Daniela Raicu

2.8k citations
120 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Daniela Raicu

107 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Daniela Raicu
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 470
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 343
  • Artificial Intelligence 444
  • Health Informatics 16
  • Aging 18
Replace Mathias Lux with:
Mathias Lux Austria
Kyung-Ah Sohn South Korea
Bernard Gibaud France
Muhammad Imran Sharif Pakistan
Duc‐Tien Dang‐Nguyen Norway
Rizwan Ahmed Khan Pakistan
Congcong Wang China
Naveed Abbas Pakistan
Shintami Chusnul Hidayati Indonesia
Roberto Pirrone Italy
Daniela Raicu relative to Mathias Lux Austria Mathias Lux's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Mathias Lux · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Raicu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Raicu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Raicu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Raicu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Raicu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Raicu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Raicu. The network helps show where Daniela Raicu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Raicu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Raicu Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Raicu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 120 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004116
2
CO-OCCURRENCE MATRICES FOR VOLUMETRIC DATA
200484
3 201141
4 200939
5 200735
6 200731
7 201930
8 201826
9 200726
10 200925
11 201024
12 201123
13 200520
14 200720
15 200919
16 201517
17 200816
18 201514
19 201014
20 201014

About Daniela Raicu

Daniela Raicu is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Molecular Biology, having authored 120 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (38 papers), AI in cancer detection (34 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (23 papers), Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (21 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (18 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (13 papers), COVID-19 diagnosis using AI (11 papers) and Topic Modeling (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (470 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (343 citations), Artificial Intelligence (444 citations), Health Informatics (16 citations) and Aging (18 citations). Daniela Raicu has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jacob Furst, Dong-Hui Xu, David S. Channin, Samuel G. Armato, Noriko Tomuro, Yu Zhang, Katherine J. Strandburg, Jonathan Gemmell, Alexander Rasin and Samah Fodeh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Digital Imaging, Surgery, Bioinformatics, BMC Neuroscience and Frontiers in Big Data.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact