). We should not be afraid to talk about fear of failure in conservation. Biological Conservation. 194. 218–219. 1 indexed citations
14.
Boyce, Walter M., T. Winston Vickers, Mathias W. Tobler, et al.. (2015). Genetic population structure of Peninsular bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni) indicates substantial gene flow across US–Mexico border. Biological Conservation. 184. 218–228. 23 indexed citations
15.
Gille, Daphne, Thomas R. Famula, Bernie May, & Andrea Schreier. (2014). Evidence for a maternal origin of spontaneous autopolyploidy in cultured white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus). Aquaculture. 435. 467–474. 20 indexed citations
16.
Schreier, Andrea, B. May, & Daphne Gille. (2013). Incidence of spontaneous autopolyploidy in cultured populations of white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus. Aquaculture. 416-417. 141–145. 19 indexed citations
17.
Schreier, Andrea, Daphne Gille, Brian Mahardja, & B. May. (2011). Neutral markers confirm the octoploid origin and reveal spontaneous autopolyploidy in white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 27. 24–33. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026