Daniela Willems

479 citations
21 papers · 376 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Willems

21 papers receiving 365 citations

Peers

Daniela Willems
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Biochemistry 34
  • Ophthalmology 34
  • Molecular Biology 278
  • Aging 5
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 44
Replace Orit Segev with:
Orit Segev Israel
Guido Fellbrich Germany
Stephanie Nelson United States
Kazutomo Toyofuku Japan
Risa Sato Japan
Christian Schori Switzerland
Chaya Chintamaneni United States
Xiangyang Yang China
Jeong Sun Seo South Korea
Agustín Luz-Madrigal United States
Daniela Willems relative to Orit Segev Israel Orit Segev's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.3×
Orit Segev · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Willems

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Willems's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Willems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Willems more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Willems

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Willems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Willems. The network helps show where Daniela Willems may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Willems, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Willems Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Willems links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201354
2 199645
3 200042
4 199735
5 197931
6
Design and validation of siRNAs and shRNAs.
200924
7 199321
8 200418
9 200217
10 201414
11 199712
12 202211
13 201510
14 200910
15 20109
16 19927
17 19945
18
Primi risultati di transdifferenziamento lentogeno delta cornea di larve di Xenopus laevis indotto da aFGF
19945
19 19943
20 20242

About Daniela Willems

Daniela Willems is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, Ophthalmology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 21 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (3 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (2 papers), Corneal Surgery and Treatments (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (2 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (2 papers) and Muscle Physiology and Disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (34 citations), Ophthalmology (34 citations), Molecular Biology (278 citations), Aging (5 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (44 citations). Daniela Willems has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Luigi Bosco, G Venturini, Mario Molinaro, Marina Bouché, E. Boy de la Tour, Michaël Chandler, L. Caro, Enrico Santangelo, Maurizio Enea Picarella and Roberta Melchionna. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience, The FASEB Journal, BMC Genetics, Developmental Biology and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact