Danielle Pendrick

1.4k total citations
9 papers, 72 citations indexed

About

Danielle Pendrick is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Molecular Biology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Danielle Pendrick has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 72 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Cancer Research, 2 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Danielle Pendrick's work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (4 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (2 papers) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (2 papers). Danielle Pendrick is often cited by papers focused on Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (4 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (2 papers) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (2 papers). Danielle Pendrick collaborates with scholars based in United States. Danielle Pendrick's co-authors include Mahesh Mansukhani, Susan J. Hsiao, Anthony Sireci, Jennifer A. Oberg, Richard D. Carvajal, Gary K. Schwartz, Wendy K. Chung, Kevin A. Roth, Chana L. Glasser and Brian S. Henick and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Blood.

In The Last Decade

Danielle Pendrick

9 papers receiving 71 citations

Peers

Danielle Pendrick

CR

MB

GENET

DEMOG

ONCOL

Robert Irons United States

Fiona Bruinsma Australia

Jessica Marquard United States

Ryan Tan Singapore

Giovanna Traficante Italy

Robin A. Kerstein United States

Nancy Y. Hoffman United Kingdom

Sabine Löhr Germany

Haiying Liu China

Shamsuddin Virani United States

Robert Irons United States

Danielle Pendrick

17 ×0.5

CR

20 ×1.1

MB

6 ×0.4

GENET

0 ×0.0

DEMOG

39 ×3.0

ONCOL

Citations per year, relative to Danielle Pendrick Danielle Pendrick (= 1×) peers Robert Irons

Countries citing papers authored by Danielle Pendrick

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Danielle Pendrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Danielle Pendrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Danielle Pendrick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Danielle Pendrick

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Danielle Pendrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Danielle Pendrick. The network helps show where Danielle Pendrick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Danielle Pendrick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Danielle Pendrick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Danielle Pendrick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Danielle Pendrick. Danielle Pendrick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Xia, Hongai, Shijun Mi, Wen Zhang, et al.. (2022). Benchmarking bioinformatics approaches for tumour mutational burden evaluation from a large cancer panel against whole-exome sequencing. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 76(4). 276–280. 1 indexed citations

2.

Zanazzi, George, Benjamin Liechty, Danielle Pendrick, et al.. (2020). Diffuse midline glioma with novel, potentially targetable, FGFR2–VPS35 fusion. Molecular Case Studies. 6(5). a005660–a005660. 3 indexed citations

3.

Hsiao, Susan J., Anthony Sireci, Danielle Pendrick, et al.. (2020). Clinical Utilization, Utility, and Reimbursement for Expanded Genomic Panel Testing in Adult Oncology. JCO Precision Oncology. 4(4). 1038–1048. 23 indexed citations

4.

Pendrick, Danielle, Jennifer A. Oberg, Susan J. Hsiao, et al.. (2019). Identification of a secondary RET mutation in a pediatric patient with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia leads to the diagnosis and treatment of asymptomatic metastatic medullary thyroid cancer in a parent: a case for sequencing the germline. Molecular Case Studies. 5(2). a003889–a003889. 2 indexed citations

5.

Hsiao, Susan J., Anthony Sireci, Danielle Pendrick, et al.. (2019). Clinical utility and reimbursement for expanded genomic panel testing in adult oncology.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 37(15_suppl). 6593–6593. 4 indexed citations

6.

Marks, Lianna J., Jennifer A. Oberg, Danielle Pendrick, et al.. (2017). Precision Medicine in Children and Young Adults with Hematologic Malignancies and Blood Disorders: The Columbia University Experience. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 5. 265–265. 21 indexed citations

7.

Marks, Lianna J., Jennifer A. Oberg, Julia Glade Bender, et al.. (2016). Molecular Profiling of High-Risk Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Blood. 128(22). 5250–5250. 1 indexed citations

8.

Strasser, Sheryl, et al.. (2011). A Survey of Georgia Adult Protective Service Staff: Implications for Older Adult Injury Prevention and Policy. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6 indexed citations

9.

Strasser, Sheryl, et al.. (2011). A survey of georgia adult protective service staff: implications for older adult injury prevention and policy.. PubMed. 12(3). 357–64. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact