Daniela Roditi

506 total citations
9 papers, 370 citations indexed

About

Daniela Roditi is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Daniela Roditi has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 370 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Pharmacology and 5 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Daniela Roditi's work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (7 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers) and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers). Daniela Roditi is often cited by papers focused on Pain Management and Placebo Effect (7 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers) and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers). Daniela Roditi collaborates with scholars based in United States. Daniela Roditi's co-authors include Michael E. Robinson, Jennifer M. Mundt, Christina S. McCrae, Lori B. Waxenberg, Ryan J. Anderson, Roland Staud, Ashley Curtis, Richard B. Berry, Mary Beth Miller and Jacob M. Williams and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and SLEEP.

In The Last Decade

Daniela Roditi

9 papers receiving 355 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Daniela Roditi United States	8	159	146	112	104	56	9	370
Jennifer M. Mundt United States	10	162 1.0×	146 1.0×	106 0.9×	136 1.3×	44 0.8×	20	386
Ilse Viane Belgium	4	262 1.6×	122 0.8×	146 1.3×	50 0.5×	129 2.3×	4	399
Eric W. de Heer Netherlands	7	168 1.1×	57 0.4×	144 1.3×	47 0.5×	63 1.1×	11	421
Rebecca Czlapinski United States	9	195 1.2×	82 0.6×	74 0.7×	33 0.3×	70 1.3×	12	316
Sungkun Cho South Korea	13	210 1.3×	112 0.8×	79 0.7×	92 0.9×	97 1.7×	34	428
Marcelo Rivano Fischer Sweden	13	325 2.0×	104 0.7×	161 1.4×	46 0.4×	133 2.4×	31	479
James N. Marchman United States	8	85 0.5×	77 0.5×	118 1.1×	63 0.6×	150 2.7×	12	385
Sophia Åkerblom Sweden	9	225 1.4×	83 0.6×	109 1.0×	40 0.4×	133 2.4×	15	347
Fiona Clague United Kingdom	6	74 0.5×	232 1.6×	279 2.5×	52 0.5×	90 1.6×	6	540
Lin Yu United Kingdom	10	243 1.5×	84 0.6×	104 0.9×	62 0.6×	247 4.4×	21	428

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Roditi

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Roditi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Roditi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Roditi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Roditi

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Roditi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Roditi. The network helps show where Daniela Roditi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniela Roditi

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniela Roditi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniela Roditi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniela Roditi. Daniela Roditi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

McCrae, Christina S., Daniela Roditi, Ryan J. Anderson, et al.. (2018). Cognitive behavioral treatments for insomnia and pain in adults with comorbid chronic insomnia and fibromyalgia: clinical outcomes from the SPIN randomized controlled trial. SLEEP. 42(3). 84 indexed citations

Mundt, Jennifer M., Daniela Roditi, & Michael E. Robinson. (2016). A Comparison of Deceptive and Non-Deceptive Placebo Analgesia: Efficacy and Ethical Consequences. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 51(2). 307–315. 26 indexed citations

Robinson, Michael E., et al.. (2012). Investigating patient expectations and treatment outcome in a chronic low back pain population. Journal of Pain Research. 5. 15–15. 22 indexed citations

Roditi, Daniela, et al.. (2011). Factors Affecting Placebo Acceptability: Deception, Outcome, and Disease Severity. Journal of Pain. 12(8). 920–928. 15 indexed citations

Roditi, Daniela, et al.. (2011). Empirical ethics: factors affecting the acceptability of a placebo analgesic treatment. Journal of Pain. 12(4). P27–P27. 1 indexed citations

Roditi, Daniela, et al.. (2011). The role of psychological interventions in the management of patients with chronic pain. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 41–41. 151 indexed citations

Dzierzewski, Joseph M., Jacob M. Williams, Daniela Roditi, et al.. (2010). Daily Variations in Objective Nighttime Sleep and Subjective Morning Pain in Older Adults with Insomnia: Evidence of Covariation over Time. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 58(5). 925–930. 45 indexed citations

Roditi, Daniela, Lori B. Waxenberg, & Michael E. Robinson. (2010). Frequency and Perceived Effectiveness of Coping Define Important Subgroups of Patients With Chronic Pain. Clinical Journal of Pain. 26(8). 677–682. 10 indexed citations

Roditi, Daniela. (2009). Effects of coping statements on experimental pain in chronic pain patients. Journal of Pain Research. 2. 109–109. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact