Danli Wang

96 total papers · 661 total citations
75 papers, 415 citations indexed

About

Danli Wang is a scholar working on Aquatic Science, Molecular Biology and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Danli Wang has authored 75 papers receiving a total of 415 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Aquatic Science, 20 papers in Molecular Biology and 16 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Danli Wang's work include Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (22 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (12 papers) and Physiological and biochemical adaptations (8 papers). Danli Wang is often cited by papers focused on Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (22 papers), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (12 papers) and Physiological and biochemical adaptations (8 papers). Danli Wang collaborates with scholars based in China and South Korea. Danli Wang's co-authors include Shanliang Xu, Yunlong Zhao, Jinyan Gong, Gongshuai Song, Tinglan Yuan, Chunyang Guo, Ling Li, Di Zuo, Donglei Wu and Yanxin Huang and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Food Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Danli Wang

62 papers receiving 407 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Danli Wang	97	90	89	77	75	75	415
Richard F. Ablett	109 1.1×	123 1.4×	86 1.0×	56 0.7×	92 1.2×	29	465
Kianann Tan	118 1.2×	70 0.8×	113 1.3×	76 1.0×	21 0.3×	45	400
Ruobo Gu	165 1.7×	136 1.5×	80 0.9×	102 1.3×	18 0.2×	44	415
Wei Song	68 0.7×	236 2.6×	123 1.4×	114 1.5×	25 0.3×	36	437
M. Vasconi	148 1.5×	100 1.1×	45 0.5×	48 0.6×	69 0.9×	32	395
B. P. Girish	105 1.1×	77 0.9×	73 0.8×	50 0.6×	14 0.2×	26	382
Tsutomu Noda	66 0.7×	86 1.0×	41 0.5×	44 0.6×	27 0.4×	56	489
Maged Fouda	88 0.9×	62 0.7×	54 0.6×	13 0.2×	109 1.5×	45	492
Montakan Tamtin	301 3.1×	72 0.8×	124 1.4×	67 0.9×	57 0.8×	30	450
Angelo Raffaele Caputo	64 0.7×	131 1.5×	73 0.8×	49 0.6×	164 2.2×	38	491

Countries citing papers authored by Danli Wang

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danli Wang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danli Wang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danli Wang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danli Wang

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danli Wang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danli Wang. The network helps show where Danli Wang may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Danli Wang

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Danli Wang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Danli Wang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Danli Wang. Danli Wang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact