Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES
2012915 citationsAndra Morrison, Julie Polisena et al.International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Careprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Rabb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Rabb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Rabb more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Rabb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Rabb. The network helps show where Danielle Rabb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Danielle Rabb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Danielle Rabb.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Danielle Rabb based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Danielle Rabb. Danielle Rabb is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Tran, Khai, Kristen Moulton, Nancy Santesso, & Danielle Rabb. (2016). Cognitive Processing Therapy for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Europe PMC (PubMed Central).19 indexed citations
3.
Richardson, Marina, et al.. (2016). Capnography for Monitoring End-Tidal CO2 in Hospital and Pre-hospital Settings: A Health Technology Assessment.9 indexed citations
4.
Tran, Khai, Kathryn Coyle, Doug Coyle, et al.. (2015). Drugs for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Comparative Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Effectiveness. Europe PMC (PubMed Central).4 indexed citations
Cimon, Karen, et al.. (2013). Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Review of Comparative Durability and Clinical Effectiveness Beyond 12 Months.1 indexed citations
8.
Cimon, Karen, et al.. (2013). SELECTION OF PUBLICATIONS.1 indexed citations
9.
Morrison, Andra, Julie Polisena, Don Husereau, et al.. (2012). THE EFFECT OF ENGLISH-LANGUAGE RESTRICTION ON SYSTEMATIC REVIEW-BASED META-ANALYSES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. 28(2). 138–144.915 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.